Misplaced Pages

Intelligent design: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:20, 30 November 2001 view sourceDmerrill (talk | contribs)0 edits initial sentence with bolded title. Please write in complete sentences, and also please link words or phrases which are or will be articles someday.← Previous edit Revision as of 17:23, 30 November 2001 view source Ed Poor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers59,237 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:




Adherents of ID consider their idea that God causes speciation a viable scientific ]. Scientists deny that this hypothesis can be considered scientific at all, and consider it a philosophical or religious idea outside the realm of science. In particular, Intelligent Design is not falsifyable. Adherents of ID consider their idea that God causes speciation a viable scientific hypothesis. Scientists generally consider it unscientific, because it is not falsifiable and so merely a philosophical or religious idea outside the realm of science.





Revision as of 17:23, 30 November 2001

Intelligent design is a theory of evolution which asserts that God guided the process of evolution.


Intelligent Design (ID) accepts the idea that fossils provide scientists with a useful tool (the Fossil Record) to date the appearance and extinction of new species. Speciation is considered to occur due to deliberate acts of God. The subsequent survival or extinction of a newly arisen speciation is believed to happen due to natural selection.


ID has two ideas in common with Darwinian evolution: acceptance of the fossil record and of natural selection. This ideas distinguish ID from Sudden Creationism.


Adherents of ID consider their idea that God causes speciation a viable scientific hypothesis. Scientists generally consider it unscientific, because it is not falsifiable and so merely a philosophical or religious idea outside the realm of science.


/Talk