Misplaced Pages

User talk:76.181.250.255: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:33, 19 February 2009 edit76.181.250.255 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 13:06, 22 February 2009 edit undoMoonriddengirl (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators135,072 edits block extended, http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=272470697#Disruptive_IP.2C_feedback_requestedNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:


Blow me. ] (]) 20:33, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Blow me. ] (]) 20:33, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

:Following conversation at the Administrator's Noticeboard, you have been blocked for two months for ]. You give no reason to believe that you intend to work within processes and guidelines when your block for edit warring would have expired, and your past behavior in this IP and in previous IPs, {{Useranon|76.181.232.187}} and {{Useranon|71.72.84.29}}, demonstrates a long-term pattern of disruption and unwillingness to work within the ]. If you wish to ], you may place <nowiki>{{unblock|your reason here}}</nowiki> on your page with your rationale. You may also request unblocking if you decide to work within the dispute resolution process rather than revert-warring when others disagree with you. --] <sup>]</sup> 13:06, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:06, 22 February 2009

Edit warring, final notice

You have already been cautioned about edit warring on Gothic music, here. The next time you revert the article without first having pursued dispute resolution, either by discussion with the other contributor or by inviting wider participation to establish consensus, I will block your IP address for edit warring. Please consider seeking a third opinion or otherwise involving other editors to establish clear consensus as set out at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution and Misplaced Pages:Edit war. You may wish to ask for participation at the noticeboard of a relevant music project, such as Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Alternative music. --Moonriddengirl 12:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

I tried "dispute resolution". But somebody refuses to budge. Now I have been involved in that scene for 24 years and I am telling you that Gothic music and Gothic rock are not the same thing. The only sites that exist on the matter are so called "fan sites" because that's all that exists in "music fan culture". I have lived this lifestyle for longer than many people who edit on this site have been alive. So mine is not "original research" it's first hand experience that has lasted over two decades.

Consensus means nothing when 95% of the people who use the word "Goth" and think that they know what it means don't know their asses from a hole in the ground and wouldn't know Goth if they walked in on it sodomizing their mother.

Oh, and I don't appreciated your tone. You do not "warn" me and you sure as hell don't threaten me. Got it?

I'm sorry if you felt my tone was offensive. It was my hope to prevent the need for a block. When your block expires, please consider dispute resolution. --Moonriddengirl 13:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah. Way to dumb down wikipedia even more by blocking the guy who was making sure the people who go to the Gothic music page don't get redirected to something unrelated. You're a mother fucking idiot.76.181.250.255 (talk) 02:04, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

If you care about where people who go to the Gothic music page wind up, I'd suggest you follow dispute resolution. If you persist in reverting it without following dispute resolution after your block expires, you will be blocked again, for a longer period of time. We have policies and guidelines concerning both behavior and article development on Misplaced Pages; disrupting the project by failing to follow those is likely to result in the suspension of your editing privileges. Note that these behavioral policies also govern your interactions with other editors. Such behavior can result in your being blocked all on its own. See Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks and Misplaced Pages:Disruptive editing. --Moonriddengirl 13:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Blow me. 76.181.250.255 (talk) 20:33, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Following conversation at the Administrator's Noticeboard, you have been blocked for two months for disruptive editing. You give no reason to believe that you intend to work within processes and guidelines when your block for edit warring would have expired, and your past behavior in this IP and in previous IPs, 76.181.232.187 (talk) and 71.72.84.29 (talk), demonstrates a long-term pattern of disruption and unwillingness to work within the consensus-building process. If you wish to appeal the block, you may place {{unblock|your reason here}} on your page with your rationale. You may also request unblocking if you decide to work within the dispute resolution process rather than revert-warring when others disagree with you. --Moonriddengirl 13:06, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
User talk:76.181.250.255: Difference between revisions Add topic