Misplaced Pages

User:MBisanz/Recall: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:MBisanz Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:58, 6 March 2009 editSteve Smith (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,250 edits Undid revision 275457406 by Bishonen (talk) Let's keep discussion on the talk page.← Previous edit Revision as of 19:40, 8 March 2009 edit undoSteve Smith (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,250 edits closing recall as unsuccessfulNext edit →
Line 45: Line 45:
*] ( ) *] ( )
*] ( ) *] ( )
*] (x ) *] ( )


==Filer section== ==Filer section==

brrryce
===Filer identity=== ===Filer identity===
<!--sign below this comment--> <!--sign below this comment-->

Jae Bryson
===Filer statement=== ===Filer statement===
<!--placed below this comment--> <!--placed below this comment-->

The editor deleted a story that had a deletion discussion. The deletion was NOT approved and he still deleted the article.
===Power(s) abused=== ===Power(s) abused===
'''Check the (x) for the admin action(s) abused:''' '''Check the (x) for the admin action(s) abused:'''
*] ( ) *] ( )
*] ( ) *] ( )
*] (X ) *] ( )
*] ( ) *] ( )
*] ( ) *] ( )
Line 92: Line 92:


==Editors who agree with filer== ==Editors who agree with filer==
===Five administrators who agree with filer=== ===Five administrators who agrees with filer===
#. #.
#. #.

Revision as of 19:40, 8 March 2009

My recall procedure

Ground rules

So let's get some ground rules down:

  • Filer = Auto-confirmed user not under editing restrictions.
  • Administrator in good standing = 1,500+ edits, 6+ months experience, no blocks in last 6 months, not under editing restrictions.
  • One recall request per incident.
  • One recall request per editor per year.
  • If you don't like these ground rules, there are WP:AN, WP:ARBCOM, WP:RFC and Jimbo who can review my actions and act accordingly.
  • Only actions that involve my use of an administrative function (something an auto-confirmed user/rollbacker couldn't do) or in my role as a member of the Bot Approvals Group are grounds for a recall. There are plenty of noticeboards to handle other actions as well as well as User Conduct RfCs.
  • This process is an optional, expedited process, the above forums may be used in place of it, at the filer's discretion.
  • If I am "recalled" I will either resign my adminship or re-stand for RFA, the choice of which option shall be mine. If the issue relates to BAG, I will either resign my BAG position or re-stand for RBAG, the choice of which option shall be mine
  • The clerk selected will manage the technical page formatting aspects and interpret the close of the recall.

Can I file a recall request?

If you answered yes to all of the above statements, you may file a recall request. Please see a clerk for further help.

Can I agree with a filed recall request?

If you answered yes to all of the above statements, you may agree with a filed recall request. Please see a clerk for further help.

Procedure

  1. A user who wishes to initiate a recall proceeding shall sign in the space below, add a short summary of what they are basing the recall request on (must be less than 1,000 words and 100 diffs), and place an "X" in the check boxes of the administrative power(s) abused.
  2. They must notify me on my talk page User talk:MBisanz of the initiation of recall. (The order of steps 1 and 2 may be reversed at filer's discretion).
  3. They must select a clerk from the list below and notify the clerk of the recall. There will be one clerk and only one clerk per recall request, selected form the list below, by the filer.
  4. The clerk will then notify appropriate forums of the recall, starting the clock ticking (These will include WP:AN, WP:ANI, WP:BN, WT:RFA (if Admin related), active RFC (if applicable), WP:BON (if BAG related), WT:BOT (if BAG related), WT:BAG (if BAG related), and my Admin Coaches (Academic Challenger, Rlevse, Keilana).
  5. The recall will last 48 hours, extendable at the clerk's discretion to a maximum of 96 hours.
  6. If 5 administrators in good standing (in addition to the original filer) sign that they request recall, then the recall will be considered to have passed. If it is a BAG related issue, at least one member of the Bot Approval Group must be among those requesting or agreeing with recall for it to be considered to have passed. If the issue relates to adminship, I will either re-stand for WP:RFA or resign adminship. If the issue relates to BAG, I will either resign my BAG position or re-stand for RBAG. If it relates to both, I will do both.
  7. If procedure six does not occur, the recall will close with no further action occurring in this forum. Again, all the above forums remain available.

Clerks

Please use an (X) to indicate the individual selected to clerk the recall.

Filer section

Filer identity

Filer statement

Power(s) abused

Check the (x) for the admin action(s) abused:


Check the (x) for the BAG action(s) abused:

Editors who agree with filer

Five administrators who agrees with filer

  1. .
  2. .
  3. .
  4. .
  5. .
User:MBisanz/Recall: Difference between revisions Add topic