Misplaced Pages

User talk:Imzadi1979: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:37, 20 April 2009 editSoxBot II (talk | contribs)19,239 edits Delivering Vol. 5, Issue 16 of Misplaced Pages Signpost (BOT)← Previous edit Revision as of 23:05, 20 April 2009 edit undoOverpush (talk | contribs)805 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 98: Line 98:


<small>Delivered by ] (]) at 18:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)</small> <small>Delivered by ] (]) at 18:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)</small>

==Stop==
Stop with your lies and harassment. I wish to have no further communication with you. Any further communication from you will be considered harassment. This is your only warning. ] (]) 23:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:05, 20 April 2009

Archiving icon
Archives

Archive 123456



This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Posting M-61 Historic Western Terminus

I observed the Infobox for M-76 showing its historic western terminus with M-22. I would like to see M-61's Infobox show its western most historic terminus with US-131 (now Mackinaw Trail), but, for some reason, even after I tried to do it by comparing it with one you did (maybe the M-76/M-22 one), it won't show up that way in M-61's Infobox. If you think this would be of interest information wise, can you post it in M-61's Infobox, because I don't know what I'm doing wrong (BTW, I drove old 61 from M-115 to Mackinaw Trail this past week). Thank you much, and take care. User:Igo4U

I only did 4 highways when I got your reply. I didn't mean any harm. I was only trying to make the articles informative. User:Igo4U, 3-15-2008.

A class review

Thanks, I will implement your suggestions ASAP

PR

You are most welcome. I just posted four more comments in response to your replies to my original review. My explanation of the inflation-template problem is murky. If you play around with the variant in your sandbox, I think you'll see how it works. If not, poke me up, and I'll try again. Finetooth (talk) 04:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

P.S. Thanks for mentioning "magic word". I could see that it worked but did not behave exactly like other templates. I didn't know that it and other similar things had a special name. Finetooth (talk) 04:50, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages SignpostMisplaced Pages Signpost: 30 March 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages SignpostMisplaced Pages Signpost: 6 April 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages SignpostMisplaced Pages Signpost: 13 April 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


Speedy deletion of Template:Jctintlegend

A tag has been placed on Template:Jctintlegend requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. KelleyCook (talk) 16:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

NO

No. Overpush (talk) 16:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages SignpostMisplaced Pages Signpost: 20 April 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Stop

Stop with your lies and harassment. I wish to have no further communication with you. Any further communication from you will be considered harassment. This is your only warning. Overpush (talk) 23:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Imzadi1979: Difference between revisions Add topic