| Revision as of 03:13, 20 November 2005 edit128.125.140.68 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:31, 1 December 2005 edit undoJeravicious (talk | contribs)108 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| (Feel free to this list and add stuff into here that you think needs to be worked on) | (Feel free to this list and add stuff into here that you think needs to be worked on) | ||
| * In the spirit of being Balanced and Fair, shouldn't the 5 part Criticism/Allegations Of Bias/Controversies sections be placed in a separate entry perhaps called "'''Television News Media Bias'''"? After all, there is no such section for the MSNBC entry and only a small blurb for CNN (there isn't even a bias section for Al-Jazeera). Having such a long ''"editorial"'' describing possible right-wing bias of FOX News with paragraph after paragraph of criticisms only seems to add merit to a Left-wing conspiracy....and noone wants to be accused of that. Otherwise, some might start adding sections to MSNBC regarding the bias and political views of it's hosts (Matthews, Obermann, Imus, etc). I think it would be better to stick to the basic information and facts and then link to editorials and alleged biases of ALL the 24 hour news networks in a different Entry. | |||
| *We need to iron out the wrinkles that have been caused by a lot of edits recently and some issues, such as: | *We need to iron out the wrinkles that have been caused by a lot of edits recently and some issues, such as: | ||
| :#Right Wing vs. Conservative | :#Right Wing vs. Conservative | ||
Revision as of 02:31, 1 December 2005
(Feel free to edit this list and add stuff into here that you think needs to be worked on)
- In the spirit of being Balanced and Fair, shouldn't the 5 part Criticism/Allegations Of Bias/Controversies sections be placed in a separate entry perhaps called "Television News Media Bias"? After all, there is no such section for the MSNBC entry and only a small blurb for CNN (there isn't even a bias section for Al-Jazeera). Having such a long "editorial" describing possible right-wing bias of FOX News with paragraph after paragraph of criticisms only seems to add merit to a Left-wing conspiracy....and noone wants to be accused of that. Otherwise, some might start adding sections to MSNBC regarding the bias and political views of it's hosts (Matthews, Obermann, Imus, etc). I think it would be better to stick to the basic information and facts and then link to editorials and alleged biases of ALL the 24 hour news networks in a different Entry.
- We need to iron out the wrinkles that have been caused by a lot of edits recently and some issues, such as:
- Right Wing vs. Conservative
- 206.15.101.1-2's edits
- Ratings Drop
- AQH vs. CUME Rating
- Kerry's Pen
- Oil-for-food
- Cavuto -- Social Security -- Michael Jackson
- Whistleblower Lawsuit
- Ailes "rebuttal"
- Fox didn't have the highest ratings during the Democratic Convention. CNN did. A simple google search will tell you this.
- Some sections probably need to be re-written:
- "Major Stories Fox Has Broken"
- FAIR bulletpoint
- Bias Section needs to be completely reorganized.
- Grammar
- Several instances of punctuation outside of quotes need to be corrected. In most cases, punctuation belongs inside quotes. For example, "this is a quote," and "this is, too." Note the comma and period are enclosed within the quotation marks.
- Everything until "Trademark Disputes" with periods has been fixed. I haven't looked at commas yet. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 17:16, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
- I just checked the punctuation within quotes throughout the article, and fixed all errors I could find. If someone would like to confirm that this is completed, we can remove grammar from this to do list. — Ash211 16:03, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- Everything until "Trademark Disputes" with periods has been fixed. I haven't looked at commas yet. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 17:16, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
- Several instances of punctuation outside of quotes need to be corrected. In most cases, punctuation belongs inside quotes. For example, "this is a quote," and "this is, too." Note the comma and period are enclosed within the quotation marks.