Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:01, 5 October 2009

Welcome!Last edited: Last edited by:17:01, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 68.41.80.161 (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account! Your host, c-68-41-80-161.hsd1.mi.comcast.net (68.41.80.161), is registered to Comcast of Canton, Michigan, an Internet service provider through which multiple users may connect to the Internet via proxy, so you may receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Please. If you have some critisism, post it. Don't spam this talk page with your own useless edit warring... again. :) I have the distinct honor of being a vandalized anon ip. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.41.80.161 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

July 2009

"that comment didn't look right there but it should be included somewhere" Agreed. I think it’s mentioned on the Paul Watson article, but I’m not sure where it would be best to work it in on the Whale Wars article if at all. — NRen2k5, 06:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Sea Shepherds

I appreciate it and thank you as well. I kind of enjoy the challenge of keeping neutral even when my personal views contradict it. Let me know if you see me slip up! Cptnono (talk) 22:32, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

It happens. I usually try to have a copy paste of my edit ready just in case. No worries at all.Cptnono (talk) 05:23, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

This article needs so much clean up. I need to start doing proper refs now that the reverting IPs are gone. Not sure if you edit much but have fun. You'll learn a decent amount about different wiki ins and outs working on an article as broken as this. The best part will probably be removing the blatant grandstanding, though!Cptnono (talk) 05:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

You have made some very cogent points at WP:NPOV/N regarding the SSCS dispute. Kudos to you, sir! — Kralizec! (talk) 01:43, 11 September 2009 (UTC)`

Hi #68. Di yiu have a loog ing yet? So the eco-terroroism cat stayed for awhile than someone had a knee-jerk reaction and reverted (I fixed after 24hrs of no rebuttal was provided). Instead of discussing the issue he marked the cat for deletion. At first I was a little pissed off but reread the guideline again. There can be a few different ways to address the issue so I thought you might be interested in the deletion discussion Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 September 28#Category:Eco-terrorism.

Besides that issue, we got so much good information in but then hit a wall. Let me know if you have any ideas on the next step to getting it higher on the assesment scale.Cptnono (talk) 03:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

test

I dunno.

References

1. see here

Inapropriate use of warning templates

Please be careful about using {{Uw-delete3}} these templates should only be vandalism. As Misplaced Pages:Vandalism says Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. User:Hans Adler edits are clearly done in good faith, hence the template is inappropriate.--Salix (talk): 08:20, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

While I agree that it was not outright vandalism I disagree with your inclusion of the "deletion" warning as a vandalsim warning. Any "vandalism" warning would definately apply to what you are saying. As it is however, the warning that was given was more about the removal of countent without good reason. The warned user has a history of deleting anything negative about that organization and often times uses inapropriate justifications, like BLP for an org or notabillity of sources wven when its a governmental source cited in a major news organization. I think at that point, the deletion tag is quite appropriate. I appreciate the concern and welcome further discussion if you think I've missed something. Thanks and happy editing. --68.41.80.161 (talk) 15:18, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Also, what warning tag would you propose when an editor attempts to apply any WP over and over to protect the image of a subject? I'm definately open to improvment. --68.41.80.161 (talk) 15:20, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Misplaced Pages is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Sea Shepherd Conservation Society appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Crafty (talk) 03:48, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thank you for your concern. Check the talk page on that article. You will see an in depth discussion as well as numerous citations that fall in line with WP:Terrorist. The POV push is coming from the opposite direction, that being to protect the image of something despite the notable expert opinion. If you ahve any problemn finding the notable expert opinion on the page, write back and I'll link it for you. --68.41.80.161 (talk) 03:53, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

As a followup, see the discussion at category:Eco-terrorism on deletion. It seems to be a pretty solid consensus that the cat stands. --68.41.80.161 (talk) 03:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Actually.. here it is: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_September_28#Category:Eco-terrorism .

Talkback

Crafty (talk) 04:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Recent Edits

Hello 68.41.*. See the note that I left at User talk:Tranquillity Base#A lengthy discussion of your edits at WP:AN3. The same caution applies to all participants in the revert war, in which you are apparently included. EdJohnston (talk) 05:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for looking into it and thank you for being civil. --68.41.80.161 (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 15:43, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your disagreement with me is not vandalism. Seek consensus in talk page of the article. --68.41.80.161 (talk) 15:46, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Warning added your talkpage for not assuming good faith when disagreeing with another editor. --68.41.80.161 (talk) 15:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

3RR at Sea Shepherd Conservation Society

You are over 3RR for October 5. Please undo your last change. You were warned as the result of a 3RR case in September. Any party who was notified in that case that continues to edit war may be blocked without further notice. EdJohnston (talk) 16:22, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

No I'm not. I reverted Aussie once and his sock puppet once. --68.41.80.161 (talk) 16:27, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

I modified my comment. I don't have the time to fully check your first edit of October 5 to see if it's a revert. My point about edit warring stands, and so does the warning. Have you opened a case at WP:SPI to validate your claim that the most recent IP editor is a sock of User:AussieLegend? EdJohnston (talk) 16:46, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate that boss. :) I have not opened a claim yet. I don't know how that all works. All I know is he kept reverting me, then he logged off and a brand new IP reverted me from the same area. --68.41.80.161 (talk) 16:48, 5 October 2009 (UTC)