| Revision as of 03:39, 19 October 2009 editBrandon (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators22,639 edits close← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:53, 20 October 2009 edit undoMuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,096 edits →Conclusions: Archiving. Nothing else can be done here.Next edit → | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| *:IP tagged as a sock, if further edits are made it should be blocked. 03:39, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | *:IP tagged as a sock, if further edits are made it should be blocked. 03:39, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| {{SPIclose}} | {{SPIclose|archive}} | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 01:53, 20 October 2009
ObserverNY
ObserverNY (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/ObserverNY/Archive.
Report date October 15 2009, 19:16 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- 68.194.235.103 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
Evidence submitted by HelloAnnyong
Several weeks ago, 68.194 made this edit, and Observer later admitted that she had made the edit in an attempt to prove a point, and referred to it as her "silly game". Observer was later banned for incivility and other issues.
Recently, the IP made this edit. It's not a particularly significant edit, but that seems like block evasion to me. I brought this up at WP:ANI and was told to open an SPI. — HelloAnnyong 19:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
ObserverNY comments on "enrolled in vs attend" hereand edited anonymously on other pages here Most definitely is ObserverNY. Doesn’t matter if it is just a “grammar fix.” That IP needs to be blocked as well. La mome (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Conclusions
Administrator note - While it could quite possibly be ObserverNY, the edit is nothing more than a simple grammar fix. I don't see that any action is really necessary here, although I will leave this up for another administrator to take a look at. NW (Talk) 19:25, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- IP tagged as a sock, if further edits are made it should be blocked. 03:39, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
|
This case has been marked as closed. It will shortly be archived automatically. |
{{SPIclose}} is deprecated. Please change the parameter in the {{SPI case status}} to "close" instead.
Categories: