| Revision as of 07:57, 28 December 2005 editSCZenz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,321 edits →Enough of this: c'mon...← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:00, 28 December 2005 edit undoArchjr (talk | contribs)20 edits →Enough of thisNext edit → | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| :: Not really. I have to say I can't see why, if you plan to use this account only for attacks and vandalism, it shouldn't be blocked. The question, really, is will you or will you not continue to delete material from articles, create hoax pages, and attack users? -- ] 07:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | :: Not really. I have to say I can't see why, if you plan to use this account only for attacks and vandalism, it shouldn't be blocked. The question, really, is will you or will you not continue to delete material from articles, create hoax pages, and attack users? -- ] 07:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ::: Gosh, you're right, that sentence ''was'' overcomplicated. But, since you know what I meant perfectly well, you can answer the question. -- ] 07:57, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | ::: Gosh, you're right, that sentence ''was'' overcomplicated. But, since you know what I meant perfectly well, you can answer the question. -- ] 07:57, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::::::::::YES!!!!(Way to delete my signed comment. Nice double standard.)] | |||
Revision as of 08:00, 28 December 2005
Please stop adding nonsense to Misplaced Pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Valermos 06:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- If you continue to add nonsense and personally attack people on wikipedia, you will be banned from editing. --Valermos 06:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Removing signed user comments is also considered vandalism... Consider this your last warning. --Valermos 07:09, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
I was just removing it because it was stupid and I was tired of vandalism hurting Misplaced Pages.Archjr
Arch Hall Jr. Ugly guy
By our powers combined, Arch Hall Jr and his attempts at stardom will not go unnoticed but shall be known for the grotesque failures for which they are.
Who's with me? Just look what this guy had to say...
Enough of this
|
OK. It is time for the joking to end. You are potentially offending people, both people here in the Misplaced Pages community and the wider readership. What you are doing could be seen as vandalism and you could get blocked from editing Misplaced Pages for it. You might not get another warning before having a block imposed. So be careful and be serious from here on in. |
And stop making personal attacks while you're at it. In fact, I have a question I'd like a straight answer on: do you intend to make serious edits to Misplaced Pages? -- SCZenz 07:24, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Here's a serious edit for you - Arch Hall Jr. sucks. That real enough for ya? Archjr
- Not really. I have to say I can't see why, if you plan to use this account only for attacks and vandalism, it shouldn't be blocked. The question, really, is will you or will you not continue to delete material from articles, create hoax pages, and attack users? -- SCZenz 07:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Gosh, you're right, that sentence was overcomplicated. But, since you know what I meant perfectly well, you can answer the question. -- SCZenz 07:57, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- YES!!!!(Way to delete my signed comment. Nice double standard.)Archjr
- Gosh, you're right, that sentence was overcomplicated. But, since you know what I meant perfectly well, you can answer the question. -- SCZenz 07:57, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Not really. I have to say I can't see why, if you plan to use this account only for attacks and vandalism, it shouldn't be blocked. The question, really, is will you or will you not continue to delete material from articles, create hoax pages, and attack users? -- SCZenz 07:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC)