| Revision as of 17:02, 27 January 2010 editVerbal (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers21,940 edits →problem?: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:30, 27 January 2010 edit undoLudwigs2 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,240 edits →problem?: once more, so we are clearNext edit → | ||
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
| ::so, again, if you have an issue with me or my edits, please approach me directly about it. if you're not willing to communicate, then as far as I am concerned you lose the right to complain. --] 09:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | ::so, again, if you have an issue with me or my edits, please approach me directly about it. if you're not willing to communicate, then as far as I am concerned you lose the right to complain. --] 09:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::: Your definition of response seems faulty - it's directly between your two comments (that would be a form of communication too). There is a user talk page for talking to users directly (like you are using here), or email. Don't sully article talk pages, thanks.<span style="font-family:Papyrus">] <small>]</small></span> 17:02, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | ::: Your definition of response seems faulty - it's directly between your two comments (that would be a form of communication too). There is a user talk page for talking to users directly (like you are using here), or email. Don't sully article talk pages, thanks.<span style="font-family:Papyrus">] <small>]</small></span> 17:02, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Had you taken similar action with respect to BullRangifer's much more direct incivility, I could possibly credit you with a degree of dispassionate interest in the matter. but you didn't, so I can't. so, ''again,'' if you have a personal issue with me or my edits, please approach me directly about it. do not continue to revert my edits using only edit summaries. --] 17:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == FYI == | == FYI == | ||
Revision as of 17:30, 27 January 2010
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:29, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
| ||||
Content
|
|
Unblock
Hi there. I hope to prove you wrong, and I suppose a good start would be here. I'm sorry for any personal attacks I made against you, WP can become a stressful place, things seem to have a way of escalating. Macromonkey (talk) 19:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, all the best. Verbal chat 20:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
CRU Hack Rename
Personally I think an enforcement action should be investigated - there are a lot of experienced editors behaving badly on that rename page. They should know better. That makes it more important to bring this to discussion, not less. That was some of the ugliest stuff I've seen by people that I don't think are completely crazy. Ignignot (talk) 22:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
problem?
If you have an issue with me or my edits, please approach me directly about it. arguments by reversion/edit summary are not an effective way to resolve a dispute. --Ludwigs2 22:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- that was non-responsive. I certainly have the right to ask another editor to stop insulting me, and to tell him I will take him to ANI if he continues. neither of these would be considered uncivil or threatening, and neither would be grounds for refactoring my talk page comments.
- so, again, if you have an issue with me or my edits, please approach me directly about it. if you're not willing to communicate, then as far as I am concerned you lose the right to complain. --Ludwigs2 09:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Your definition of response seems faulty - it's directly between your two comments (that would be a form of communication too). There is a user talk page for talking to users directly (like you are using here), or email. Don't sully article talk pages, thanks.Verbal chat 17:02, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- so, again, if you have an issue with me or my edits, please approach me directly about it. if you're not willing to communicate, then as far as I am concerned you lose the right to complain. --Ludwigs2 09:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Had you taken similar action with respect to BullRangifer's much more direct incivility, I could possibly credit you with a degree of dispassionate interest in the matter. but you didn't, so I can't. so, again, if you have a personal issue with me or my edits, please approach me directly about it. do not continue to revert my edits using only edit summaries. --Ludwigs2 17:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
FYI
Hi, there is a review started that may be of interest to you. Thought you might be interested. Hope all is well, --CrohnieGal 12:39, 27 January 2010 (UTC)