Revision as of 01:12, 14 February 2010 view sourceMBisanz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users126,668 edits →Zeno's paradoxes: archive as impossible at 0/8/0/0← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:42, 14 February 2010 view source Newyorkbrad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,490 edits →Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/0): comment, tally now 0/0/0/1Next edit → | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
:''This area is used for notes by non-recused Clerks.'' | :''This area is used for notes by non-recused Clerks.'' | ||
=== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/ |
=== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/1) === | ||
*Awaiting statements. ] (]) 02:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
* |
Revision as of 02:42, 14 February 2010
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
Request for Permanent, Site-Wide Ban on Asgardian | 13 February 2010 | {{{votes}}} |
Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsRequest name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Amendment request: American politics 2 | none | (orig. case) | 15 January 2025 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Requests for arbitration
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|
Request for Permanent, Site-Wide Ban on Asgardian
Initiated by Nightscream (talk) at 21:36, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Nightscream (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Asgardian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- BOZ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Tenebrae (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Asgardian-Tenebrae
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Asgardian
- Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment/Asgardian
Statement by Nightscream
Over the past few years, many members of the community have attempted unsuccessfully to resolve the issue of User:Asgardian's serial violations of WP:OWN, WP:WAR, WP:ES, WP:CONSENSUS, WP:EDSUM, WP:SOCK, WP:POINT, and WP:CIVIL, and his use of WP:GAME-type behavior when said community attempts to address these offenses. His refusal to respond in an honest or civil manner during these attempts at resolution, most recently during his RfC, make it clear that the only way to prevent future abuse by him is to ban him permanently from Misplaced Pages. While I would not be averse to allowing him to return in say, a year, I would only favor this if he openly discusses the inappropriate nature of the behavior I have described here, directly answer questions about it, and agree to abandon that behavior, sincerely, and without further evasion. Barring this, he should be permanently blocked from editing. Evidence of his policy violations, both during edit disputes, and when his behavior is called into question, is copious, and will be furnished by me (and presumably others) when the case is opened.
Statement by NuclearWarfare
I am just idly asking, but is there any reason why this cannot be handled by an uninvolved administrator issuing an indefinite block if they feel that is appropriate, and defending it at ANI if necessary? NW (Talk) 23:51, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Statement by {Party 3}
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by non-recused Clerks.
Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/1)
- Awaiting statements. Newyorkbrad (talk) 02:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC)