| Revision as of 15:11, 2 March 2010 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Labattblueboy/Archive 1.← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:44, 2 March 2010 edit undoGrk1011 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,483 edits →Clergy naming convention: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| The ] selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up ] by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the ] and in the ] on the coordinator page.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 21:53, 1 March 2010 (UTC)</small> | The ] selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up ] by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the ] and in the ] on the coordinator page.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 21:53, 1 March 2010 (UTC)</small> | ||
| == Clergy naming convention == | |||
| Could you please move back all of those clergy pages you moved to the correct titles? Per ], "Metropolitan" and the like are supposed to be used. If there is some reason I do not know about, it would have helped if you had included an edit summary explaining ''why'' you moved them, not just what you did. Thanks. ] (]) 22:44, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:44, 2 March 2010
Welcome!
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
ANI notification
Hey dude, sorry to do this to you but you are being discussed on WP:AN/I#Bounty board template. Unfortunately, you have been accused of self-aggrandizement and disruption. I know this to be incorrect, and I will defend you to the hilt, but I think you might want to make a comment there. Your bounty is also being constantly removed from Talk:Blenheim Palace. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) 14:07, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Just in case
If you are feeling aggrieved, bewildered or both, over recent events there is a discussion at my talkpage where you may or may not find some enlightenment. Participation is not required, but will be responded to. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:48, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 19:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Mikemoral♪♫ 19:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Climatic Research Unit hacking incident
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Climatic Research Unit hacking incident, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- TS 22:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:53, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Clergy naming convention
Could you please move back all of those clergy pages you moved to the correct titles? Per the naming convention, "Metropolitan" and the like are supposed to be used. If there is some reason I do not know about, it would have helped if you had included an edit summary explaining why you moved them, not just what you did. Thanks. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 22:44, 2 March 2010 (UTC)