| Revision as of 02:04, 4 March 2010 editUnitanode (talk | contribs)Rollbackers6,424 editsm Reverted edits by Rjd0060 (talk) to last version by Unitanode← Previous edit |
Revision as of 02:34, 4 March 2010 edit undoUnitanode (talk | contribs)Rollbackers6,424 edits you know what? fuck this. when Durova can post unrelated diffs that are not personal attacks, and get someone blocked, this project is fucked beyond belief. good byeNext edit → |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 2px solid Gold; background: Black; line-height:1.5" |
|
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 2px solid Gold; background: Black; line-height:1.5" |
|
|<center><b><font color="white">Because of certain family health concerns, and the inanity of many of the administrators, {{BASEPAGENAME}} will not be on Misplaced Pages for an indefinite period of time.</center></b></font> |
|
|<center><b><font color="white">Because of certain family health concerns, and the inanity of many of the administrators, {{BASEPAGENAME}} will not be on Misplaced Pages for an indefinite period of time.</center></b></font> |
|
⚫ |
|} |
|
|}*Note: the only exceptions I will be making to this notice are when I post off-line work I do for the WikiCup. 18:26, 28 February 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
;About My PROD tagging |
|
|
|
|
|
The discretion I use when deciding whether or not to place a PROD tag on a BLP is simple: is it referenced? If not, I place a tag. If it's poorly referenced, I look a bit deeper, and either place the tag, or stub-ify. I never take much more than a minute or so, and I'm not going to research 50K+ unreferenced BLPs. The tagging has worked, as several of the articles are now being sourced. I'm not going to stop doing it, so I respectfully ask that any notifications that someone has removed the PROD (while adding references) leave out any lectures on that issue. It's not going to change. |
|
|
---- |
|
|
'''] is where I will be manually archiving any DYK or ITN notices.''' |
|
|
---- |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|archiveheader = {{archivemainpage|User talk:Unitanode}} |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|
|
|counter = 5 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
|algo = old(3d) |
|
|
|archive = User talk:Unitanode/Archive %(counter)d |
|
| ⚫ |
}} |
|
|
{{Talkheader}} |
|
|
{{auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I|age=3|small=yes}} |
|
|
{{archivebox|auto=yes|search=yes}} |
|
|
---- |
|
|
''I edit some political articles; please read this before accusing me of bias.''<p> |
|
|
<u>My votes in the last four presidential elections</u>: Clinton, Bush, Bush, Obama. I do not have a bias for (or against) any political party. |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
== WikiCup 2010 February newsletter == |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
Round one is over, and round two has begun! Congratulations to the 64 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our first round. A special well done goes to {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant|Sasata}}, our round one winner (1010 points), and to {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant|Hunter Kahn}} and {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant|TonyTheTiger}}, who were second and third respectively (640 points/605 points). Sasata was awarded the most points for both good articles (300 points) and featured articles (600 points), and TonyTheTiger was awarded the most for featured topics (225 points), while Hunter Kahn claimed the most for good topics (70). {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant|Staxringold}} claimed the most featured lists (240 points) and featured pictures (35 points), {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant|Geschichte}} claimed the most for ''Did you know?'' entries (490 points), {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant|Jujutacular}} claimed the most for featured sounds (70 points) and {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant|Candlewicke}} claimed the most for ''In the news'' entries (40 points). No one claimed a featured portal or valued picture. |
|
|
|
|
|
Credits awarded after the end of round one but before round two may be claimed in round two, but remember the rule that content must have been worked on in some significant way during 2010 by you for you to claim points. The groups for round two will be placed up shortly, and the submissions' pages will be blanked. This round will continue until 28 April, when the top two users from each group, as well as 16 wildcards, will progress to round three. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup; thank you to all doing this last round, and particularly to those helping at ]. As ever, questions are welcome on ] and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from ].</small> ], ], ] and ] <small>Delivered by ] (]) at 00:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC)</small> |
|