| Revision as of 03:21, 4 March 2010 editBehnamFarid (talk | contribs)6,317 edits →File:Ebrahim Pourdavoud.jpg← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:36, 4 March 2010 edit undoStifle (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators84,094 edits →File:Ebrahim Pourdavoud.jpgNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| * Questionable sourcing. I strongly doubt this image is user-made. ] (]) 00:46, 4 March 2010 (UTC) | * Questionable sourcing. I strongly doubt this image is user-made. ] (]) 00:46, 4 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| * The image is '''not''' user-made!!! The image is the ''personal property'' of the person I have explicitly named (namely ] --- is the original source file) on the page at issue, i.e. . On the original page on Persian Misplaced Pages, the person introduces himself as the '''owner''' of the image and releases the image to public domain because he so desires. Now User:Milburn, please tell us where your "strong" "doubt" is based on? And, where do you have the term "user-made" from? There is nowhere any mention of "user-made", leading me to suspect that you just made the term up to advance your cause. There is a fundamental difference between "I, the copyright holder", and "I, the maker". Will you have the courage to apologise for so ungentlemanly casting doubt on the integrity of my statement? In any case, you must certainly tell us what is "questionable" about the sourcing. Incidentally, the photograph at issue was days ago considered by ], and he had no problem with it (he was briefly confused by mistaking the date of my upload by the date of the release of the image, the copyright statement with which I had originally uploaded the image to English Misplaced Pages being PD-Iran --- see ). ] | * The image is '''not''' user-made!!! The image is the ''personal property'' of the person I have explicitly named (namely ] --- is the original source file) on the page at issue, i.e. . On the original page on Persian Misplaced Pages, the person introduces himself as the '''owner''' of the image and releases the image to public domain because he so desires. Now User:Milburn, please tell us where your "strong" "doubt" is based on? And, where do you have the term "user-made" from? There is nowhere any mention of "user-made", leading me to suspect that you just made the term up to advance your cause. There is a fundamental difference between "I, the copyright holder", and "I, the maker". Will you have the courage to apologise for so ungentlemanly casting doubt on the integrity of my statement? In any case, you must certainly tell us what is "questionable" about the sourcing. Incidentally, the photograph at issue was days ago considered by ], and he had no problem with it (he was briefly confused by mistaking the date of my upload by the date of the release of the image, the copyright statement with which I had originally uploaded the image to English Misplaced Pages being PD-Iran --- see ). ] | ||
| *Looks more like a case for {{tl|sofixit}} on the mistagging, to be honest. ] (]) 10:36, 4 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
Revision as of 10:36, 4 March 2010
| < March 3 | March 5 > |
|---|
March 4
File:Ebrahim Pourdavoud.jpg
- File:Ebrahim Pourdavoud.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Questionable sourcing. I strongly doubt this image is user-made. J Milburn (talk) 00:46, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- The image is not user-made!!! The image is the personal property of the person I have explicitly named (namely fa:User:Niabehzad --- this is the original source file) on the page at issue, i.e. here. On the original page on Persian Misplaced Pages, the person introduces himself as the owner of the image and releases the image to public domain because he so desires. Now User:Milburn, please tell us where your "strong" "doubt" is based on? And, where do you have the term "user-made" from? There is nowhere any mention of "user-made", leading me to suspect that you just made the term up to advance your cause. There is a fundamental difference between "I, the copyright holder", and "I, the maker". Will you have the courage to apologise for so ungentlemanly casting doubt on the integrity of my statement? In any case, you must certainly tell us what is "questionable" about the sourcing. Incidentally, the photograph at issue was days ago considered by User:Feydey, and he had no problem with it (he was briefly confused by mistaking the date of my upload by the date of the release of the image, the copyright statement with which I had originally uploaded the image to English Misplaced Pages being PD-Iran --- see here). --BF 03:17, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- Looks more like a case for {{sofixit}} on the mistagging, to be honest. Stifle (talk) 10:36, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
File:Type IXc Reynaga.jpg
- File:Type IXc Reynaga.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- User claims it is his own work. However, it appears to be a scan of the box cover of a model. In this case, the art would by copyrighted, and this would be a copyvio. NativeForeigner /Contribs 01:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
