| Revision as of 22:18, 15 December 2010 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,345 editsm Signing comment by 69.22.185.186 - "→Savillo: "← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:10, 15 December 2010 edit undoCurtisSwain (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,232 edits →Savillo: reply to message on my talk pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| :The sentence I removed had a to Savillo. If just I said "Sentence removed," the sentence I would be referring to would be ambiguous. I didn't mean to imply anything beyond that. --CaC ] (]) 21:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | :The sentence I removed had a to Savillo. If just I said "Sentence removed," the sentence I would be referring to would be ambiguous. I didn't mean to imply anything beyond that. --CaC ] (]) 21:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| I don't think so. You did that directly sacrificing someone's name when he doesn't even know that his name is being cited. This still needs to be heard. You have to pay for it. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:17, 15 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | I don't think so. You did that directly sacrificing someone's name when he doesn't even know that his name is being cited. This still needs to be heard. You have to pay for it. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:17, 15 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| :To CaC 155.99.230.57: | |||
| :I'm not sure what's going on here, and I'm definitely not involved, but this kind of sounds like a ] that you might want to report to ] or an ].--] (]) 23:10, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:10, 15 December 2010
Savillo
I can accuse in court , Savillo never wrote this.. why sentence by Savillo????— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.31.68.51 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- The sentence I removed had a citation to Savillo. If just I said "Sentence removed," the sentence I would be referring to would be ambiguous. I didn't mean to imply anything beyond that. --CaC 155.99.230.57 (talk) 21:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
I don't think so. You did that directly sacrificing someone's name when he doesn't even know that his name is being cited. This still needs to be heard. You have to pay for it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.22.185.186 (talk) 22:17, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- To CaC 155.99.230.57:
- I'm not sure what's going on here, and I'm definitely not involved, but this kind of sounds like a threat that you might want to report to Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or an administrator.--CurtisSwain (talk) 23:10, 15 December 2010 (UTC)