| Revision as of 01:08, 28 April 2011 editCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 edits →Civility parole: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:22, 28 April 2011 edit undoCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 edits →Civility parole: wider warning with regard to recent revert warring and general breaches of WP:GS/BINext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| LevenBoy you are under civility restriction. Your edits on April 26th 2011 are in violation of ]. You have had ample time since this restriction was imposed to learn to use wikipedia properly and to behave in a civil and collegial manner. Further edits in this vein will result in sanctions. <br/>Also, please stop using wikipedia noticeboards to make a point. If you are in dispute with other editors ]--] <sup>]</sup> 01:08, 28 April 2011 (UTC) | LevenBoy you are under civility restriction. Your edits on April 26th 2011 are in violation of ]. You have had ample time since this restriction was imposed to learn to use wikipedia properly and to behave in a civil and collegial manner. Further edits in this vein will result in sanctions. <br/>Also, please stop using wikipedia noticeboards to make a point. If you are in dispute with other editors ]--] <sup>]</sup> 01:08, 28 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| In reference to above warnings for edit-warring. I will give you this single final warning under the term of the ]. Further revert warring over the use of British Isles (alteration, insertion or removal) whether in one article or across many will result in this account being topic banned altogether from everything (articles, talk pages, portals, DYKs, categories, xfds, etc, and discussions on noticeboards about the topic and/or any edits related to it) to do with the British Isles topic area - this would be an imposition of sanction TB02 from ]. <br/>You are experienced editor at this point LevenBoy. You have had warnings, you've had time to adjust, and the community has tried remedial restrictions (civility parole), if this account continues to ] or to use the ] it will simply be placed under further restriction--] <sup>]</sup> 01:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:22, 28 April 2011
April 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Peter Edwards (artist). Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You and your alter ego are not engaging with the content issue on the talk page, but are simply reverting with misleading edit summaries to boot. --Snowded 17:53, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Neil Robertson (snooker player). Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Armbrust Contribs 20:47, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Civility parole
LevenBoy you are under civility restriction. Your edits on April 26th 2011 are in violation of that restriction. You have had ample time since this restriction was imposed to learn to use wikipedia properly and to behave in a civil and collegial manner. Further edits in this vein will result in sanctions.
Also, please stop using wikipedia noticeboards to make a point. If you are in dispute with other editors disengage from them and try dispute resolution--Cailil 01:08, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
In reference to above warnings for edit-warring. I will give you this single final warning under the term of the British Isles topic probation. Further revert warring over the use of British Isles (alteration, insertion or removal) whether in one article or across many will result in this account being topic banned altogether from everything (articles, talk pages, portals, DYKs, categories, xfds, etc, and discussions on noticeboards about the topic and/or any edits related to it) to do with the British Isles topic area - this would be an imposition of sanction TB02 from WP:GS/BI.
You are experienced editor at this point LevenBoy. You have had warnings, you've had time to adjust, and the community has tried remedial restrictions (civility parole), if this account continues to disrupt wikipedia or to use the wikipedia pages to make a point it will simply be placed under further restriction--Cailil 01:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)