| Revision as of 10:17, 14 December 2012 editJASpencer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers84,172 edits →Citation requests...: And I've asked for the citations again← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:32, 16 December 2012 edit undoRiverStyx23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,112 edits →POV Cite Warning: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
| There are already over 100 citations in the Freemasonry article. Anything that is easily verifiable does not need to be cited, and there are no direct quotes involved. Citations have been provided elsewhere, as you have been informed on the NPOV noticeboard under the discussion you started, and also no the Continental Freemasonry talkpage; if you don't want to add them in, you have no right to complain about the lack of them. ] (]) 05:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC) | There are already over 100 citations in the Freemasonry article. Anything that is easily verifiable does not need to be cited, and there are no direct quotes involved. Citations have been provided elsewhere, as you have been informed on the NPOV noticeboard under the discussion you started, and also no the Continental Freemasonry talkpage; if you don't want to add them in, you have no right to complain about the lack of them. ] (]) 05:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :And I moved it back because it has not been verified. As neither you nor Blueboar have provided explicit verification of the term "Irregular Freemasonry" being used in this context (and not to refer to those outside the UGLE subset), I think it's time to give up the ghost on this. ] (]) 10:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC) | :And I moved it back because it has not been verified. As neither you nor Blueboar have provided explicit verification of the term "Irregular Freemasonry" being used in this context (and not to refer to those outside the UGLE subset), I think it's time to give up the ghost on this. ] (]) 10:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == POV Cite Warning == | |||
| If you have a concern about an article or its edits or whatever it is best discussed at the article's talk page. Please don't insert irrelevant comments or position statements into someone else's conversation. While public, and arising out of MSJapan's edit summary, my question to him had nothing to do with his position, or yours, on the article in question.<br /><span style="font-family:Georgia">]</span>{<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub>} 02:32, 16 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:32, 16 December 2012
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Nomination of Feast of the Guardian Angels for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Feast of the Guardian Angels is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Feast of the Guardian Angels until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello JASpencer! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Misplaced Pages and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation. |
Ichthus: January 2012
 |
ICHTHUS |
| January 2012 |
In this issue...
- From the Editor
- What are You doing For Lent?
- Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
- Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
No personal attack ...
Hello, JA. Thanks for this message. I never for one moment thought that it was a personal attack. Anyone sensitive enough to be really offended by my remark is probably unlikely to survive Misplaced Pages for long. I suppose that my remark might be regarded as a little uncivil, and maybe it would have been better, as I said, to express the point differently, but there was no way I could have expected such an absurd over-reaction. Oh well, ... JamesBWatson (talk) 11:00, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Conspiracy of the Equals (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Rentier
- Ernesto Nathan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to ATAC
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Balls Picture
Now, there's a section heading...
Good spot on this - although afaik CC BY-SA 2.0 images (as this one is) are OK aren't they? No worries - I'm happy with either image to be honest. Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:10, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Reviewer
Hello, following a review of your contributions, I have enabled reviewer rights on your account. This gives you the ability to:
- Accept changes on pages undergoing pending changes,
- Have your changes automatically accepted on pending changes level 2 protected pages, and
- Administrate article feedback.
Please remember that this user right:
- Can be removed at any time for misuse, and
- Does not grant you any special status above other editors.
- You should probably also read WP:PROTECT, since this user privilege deals largely with page protection. As the requirements for this privilege are still in a state of flux, I would encourage you to keep up to date on the WP:REVIEWER page. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions! Happy editing! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:25, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- General Roman Calendar of 1962 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Domitilla
- Saints Nereus and Achilleus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Pope Damasus
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Citation requests...
There are already over 100 citations in the Freemasonry article. Anything that is easily verifiable does not need to be cited, and there are no direct quotes involved. Citations have been provided elsewhere, as you have been informed on the NPOV noticeboard under the discussion you started, and also no the Continental Freemasonry talkpage; if you don't want to add them in, you have no right to complain about the lack of them. MSJapan (talk) 05:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- And I moved it back because it has not been verified. As neither you nor Blueboar have provided explicit verification of the term "Irregular Freemasonry" being used in this context (and not to refer to those outside the UGLE subset), I think it's time to give up the ghost on this. JASpencer (talk) 10:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
POV Cite Warning
If you have a concern about an article or its edits or whatever it is best discussed at the article's talk page. Please don't insert irrelevant comments or position statements into someone else's conversation. While public, and arising out of MSJapan's edit summary, my question to him had nothing to do with his position, or yours, on the article in question.
kcylsnavS{harrass} 02:32, 16 December 2012 (UTC)