| Revision as of 20:09, 11 March 2013 editDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators407,389 edits →False accusations of vandalism are a serious matter← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:24, 11 March 2013 edit undoJohnny Squeaky (talk | contribs)2,359 edits →False accusations of vandalism are a serious matterNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| :::Ah! So the person repeatedly removing my legitimate addition of the Trivia template has no responsibility not to remove a legitimate template? I see. Yes, this is typical, editors with ] issues, but get away with it because they have Admin friends who are willing to strong-arm other editors. It’s pretty common at Misplaced Pages, and is one of the primary reasons that editors flee. Yes, I understand now, you are threatening me with having my account banned. Why not just say it? =//= ] 19:49, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | :::Ah! So the person repeatedly removing my legitimate addition of the Trivia template has no responsibility not to remove a legitimate template? I see. Yes, this is typical, editors with ] issues, but get away with it because they have Admin friends who are willing to strong-arm other editors. It’s pretty common at Misplaced Pages, and is one of the primary reasons that editors flee. Yes, I understand now, you are threatening me with having my account banned. Why not just say it? =//= ] 19:49, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Your admin conspiracy song was already tedious last time you popped it in the 8-track player, and it hasn't improved. You were wrong, you edited against the consensus of three or more editors, and of course it's someone else's fault. Denying that you were edit-warring is, well, stupid since it flies in the face of reality. It's called "]" and really needs an article. ] (]) 20:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | ::::Your admin conspiracy song was already tedious last time you popped it in the 8-track player, and it hasn't improved. You were wrong, you edited against the consensus of three or more editors, and of course it's someone else's fault. Denying that you were edit-warring is, well, stupid since it flies in the face of reality. It's called "]" and really needs an article. ] (]) 20:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :::::Your comments are offensive and threatening. It's a very sad thing that you have immunity to make such statemnents which are factually untrue. I'm done listening to your threatening comments, though I'm sure you will run to one of your Admin friends to have me banned. Sad, just very very sad. =//= ] 20:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:24, 11 March 2013
This Page Intentionally Left Blank =//= Johnny Squeaky 17:32, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Robert Swift
This discussion might interest you. Zagalejo^^^ 03:13, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
False accusations of vandalism are a serious matter
Thank you for trying to keep Misplaced Pages free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Medgar Evers, are not considered vandalism under Misplaced Pages policy. Misplaced Pages has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Misplaced Pages:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:30, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Medgar Evers. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:30, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Are you serious? "Personal attacks"? No such thing took place. 132.3.65.78 (talk) 19:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
And edit warring is a serious matter as well, as you should remember from last year. I think you've reverted seven or eight times by now and the only reason I'm not blocking you immediately is that I have good faith in humanity. But one more revert and you will be blocked, and one more personal attack and you will be blocked longer. Drmies (talk) 18:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- I am not involved in an "edit war". I simply added a Trivia tag to some Trivia. 132.3.65.78 (talk) 19:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- You are repeatedly adding the same removed material. That is edit warring. Making accusations of vandalism against editors who merely disagree with you counts as personal attack. I'd suggest you back it up before you get blocked. Span (talk) 19:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Ah! So the person repeatedly removing my legitimate addition of the Trivia template has no responsibility not to remove a legitimate template? I see. Yes, this is typical, editors with WP:OWN issues, but get away with it because they have Admin friends who are willing to strong-arm other editors. It’s pretty common at Misplaced Pages, and is one of the primary reasons that editors flee. Yes, I understand now, you are threatening me with having my account banned. Why not just say it? =//= Johnny Squeaky 19:49, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Your admin conspiracy song was already tedious last time you popped it in the 8-track player, and it hasn't improved. You were wrong, you edited against the consensus of three or more editors, and of course it's someone else's fault. Denying that you were edit-warring is, well, stupid since it flies in the face of reality. It's called "Primary process lying" and really needs an article. Drmies (talk) 20:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Your comments are offensive and threatening. It's a very sad thing that you have immunity to make such statemnents which are factually untrue. I'm done listening to your threatening comments, though I'm sure you will run to one of your Admin friends to have me banned. Sad, just very very sad. =//= Johnny Squeaky 20:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Your admin conspiracy song was already tedious last time you popped it in the 8-track player, and it hasn't improved. You were wrong, you edited against the consensus of three or more editors, and of course it's someone else's fault. Denying that you were edit-warring is, well, stupid since it flies in the face of reality. It's called "Primary process lying" and really needs an article. Drmies (talk) 20:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Ah! So the person repeatedly removing my legitimate addition of the Trivia template has no responsibility not to remove a legitimate template? I see. Yes, this is typical, editors with WP:OWN issues, but get away with it because they have Admin friends who are willing to strong-arm other editors. It’s pretty common at Misplaced Pages, and is one of the primary reasons that editors flee. Yes, I understand now, you are threatening me with having my account banned. Why not just say it? =//= Johnny Squeaky 19:49, 11 March 2013 (UTC)