| Revision as of 02:35, 8 July 2013 editDaniel Case (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators225,342 edits →Belated reply: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:07, 8 July 2013 edit undoMadeYourReadThis (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers97,136 edits →Belated replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| Re : If your ego is ''that'' badly bruised by a UAA report being rejected, soak it in cold water or give it a rest for a while. (And think ... do you really want this exchange being dredged up if you ever request adminship? It would cost you votes, believe me). ] (]) 02:35, 8 July 2013 (UTC) | Re : If your ego is ''that'' badly bruised by a UAA report being rejected, soak it in cold water or give it a rest for a while. (And think ... do you really want this exchange being dredged up if you ever request adminship? It would cost you votes, believe me). ] (]) 02:35, 8 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :Read my user page. I dont want adminship. There are too many admins like you who focus so much on retaining bad editors that it endangers the project as a whole. I just hope Intel doesn't have an issue with your decision to retain a user which could easily be seen as speaking for the company.--] (]) 03:07, 8 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:07, 8 July 2013
|
Belated reply
Re this: If your ego is that badly bruised by a UAA report being rejected, soak it in cold water or give it a rest for a while. (And think ... do you really want this exchange being dredged up if you ever request adminship? It would cost you votes, believe me). Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Read my user page. I dont want adminship. There are too many admins like you who focus so much on retaining bad editors that it endangers the project as a whole. I just hope Intel doesn't have an issue with your decision to retain a user which could easily be seen as speaking for the company.--RadioFan (talk) 03:07, 8 July 2013 (UTC)