User talk:MadeYourReadThis: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 03:07, 8 July 2013 editMadeYourReadThis (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers97,136 edits →Belated reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:09, 8 July 2013 edit undoMadeYourReadThis (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers97,136 edits →Belated reply Next edit →
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Re : If your ego is ''that'' badly bruised by a UAA report being rejected, soak it in cold water or give it a rest for a while. (And think ... do you really want this exchange being dredged up if you ever request adminship? It would cost you votes, believe me). ] (]) 02:35, 8 July 2013 (UTC)		Re : If your ego is ''that'' badly bruised by a UAA report being rejected, soak it in cold water or give it a rest for a while. (And think ... do you really want this exchange being dredged up if you ever request adminship? It would cost you votes, believe me). ] (]) 02:35, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
	:Read my user page. I dont want adminship. There are too many admins like you who focus so much on retaining bad editors that it endangers the project as a whole. I ~~just~~ hope Intel doesn't have an issue with your decision to retain a user which could easily be seen as speaking for the company.--] (]) 03:07, 8 July 2013 (UTC)		:Read my user page. I dont want adminship. There are too many admins like you who focus so much on retaining bad editors that it endangers the project as a whole. I can help the project much more by questioning admins actions when necessary. I hope your ego isn't that badly brused that a non-admin questioned your decision. I much more hope Intel doesn't have an issue with your decision to retain a user which could easily be seen as speaking for the company.--] (]) 03:07, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:09, 8 July 2013

This user is one of the 250 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

Editors with Article For Creation questions are encouraged to ask questions here. If your question is "can you review my article again", you'll get much faster results by clicking on the link in the red notice box which starts When you are ready to resubmit

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Belated reply

Re this: If your ego is that badly bruised by a UAA report being rejected, soak it in cold water or give it a rest for a while. (And think ... do you really want this exchange being dredged up if you ever request adminship? It would cost you votes, believe me). Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Read my user page. I dont want adminship. There are too many admins like you who focus so much on retaining bad editors that it endangers the project as a whole. I can help the project much more by questioning admins actions when necessary. I hope your ego isn't that badly brused that a non-admin questioned your decision. I much more hope Intel doesn't have an issue with your decision to retain a user which could easily be seen as speaking for the company.--RadioFan (talk) 03:07, 8 July 2013 (UTC)