User talk:Nosepea68: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 01:12, 24 October 2013 editNumbermaniac (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers17,934 edits Your submission at Articles for creation (AFCH beta)← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:27, 24 October 2013 edit undoNorthBySouthBaranof (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,477 edits Your submission at Articles for creation (AFCH)Next edit →
Line 73:		Line 73:
	*You can also get .		*You can also get .
	:Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages! <span class=nowrap> -- ] ] ]</span> 01:12, 24 October 2013 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline--></div>		:Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages! <span class=nowrap> -- ] ] ]</span> 01:12, 24 October 2013 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline--></div>
			== Your submission at AfC ] was accepted ==
			<div style="
			border:solid 1px #57DB1E;
			background:#E6FFE6;
			padding:1em;
			padding-top:0.5em;
			padding-bottom:0.5em;
			width:20em;
			color:black;
			margin-bottom: 1.5em;
			margin-left: 1.5em;
			width: 90%;
			">] '''], which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br> The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on the article's ]. You may like to take a look at the ] to see how you can improve the article.
			You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to ]. {{#if:{{#invoke:IPAddress\|isIp\|1=Nosepea68}}
			\|You may wish to consider ] so you can create articles yourself
			\|Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can ], and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to ] if you prefer
			}}.
			* If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the ''']'''.
			* If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link\|page=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Articles for creation\|text=leaving us some feedback}}.
			Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
			] (]) 08:27, 24 October 2013 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk-->

Revision as of 08:27, 24 October 2013

Welcome!

Hello, Nosepea68, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Diego (talk) 09:56, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Be careful at talk pages

Please be careful with other people's comments when editing talk pages. You have removed with this edit the comment I posted after your commentary at Talk:Anita Sarkeesian. Diego (talk) 13:28, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. NeilN 16:33, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Talk pages again

Can you please read Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines. You're still not signing your posts properly and now you're top posting and adding incorrect templates. --NeilN 19:00, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Sure

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Nosepea68! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Anita Sarkeesian. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Your deliberate falsifying of a title of a source is particularly disruptive. NeilN 00:06, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Anita Sarkeesian. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:07, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Anita Sarkeesian. ///EuroCarGT 00:08, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at Anita Sarkeesian, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Cúchullain /c 00:11, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

--Orange Mike | Talk 00:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

For fucks sake,

I am a n00b I admit, reason I flagged all Anita Sarkeesian parts was because I thought that is how to do it. I sincerely did not know my editing every single part (that a proper saying?) was counted as spam. Seriously I thought that after editing a part you must save them for later use.

Obviously that wasn't the case.

After all. I would like to have OrangeMike's Skype handle so I could discus this matter more closely or I can PM him with mine to continue this conversation.

Why did you falsify the title of a source? Why did you stop only after you were blocked and not before and ask questions as to why you were being reverted? --NeilN 01:18, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

If I remember correctly (you know no normal human memory is perfect), I had several tabs open in firefox and refreshed the main article every now and then to see my edits appearance and I was sleep depraved when I was editing the article. I wanted to POV the article because all the criticism against Sarkeesian's work is refuted as no reliable sources and to me (subjective view, yes!) it seems the article is glorifying Anita Sarkeesian showing only her "misogynistic" harassment. Actually the backlash she got wasn't against females per se but against her as a person.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropes vs. Women in Video Games (October 24)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Misplaced Pages:Articles for creation/Tropes vs. Women in Video Games.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages! -- numbermaniac 01:12, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Tropes vs. Women in Video Games was accepted

Tropes vs. Women in Video Games, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!

NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 08:27, 24 October 2013 (UTC)