| Revision as of 13:47, 24 November 2013 editArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators46,400 edits →Scoring: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:35, 24 November 2013 edit undoCollect (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers47,160 edits →Scoring: and you think by asserting that I am somehow dishonest that I will change my mind? what an interesting concept!Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| :: You are not a teacher; we are equals. You should not have expected me not to correct what I considered a misunderstanding in the question: that one arbitrator's private approach does not mean the whole committee ignored the workshop and evidence pages. In your question, you wrongly implied we did. You will vote however you like, and I am frankly not interested in changing your mind, but you should at least be honest about why you are opposing me. At the moment, you are not. I will say nothing more on the matter. Regards, ] ]] 13:47, 24 November 2013 (UTC) | :: You are not a teacher; we are equals. You should not have expected me not to correct what I considered a misunderstanding in the question: that one arbitrator's private approach does not mean the whole committee ignored the workshop and evidence pages. In your question, you wrongly implied we did. You will vote however you like, and I am frankly not interested in changing your mind, but you should at least be honest about why you are opposing me. At the moment, you are not. I will say nothing more on the matter. Regards, ] ]] 13:47, 24 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :::And if an ''equal'' asked you a question, and you responded by questioning their integrity, how well do you think that "equal" would grade you? And asserting that I acted '''wrongfully''' here is also ''less than likely'' to impress me. As fotr your inane and inapt accusation that you "know" why I oppose you, such is the stuff of madness -- I used the answers to the questions as my sole criterion here, and to assert otherwise is a gross abuse of Misplaced Pages. You may ask Andy the Grump, Snowded, TFD, Ikip or ''many others'' whether I hold "grudges" and you will find that I do not. I have been online for well over thirty years now, dealt with ''over'' a hundred thousand users, read more than four million posts on a single ISP (per contractual obligations), and, frankly, find you to be '''fully unqualified by temperament as demonstrated here by your argumentation and insinuations to be an arbiter of any level at all'''. Cheers. ] (]) 14:35, 24 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:35, 24 November 2013
Awaiting your guide
Eagerly awaiting your guide, Collect. (But now I have to look at all the other guides to find out who the perp is.) --71.163.153.146 (talk) 23:16, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Scoring
You say you are going to evaluate answers in an "impartial manner" and assign values "from 0 to 5 for each answer … In several cases the aim of the question is to get a feeling for the Wikianschauung of the candidate". Could you therefore explain how my seven answers together returned a score of one? AGK 12:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- I noted that accusing a teacher of lying or misrepresentation in the posing of an essay question rarely achieves any grade at all. You did so, and so your grade reflects the demeanor you presented. I hold no animus of any kind towards you at all, but when a person acts as you did in "answering" a question, they ain't gonna love their grade. Cheers.
- You are not a teacher; we are equals. You should not have expected me not to correct what I considered a misunderstanding in the question: that one arbitrator's private approach does not mean the whole committee ignored the workshop and evidence pages. In your question, you wrongly implied we did. You will vote however you like, and I am frankly not interested in changing your mind, but you should at least be honest about why you are opposing me. At the moment, you are not. I will say nothing more on the matter. Regards, AGK 13:47, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- And if an equal asked you a question, and you responded by questioning their integrity, how well do you think that "equal" would grade you? And asserting that I acted wrongfully here is also less than likely to impress me. As fotr your inane and inapt accusation that you "know" why I oppose you, such is the stuff of madness -- I used the answers to the questions as my sole criterion here, and to assert otherwise is a gross abuse of Misplaced Pages. You may ask Andy the Grump, Snowded, TFD, Ikip or many others whether I hold "grudges" and you will find that I do not. I have been online for well over thirty years now, dealt with over a hundred thousand users, read more than four million posts on a single ISP (per contractual obligations), and, frankly, find you to be fully unqualified by temperament as demonstrated here by your argumentation and insinuations to be an arbiter of any level at all. Cheers. Collect (talk) 14:35, 24 November 2013 (UTC)