| Revision as of 11:22, 27 June 2006 editDaveG12345 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,009 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:51, 27 June 2006 edit undoIhcoyc (talk | contribs)30,401 edits →[]: merge and redirectNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| *'''Redirect''' to ], or possibly redirect ] to ]. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 10:36, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Redirect''' to ], or possibly redirect ] to ]. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 10:36, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Canoncruft. --] 11:22, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Canoncruft. --] 11:22, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Merge and redirect''' per trialsanderrors. ] 13:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:51, 27 June 2006
non-canon
Pardon the lengthy nom If you just take a cursory look at the page, it may seem full enough to warrant it's own article. The fact is though, that "Non-canon" is merely a word that has no inherent encyclopedic value. This article is a dicdef--when I found it, the article claimed that "non-canon" is a term used only for anime, but I knew this wasn't true so I attempted to add some information about Biblical non-canon texts, and, reluctantly, Star Wars. But then I realized that I am merely adding examples to a dicdef. The section about anime and manga is merely an explanation about how some stories or comics are "non-canon". It's as if I edited the article for green and added a section about how grass and dollar bills are green. This makes no sense, becasue that information belongs in their respective articles (Grass and dollar). Correspondingly, the anime information belongs in the Anime article. (Or perhaps Dragonball Z.) Articles about words (as opposed to Proper nouns) should explain the definition, nature, and intricacies of the word, and not its existence or occurence in outside phenomena. AdamBiswanger1 01:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Non-keep Dict def of a negative? Doubleunplusgood. Kotepho 01:50, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Non-keep per Kotepho. (It also doesn't specify whether it's the antonym of canon (fiction), Canon Law, Canon law, Biblical canon, etc.) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 01:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Or, for that matter, the musical form. Zetawoof 03:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Difficult to see how this could be anything but a dictionary definition, and not an encyclpedia subject. Tyrenius 02:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, dicdef--TBCTaLk?!? 02:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Non-keep, dicdef. --Coredesat talk 02:43, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Canon (fiction). ~ trialsanderrors 03:06, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Non-non-keep negatives aren't not bad. SM247 05:29, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- delete So the closing admin doesn't get too confused. MichaelBillington 07:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Canon (fiction), or possibly redirect Canon (fiction) to Non-fanon. --Nscheffey 10:36, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Canoncruft. --DaveG12345 11:22, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect per trialsanderrors. Smerdis of Tlön 13:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)