Misplaced Pages

Arrowsmith School: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:24, 4 June 2014 editDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators407,385 edits Delivery Mechanism: not neutral← Previous edit Revision as of 01:30, 4 June 2014 edit undoDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators407,385 edits Ongoing Research: moot: not sourced reliablyNext edit →
Line 42: Line 42:


The other line of research investigated the principle of neuroplasticity, which is the ability of the brain to physically change in response to stimulus and activity, to develop new neuronal/synaptic interconnections and thereby develop and adapt new functions and roles believed to be the physical mechanism of learning. Neuroplasticity refers to structural and functional changes in the brain that are brought about by training and experience. The other line of research investigated the principle of neuroplasticity, which is the ability of the brain to physically change in response to stimulus and activity, to develop new neuronal/synaptic interconnections and thereby develop and adapt new functions and roles believed to be the physical mechanism of learning. Neuroplasticity refers to structural and functional changes in the brain that are brought about by training and experience.

== Ongoing Research ==
Beginning in 1997, Barbara Arrowsmith Young, in collaboration with research colleagues at a number of different educational institutions, has engaged in conducting research looking at the Arrowsmith Program and its effects on the cognitive functions associated with ].

There have been a number of studies that have demonstrated improvements in students’ academic skills upon completion of the Arrowsmith Program cognitive exercises. The increased cognitive capacities have enabled students to acquire a wide range of academic skills. All of the research has demonstrated a clear link between successful completion of the Arrowsmith Program cognitive exercises and improvements in basic academic skills.

=== Studies demonstrating Arrowsmith Program outcomes and acquisition of academic skills ===
Overviews of some of the studies and highlights of the key findings are outlined below.

==== A Report on the Effectiveness of the Arrowsmith Program in the Toronto Catholic District School Board ====
January 2007

This report, prepared from data gathered by teachers in the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) on students enrolled in the Arrowsmith Program between 1997-2007 in the TCDSB, demonstrated that the students’ rate of learning on specific academic tasks (word recognition, arithmetic, reading comprehension and reading speed) increased by 1.5 to 3 times the rate they were learning at prior to the Arrowsmith Program.

The study noted:

''“Specific changes were also noted in cognitive functioning in the areas of: visual memory; auditory memory; logical reasoning; non-verbal problem solving; concentration and focus; number sense; thinking and problem solving; conceptual understanding; and comprehension. The changes in the student’s cognitive capacities led to the increased rate of learning in academic areas.”''<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.arrowsmithschool.org/arrowsmithprogram-background/pdf/academic-skills.pdf|title = Academic Skills and Learning Outcomes|date = |accessdate = |website = |publisher = |last = |first = }}</ref>

==== Report on an Outcome Evaluation of the Arrowsmith Program for Treating Learning Disabled Students, ====
prepared by Dr. William Lancee, November 2005

This study followed students at Arrowsmith School over three years and concluded:

''“The study, combined with previous research of the program, strongly supports the effectiveness of the Arrowsmith Program for a wide spectrum of learning problems. These results provide hope for parents and teachers, and open up opportunities for children struggling with learning difficulties.”''<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.arrowsmithschool.org/arrowsmithprogram-background/pdf/academic-skills.pdf|title = Academic Skills and Learning Outcomes|date = |accessdate = |website = |publisher = |last = |first = }}{{Cite web|url = http://www.arrowsmithschool.org/arrowsmithprogram-background/pdf/academic-skills.pdf|title = Academic Skills and Learning Outcomes|date = |accessdate = |website = |publisher = |last = |first = }}</ref>

==== Report on the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) Study of the Arrowsmith Program for Learning Disabilities ====
prepared by Dr. William Lancee, January 22, 2003

A research study comparing students enrolled in the Arrowsmith Program (AP) with students in a traditional special education program that was conducted over the 2001/2002 school year in the Toronto Catholic District School Board.

The study concludes:

''“Despite some study design limitations and small sample size, the study results strongly support the Arrowsmith Program as instrumental in changing the developmental course of the majority of children with learning disabilities (LD) in this sample. In only 12 months, almost one third of the AP students were on a course that brought them closer to their peers. Another 27% improved their performance at the same rate as expected from their non-LD peers, that is, they stayed at the same distance but did not fall further behind. All other AP students (43%) improved at least somewhat on the various achievement tests. None of the 10 students in the comparison group progressed substantially beyond their entry status.”''<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.arrowsmithschool.org/arrowsmithprogram-background/pdf/academic-skills.pdf|title = Academic Skills and Learning Outcomes|date = |accessdate = |website = |publisher = |last = |first = }}</ref>

==== Changes Observed on Cognitive Measures of Arrowsmith Program Students at Eaton Arrowsmith School and Eaton Learning Centre ====
prepared by Howard Eaton, Ed.M.

Documentation of significant score changes on a number of standardized psycho-educational assessments of students in the Arrowsmith Program at Arrowsmith School Toronto administered by the Eaton Learning Centre in Vancouver, and with students at Eaton Arrowsmith School in Vancouver.

Students demonstrated significant gains after time spent in the Arrowsmith Program on measures that are directly related to learning skills, cognitive functioning and academic outcomes such as: cognitive efficiency, working memory, visual motor integration, visual perceptual functioning, auditory processing for speech sounds, semantic knowledge, and achievement skills.<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.arrowsmithschool.org/arrowsmithprogram-background/pdf/academic-skills.pdf|title = Academic Skills and Learning Outcomes|date = |accessdate = |website = |publisher = |last = |first = }}</ref>

==== Treatment Outcome for a Motor Symbol Sequencing Dysfunction ====
Barbara A. Young, M.A. & Donald F. Burrill, Ph.D. Poster Session - 2000 APA Annual Convention, Washington D.C., August 7, 2000

This study investigated the relationship between a treatment program designed to train automatic written motor symbol sequences for a group of 12 learning disabled individuals having difficulty with the writing process and outcome measures on a test developed to measure the rate of learning a repeated sequence of symbols as an automatic motor pattern and standardized tests of writing and copying.

Significant positive changes were found from pre- to post-treatment testing on all measures.

The study concludes:

''“…for individuals identified as having certain specific difficulties with the writing process, the treatment program described in this paper improved subjects’ performance on tests of learning a symbol sequence, clerical speed and accuracy, handwriting, and copying''.<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.arrowsmithschool.org/arrowsmithprogram-background/research.html|title = Academic Skills and Learning Outcomes Brochure - Arrowsmith Program|date = |accessdate = |website = |publisher = |last = |first = }}</ref>”

Currently, Arrowsmith Program is engaged in research discussions at several universities across North America.<ref>http://www.arrowsmithschool.org/arrowsmithprogram-background/</ref>

In 2013, case study research was conducted to investigate how participation in the ] Association of Saskatchewan (LDAS)<ref>http://www.ldas.org/</ref> Arrowsmith Program affected the ], ], ], and interpersonal functioning of five students who attended this program for two to three years. ] involve consistent cognitive processing and academic difficulties that are present in individuals who have average or higher functioning in other cognitive processing areas. The average adult with a ] has less ], lower employment success, and higher rates of emotional and interpersonal difficulties.

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with five students and one or both of their parents. Standardized test results and information from the school cumulative folders of the students were also reviewed.

Four of the five students experienced large and significant increases in cognitive, academic, emotional, and/or interpersonal functioning following their participation in the LDAS Arrowsmith program. One of the five students had much smaller gains in cognitive and academic functioning and experienced difficulties with emotional and interpersonal functioning.<ref>http://ecommons.usask.ca/bitstream/handle/10388/ETD-2013-11-1268/KEMP-KOODISSERTATION.pdf?sequence=4</ref>

However according to doctor Linda Siegel, none of these studies, including the two published on Arrowsmith's website, provide any scientific evidence supporting the program's effectiveness.<ref>http://newsstore.fairfax.com.au/apps/viewDocument.ac;jsessionid=F0E32C8DE94AD4925945F61F5307E241?sy=afr&pb=all_ffx&dt=selectRange&dr=1month&so=relevance&sf=text&sf=headline&rc=10&rm=200&sp=brs&cls=18915&clsPage=1&docID=SMH121105DQ3MD3DFVRD</ref>


==Skepticism and criticism== ==Skepticism and criticism==

Revision as of 01:30, 4 June 2014

School in Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Arrowsmith School
Address
245 St. Clair Avenue West
Toronto, Ontario, M4V 1R3
Canada
Coordinates43°41′08″N 79°24′20″W / 43.6856°N 79.4056°W / 43.6856; -79.4056
Information
School typePrivate Co-educational Special education day school
Founded1980 (1980)
PrincipalBarbara Arrowsmith Young
LanguageEnglish
AffiliationNone
Websitewww.arrowsmithschool.org

The Arrowsmith School, also known as The Arrowsmith Program, is a school in Toronto that focuses on children with learning disabilities (also referred to as specific learning difficulties). Founded in 1980, the original Arrowsmith School is inToronto, Ontario and a second location was opened in May 2005 in Peterborough, Ontario. The school's philosophy and methods, called the Arrowsmith Program, have been incorporated in other public and private schools in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand.

Founded by Barbara Arrowsmith Young in 1978, the Arrowsmith Program helps students with learning disabilities by claims of using research in neuroplasticity, which suggests that the brain is dynamic and constantly rewiring itself. It is also founded on Ms. Arrowsmith Young’s personal experience of living with learning disabilities. In her late 20s, she had logical and verbal impairments that were so severe she couldn’t tell time by reading a clock – a struggle detailed in her recent book The Woman Who Changed Her Brain.

To help herself, Ms. Arrowsmith Young developed cognitive exercises that she claims help in stimulating the growth of neural pathways. She now has her students – who are not only children, but include adults into their 80s – follow a similar approach.

Barbara Arrowsmith Young

Barbara Arrowsmith Young is the Founder and Director of the Arrowsmith Program, and author of The Woman Who Changed Her Brain.

Diagnosed in grade one as having a mental block, which today would have been identified as multiple learning disabilities, she read and wrote everything backwards, had trouble processing concepts in language, continuously got lost and was physically uncoordinated. Barbara eventually learnt to read and write from left to right and claims to have mask a number of the symptoms of her learning disabilities through heroic effort; however she continued throughout her educational career to have difficulty with specific aspects of learning.

Barbara Arrowsmith Young holds both a B.A.Sc. in Child Studies from the University of Guelph, and a Master’s degree in School Psychology from the University of Toronto O.I.S.E. (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education).

In graduate school she came across two lines of research that intrigued her. Alexander Luria’s description of specific brain function lead her to a clearer understanding of her own learning problems and the work of Mark Rosenzweig suggested the possibility of improving brain function through specific stimulation, at least in animals. This lead to the creation of her first cognitive exercise designed to improve the learning capacity involved in logical reasoning. The results were positive with gains in verbal reasoning, mathematical reasoning and conceptual understanding. This lead to a further exploration of the nature of specific learning capacities and to creating exercises to strengthen them.

The Arrowsmith Program

Arrowsmith Program refers to the Arrowsmith Program methodology that is made available to students in public and private schools in Canada, the United States, Australia and New Zealand.

Founded by Barbara Arrowsmith Young in 1978, the Arrowsmith Program helps students with learning disabilities by using the research in neuroplasticity, which suggests that the brain is dynamic, and constantly rewiring itself. It is also founded on Ms. Arrowsmith Young’s personal experience in living with learning disabilities.

The Arrowsmith Program is founded on two lines of research, one of which established that different areas of the brain working together are responsible for complex mental activities, such as reading or writing, and that a weakness in one area can affect a number of different learning processes.

The other line of research investigated the principle of neuroplasticity, which is the ability of the brain to physically change in response to stimulus and activity, to develop new neuronal/synaptic interconnections and thereby develop and adapt new functions and roles believed to be the physical mechanism of learning. Neuroplasticity refers to structural and functional changes in the brain that are brought about by training and experience.

Skepticism and criticism

A lot of doubt and criticism has emerged, including from psychologists, neurologists and learning experts, on the credibility of the Arrowsmith program; especially given the lack of evidence of change in learning skills as well as the extremely high costs.

In 2003 the Vancouver School Board (VSB) received an 8 month Arrowsmith Program Evaluation Report from Linda Siegel, a Professor at the University of British Columbia in Educational and Counseling Psychology and Special Education. Two programs for elementary students with learning disabilities were to be compared over a three year period.

The Arrowsmith Program and an Extended Learning Assistance Class (ELAC) (which focused on reading and writing) were to be compared on measures of students’ cognitive ability and academic achievement. The Arrowsmith Program was to be piloted for three years (the average length of time it takes to complete the program) and the VSB received funding through the Vancouver Foundation.

After the first eight months of the pilot, tests of cognitive ability and academic achievement were given to all students involved in the study and an evaluation was written by Siegel (only achievement measures were reported). Siegel stated in her conclusion of her 8 month evaluation that, “On all but the comprehension and spelling measures, ELAC performed at higher levels than Arrowsmith, often by a relatively large amount.”  However, results from a review of Siegel’s data indicate her statements regarding the ELAC group are incorrect and do a disservice to those who could benefit from the Arrowsmith Program.

In his paper, Siegel’s Study: Points For Comment,  Howard Eaton argues that there are a variety of serious methodological, calculation, and statistical problems associated with the Siegel evaluation, and even with those problems there was no statistical support for the above conclusion. Analysis by two independent statisticians, one at the University of Toronto and one at the University of British Columbia, shows that the only statistically significant findings supported by the test scores presented in Siegel’s evaluation are that the Arrowsmith students showed greater gains in Comprehension and Spelling subtest measures as compared to the ELAC group. No subtests showed statistical significance in favor of the ELAC group.

The Arrowsmith Program was discontinued at the VSB and Siegel’s eight month evaluation was noted as being influential in this decision. Additionally, Eaton claims that Siegel’s study has been cited by Siegel herself, media and professionals involved in education as evidence against the effectiveness of the Arrowsmith Program. 

Professor Anne Castles is deputy director of the ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders at Macquarie University, Australia. Castles has stated in an article in the Learning Difficulties Australia Bulletin, an organization she is a council member of, that there is "a clear lack of independent research to support the program's claims", and no study has been published in a peer-reviewed journal on the Arrowsmith program.

According to the Department of Special Needs Education at the University of Oslo in Norway, research and studies reveal that 'brain training' programs do not show effectiveness in memory and other cognitive difficulties.

See also

References

  1. http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/about-dyslexia/schools-colleges-and-universities/what-are-specific-learning-difficulties.html
  2. "Schools That Offer the Arrowsmith Program". Arrowsmith School. Archived from the original on 25 July 2011. Retrieved 2011-09-01. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  3. http://www.barbaraarrowsmithyoung.com/book/
  4. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/science/brain/can-a-controversial-learning-program-transform-brains/article7871918/
  5. http://www.barbaraarrowsmithyoung.com/book/
  6. http://www.barbaraarrowsmithyoung.com/profile/
  7. http://www.arrowsmithschool.org/arrowsmithprogram/participating-schools.html
  8. http://ecps.educ.ubc.ca/person/linda-siegel/
  9. http://www.eatonarrowsmithschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Eaton-Review-of-Siegel-2003-Arrowsmith-Program-Evaluation.pdf
  10. http://www.ldaustralia.org/lda-council-2013-2014.html
  11. https://theconversation.com/brain-training-or-learning-as-we-like-to-call-it-9951
  12. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22612437

External links

Categories:
Arrowsmith School: Difference between revisions Add topic