| Revision as of 12:23, 22 August 2014 editZad68 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,355 edits You have been blocked from editing for violation of the three-revert rule. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:42, 22 August 2014 edit undoAnaphylaxis2014 (talk | contribs)49 edits →August 2014Next edit → | ||
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
| == August 2014 == | == August 2014 == | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ] and violating the ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. <code>]]</code> 12:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ] and violating the ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. <code>]]</code> 12:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> | ||
| {{unblock|reason=Apparently you believe it is acceptable to remove a "dubious" flag from a citation, even if (1) the citation is unrelated to the text it is referred from (2) the text itself is not a fact but a misrepresentation of science. So basically, this means that as long as there are more than 3 friends on Misplaced Pages that don't want to see a citation challenged, a single editor cannot mark a citation as "dubious" without risking a block. Well, I'm not sure that's what this encyclopedia's spirit was meant to be. ] (]) 12:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
Revision as of 12:42, 22 August 2014
|
if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the 
|
Hello! Anaphylaxis2014, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Misplaced Pages. Please join us! |
Welcome!
Hello, Anaphylaxis2014, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!
August 2014
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Materialization (paranormal), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrBill3 (talk) 10:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Speaking of non constructive edits, I think your message belongs to this category. Anaphylaxis2014 (talk) 10:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Materialization (paranormal). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn 11:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Well, you're the one not respecting discussions here by just removing the dubious tag before the situation is solved. Anaphylaxis2014 (talk) 11:29, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Anaphylaxis2014 reported by User:MrBill3 (Result: ). Thank you. MrBill3 (talk) 11:47, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
August 2014
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Zad68 12:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Anaphylaxis2014 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Apparently you believe it is acceptable to remove a "dubious" flag from a citation, even if (1) the citation is unrelated to the text it is referred from (2) the text itself is not a fact but a misrepresentation of science. So basically, this means that as long as there are more than 3 friends on Misplaced Pages that don't want to see a citation challenged, a single editor cannot mark a citation as "dubious" without risking a block. Well, I'm not sure that's what this encyclopedia's spirit was meant to be. Anaphylaxis2014 (talk) 12:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Apparently you believe it is acceptable to remove a "dubious" flag from a citation, even if (1) the citation is unrelated to the text it is referred from (2) the text itself is not a fact but a misrepresentation of science. So basically, this means that as long as there are more than 3 friends on Misplaced Pages that don't want to see a citation challenged, a single editor cannot mark a citation as "dubious" without risking a block. Well, I'm not sure that's what this encyclopedia's spirit was meant to be. ] (]) 12:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Apparently you believe it is acceptable to remove a "dubious" flag from a citation, even if (1) the citation is unrelated to the text it is referred from (2) the text itself is not a fact but a misrepresentation of science. So basically, this means that as long as there are more than 3 friends on Misplaced Pages that don't want to see a citation challenged, a single editor cannot mark a citation as "dubious" without risking a block. Well, I'm not sure that's what this encyclopedia's spirit was meant to be. ] (]) 12:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Apparently you believe it is acceptable to remove a "dubious" flag from a citation, even if (1) the citation is unrelated to the text it is referred from (2) the text itself is not a fact but a misrepresentation of science. So basically, this means that as long as there are more than 3 friends on Misplaced Pages that don't want to see a citation challenged, a single editor cannot mark a citation as "dubious" without risking a block. Well, I'm not sure that's what this encyclopedia's spirit was meant to be. ] (]) 12:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}