| Revision as of 18:17, 18 December 2014 editMoxy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors130,463 edits →Discussion and consensus ..attribution Misplaced Pages:Contributing to Misplaced Pages: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:36, 22 December 2014 edit undoRobert McClenon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers197,413 edits Warning: Personal attack directed at a specific editor on WP:ANI. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| {{quote|Every article on Misplaced Pages has a ], reached by clicking the <tt>Talk</tt> tab just above the title (for example, ]). There, editors can discuss improvements to the content of an article. You can participate too! If you ever make a change that gets ] by another editor, discuss the change on the talk page! The ] is a popular method of reaching consensus, and may be useful for identifying objections, keeping discussion moving forward and helping to break deadlocks. Some editors will see any reversion as a challenge, so be considerate and patient. While discussing matters, it is very important that you conduct yourself with ] and ] on the part of others. ] (repeatedly overriding or reimplementing contributions) is highly discouraged. There is a bright-line rule called the '']'', the violation of which may lead someone to be ] from editing to prevent further disruption. ] is not always intentional, as new editors may simply not understand ].}} -- ] (]) | {{quote|Every article on Misplaced Pages has a ], reached by clicking the <tt>Talk</tt> tab just above the title (for example, ]). There, editors can discuss improvements to the content of an article. You can participate too! If you ever make a change that gets ] by another editor, discuss the change on the talk page! The ] is a popular method of reaching consensus, and may be useful for identifying objections, keeping discussion moving forward and helping to break deadlocks. Some editors will see any reversion as a challenge, so be considerate and patient. While discussing matters, it is very important that you conduct yourself with ] and ] on the part of others. ] (repeatedly overriding or reimplementing contributions) is highly discouraged. There is a bright-line rule called the '']'', the violation of which may lead someone to be ] from editing to prevent further disruption. ] is not always intentional, as new editors may simply not understand ].}} -- ] (]) | ||
| == December 2014 == | |||
| ] Please ] other editors, as you did on ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. ''Do not accuse another editor of vandalism in a content dispute. The allegation of vandalism, in a content dispute, is a personal attack, and a strong one. If you have been editing Misplaced Pages long enough to know what vandalism is, you have been editing long enough to know what is not vandalism.''<!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> ] (]) 18:36, 22 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 18:36, 22 December 2014
Edit conflict at Metropolitan
You may wish to consider opening an account at Misplaced Pages for your recent edit for the advantages that an account offers to you. Your recent edits at Metropolitan appear to be disruptive and normal policy is for you to open Talk page discussion there and not force your edits into the article. FelixRosch (TALK) 20:27, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- IP Talk page has been posted for edit warring. IP has refused to start Talk discussion of any kind and continues to WP:EW. BRD applies at all times and you must make consensus before further edits. If you continue edit warring WP:EW and WP:3RR without responding to Talk of any kind you may be reported for being blocked and may be blocked without further notice. FelixRosch (TALK) 17:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Discussion and consensus ..attribution Misplaced Pages:Contributing to Misplaced Pages
Every article on Misplaced Pages has a talk page, reached by clicking the Talk tab just above the title (for example, Talk:Metropolitan (1990 film)). There, editors can discuss improvements to the content of an article. You can participate too! If you ever make a change that gets reverted by another editor, discuss the change on the talk page! The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle is a popular method of reaching consensus, and may be useful for identifying objections, keeping discussion moving forward and helping to break deadlocks. Some editors will see any reversion as a challenge, so be considerate and patient. While discussing matters, it is very important that you conduct yourself with civility and assume good faith on the part of others. Edit warring (repeatedly overriding or reimplementing contributions) is highly discouraged. There is a bright-line rule called the three-revert rule, the violation of which may lead someone to be blocked from editing to prevent further disruption. Disruptive editing is not always intentional, as new editors may simply not understand the ins and outs of Misplaced Pages.
December 2014
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on WP:ANI. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Do not accuse another editor of vandalism in a content dispute. The allegation of vandalism, in a content dispute, is a personal attack, and a strong one. If you have been editing Misplaced Pages long enough to know what vandalism is, you have been editing long enough to know what is not vandalism. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:36, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.