Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jerm: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:14, 29 December 2014 editJerm (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,667 edits →Question: r utterly pathetic← Previous edit Revision as of 05:49, 29 December 2014 edit undoJerm (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,667 edits archived manuallyNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
}} }}
{{busy|image=Busy_desk.svg}} {{busy|image=Busy_desk.svg}}
== ] ==

Thank you for engaging in the discussion with our Polish colleague - cos that's hopefully what we're here?

I started the proper topic at ]. I am ready to answer your questions and supply references to specialist literature if you have any doubts as to the diagram I assembled and uploaded to Wiki. The diagram itself includes only those links which might be of interest to people unfamiliar with the subject - traslations of some key tablets and data related to calculating new moon dates in the 7th and 6th centuries BC.

==December 2014==


] Hello JudeccaXIII. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (]), or content (]), moments after they are created{{#if:Bocassa|, as you did at ]}}. It's best to wait ''at least'' 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should ''not'' be marked as ]. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Misplaced Pages. Attack pages (]), blatant nonsense (]), copyright violations (]) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (]) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. I have no idea what possessed you to post a specious warning on my talk page, but if you can't even correctly figure out who created an article, you probably don't have the competency required to apply deletion tags.{{Z149}}<!-- Template:uw-hasty --> ] (]) 21:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

==''Merry Merry''==
To you and yours ] ] (]) 14:32, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
:Thnx, you have a happy Christmas as well:) — ] (]) 16:48, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

== Christmas and new year wishes ==

]




:::::May your Christmas be happy and your new year be blessed. ] (]) 19:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

== Merry Christmas ==

Thanks for your kind greetings a few days ago. My heartfelt wishes for a blessed, joyful, and festal Christmas season, with all the best for the coming year. ] (]) 22:06, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

==Yo Ho Ho==
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] ]

] (]) is wishing you ]! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's ] or ], ], ], ], ], ] or even the ], this is a special time of year for almost everyone! <br />

<small>Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{]:]}} to your friends' talk pages</small>.
{{clear}}
</div>

== Question == == Question ==


Revision as of 05:49, 29 December 2014

This is Jerm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Question

Hi there JudeccaXIII: Just a small question: What's with the mega Halloween and X-mas "messages" you've sent me?! Do you think that those holidays are important to me personally (outside of WP)? I am really trying hard to understand your motives. Please help me to understand what you are up to. Thanks in advance. Take care, IZAK (talk) 14:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

IZAK Its just a simple holiday cheer and nothing more. Expect more holiday cheers in the future from me, except for Valentines Day. Also if this makes you feel better, your not the only one who receives holiday cheers from me. But now that you messaged me, make sure you have a HAPPY NEW YEAR! Cheers!— JudeccaXIII (talk) 16:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
@JudeccaXIII: I see, in that case, since you seem to feel that anyone can be bombarded with messages about any old holidays that pop into your head creating a sort of "spamming" effect, may I kindly request that in my case you restrict yourself to sending messages about the Jewish holidays only when the mood hits you. Or maybe just stick to invisible "silent messages" that would take up a lot less room on my talk pages and reduce the need for and clutter of useless "communications". Take it easy, IZAK (talk) 03:09, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
IZAK It seems I offended you because the holiday cheers I sent you aren't Jewish holidays. Everyone sends holiday cheers because its the holidays, and you get wary about two template cheers, then start a discussion on my talk page about it. Out of all the discussions I'v seen or been involved in, this is the most absolute pathetic one. Also, I didn't start a Misplaced Pages account to spam talk pages, and you could have just asked respectfully to stop instead of accusing me of spamming over two holiday cheer templates. Here is my resolvement, Don't message me again and I won't message you again as well. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 05:14, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
User talk:Jerm: Difference between revisions Add topic