| Revision as of 10:34, 7 August 2006 editCrzrussian (talk | contribs)24,747 edits →Recall: a bit more← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:43, 7 August 2006 edit undoCrzrussian (talk | contribs)24,747 edits archiveNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| '''Archives of Old Comments:''' | '''Archives of Old Comments:''' | ||
| ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | ||
| == Re : prod-tip == | |||
| Moved, with the CAPS version now as redirect (required for me, as I hardcoded its path into monobook.js). You may also be interested in ] as well. - ''Cheers'', ] 15:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==My RfA== | |||
| <div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px blue; background-color: white;">]Thankyou for your participation in my RfA. Due to an almost even spread of votes between Oppose and Support (Final (16/13/6)) I have decided to withdraw for now and re-apply in a couple of months as suggested. I thank everyone for their kind support of my editorial skills; it meant a lot to me to get such strong recommendations from my fellow editors. If you ever have any hints as to how I can improve further, I would love to hear from you. ]] 15:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)</div> | |||
| == Thanks! == | |||
| Just a note of thanks for the barnstar. ] 18:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Leah Shakdiel== | |||
| She is notable for the court case and the Rabbinic opinions, not as a person. But the court case should be somewhere to refer to it from other pages. As you know I found myself doing this from Rabbi Waldenberg. {{unsigned|Jayrav}} | |||
| == Ann Coulter == | |||
| Good work on reverting the "anti-" categories. It's absolutely crazy to have them there. ] 19:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] put in an unblock request regarding your block over this dispute (and others), which I reviewed and denied. However, just as a bit of friendly advice, you might want to attempt a little more dialogue with editors whose changes you undo; Yas121 complained to me on IRC that you were unresponsive and didn't explain your actions. Also, if you're involved in a content dispute, it might be wise to get another admin to block others involved if necessary. --] 22:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: Is it really so crazy? She is on record calling Arabs 'Ragheads' and as saying we (USA) should just bomb the whole Middle-East. Now reverse the situation, suppose she had called Jews 'Kikes' and said we should just bomb Israel...how long do you think it would be before you, Crzrussian and other Jews here would rush to label her Anti-Semitic and include her in the Category:Anti-Semitic people ??!! ] 14:19, 4 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Speedy unspeedy delete keep == | |||
| D'ya mind if I trademark that? ^_^ ] 22:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Deletion of UserPage == | |||
| A bot called Drinibot operated by User: Drini has deleted my userpage could your please revert by page to when it had text and words on it, please, thanks. -- ] 03:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Deletion 2 == | |||
| I've reverted it myself, no need to worry now! :) -- ] 03:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Holla== | |||
| I'd not realized how great my loss of conditioning and strength was over the past seven months, so I'm a bit distressed; as a result, though, instead of spending more time at the gym, I'm spending less and instead editing here, which surely has some salutary benefit, even if it doesn't help with my ] (perhaps I'll just really let myself go, since I think the mouse on the left to be much cuter). ] | |||
| I am, though, so occupied with my work on several sports portals as to be unlikely to be able to undertake any admin work for a while; consequently, I don't yet think an RfA to be appropriate (although I'm surely appreciative of your efforts). There is an impulse at AfD—one that I find unfortunate—to oppose those who seem not to need the admin tools or who seem unlikely to use them, and I'd likely be opposed on those, if on no other, grounds (as ] suggests—at exorbitant length—where there it is wholly unlikely that a user will abuse the tools, they should be given, even if he'll only use them once weekly; there is no harm, and some benefit, to the project). | |||
| I understand removing ] from ] ] :) ], but you might do well to add her to ]. In any case, wherever I've happened upon you qua administrator, I've not yet found an instance where I think you to have acted other than correctly, so I should commend you for that (perhaps I should give myself the ''Nominated for adminship an editor who became a superb admin'' ]). Hope all is well... ] 06:02, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Request for advice == | |||
| Hello, I'm looking for advice from an editor more experienced than I am, and the decisions I've seen you make in AfDs have certainly been respectable, so I hope you don't mind me turning to you in this case. I'm currently involved in an edit dispute in the ] article with what I expect is one user, although the IP addresses have varied some. I won't go into the details of my position, which you can see on ], but I would like your advice on how best to reach a consensus/resolution. | |||
| I've explained my position in detail on that talk page, and I've left notes on the talk pages of all the user IPs involved, but none have responded either on my talk page or in the article's talk page--they just keep reverting back to their added text. (While the IP is dynamic, most have repeated at one point or another, so the user certainly would see the message on one of the talk pages.) Since the other user hasn't responded, I haven't yet gone to ], ], or other dispute resolution options. | |||
| In this case, would you advise me to: | |||
| # let it go, allow the text to remain in the article, and get on with my life; | |||
| # allow the text to remain, but add {{tl|POV}}, {{tl|Disputed}}, and/or any other relevant templates; | |||
| # continue reverting the POV text as I'm currently doing; | |||
| # pursue a dispute resolution option; | |||
| # some other course of action; | |||
| # bugger off and bother some other editor. | |||
| Any advice is appreciated. Thanks! -- ''']''' (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 06:48, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *Much obliged.... -- ''']''' (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 18:57, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == My RfA and your vote == | |||
| {| style="text-align:left; border: 1px solid darkgreen; background-color:honeydew;" | |||
| |- padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;" | |||
| |] | |||
| |style="font-size: 100%; align:center"|Hi Crazy Russian,<br>Thanks for participating in ]! Ultimately, no consensus was reached, but I still appreciate the fact that you showed up to add in your two cents. I plan on becoming much more involved with the articles themselves. You can feel free to talk to me about it or add some advice on ]. | |||
| <br>Sincerely, ] (]·]·]) | |||
| |- | |||
| |} | |||
| == Hate speech posted == | |||
| Hey CrazyR! Some anonymous user posted some hate speech about Israel on ] that is offensive. Are we allowed to delete hate speech? I didn’t want to remove it if deletion of talk was against Wiki rules. I found that garbage offensive. Could you look into it? Thanks. ] <small>]/]</small> 14:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Passage from Rebbes Army == | |||
| I just wanted to ask you why you found it neccessary to include the passage about Eric Yoffie and his daughter who attends Chabad. I don't know why, but it just seemed out of place to me. Is an article supposed to be compiled of random quotes that are found from any mention to the person in any book? Was there maybe some sort of controversy over the quote that it would need a place in the article? Maybe we should make another section called quotes and put in a couple of his quotes. I think that would make it more at place in the article. What do you think? <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small> | |||
| :Okay, my apologies. I now realize that would have been the right thing to do. Some stuff here is still new to me. Am I allowed to go back and delete it with a reason, or do you think I should just make a new section where it could be more in place? <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small> | |||
| == Hi Crary Russian, can't wait for class t start in gradual escuela == | |||
| Wanna be piled high and deep. Et tu? ] 20:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| They can't delete the ] so they are trying another tactic ! | |||
| Your vote is requested: | |||
| == Question == | |||
| I have an interesting question for you. I've seen you around on Misplaced Pages quite a bit, and respect your opinion. As such, I'd like to know what you think about the following diffs: , , and from the same FAC, and . I'm asking because you opposed ]'s RfA for issues that to me appear very similar to what I have been doing constantly to scores of FACs for over a year. Thus, my question is: if I were to stand for adminship today, after seeing this evidence and knowing that I fully stand behind these edits, would you support? I have no desire to continue as an admin if you or others who I respect feel that I should not hold the position. Thanks for your help. --]<sup>]</sup> <small><font color="brown">]</font></small> 07:12, 5 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hello, | |||
| An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: ]. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, ]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --] 19:23, 5 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == That is soo awsome! == | |||
| Where did you get that really cool edit count dial from, Pleeease tell me! :) -- ] 21:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Your Edit Count Log, At the top of your userpage it reads, CrazyRussian (Talk*Contrib*Blocks*Protects*Deletions*Moves*'''EditCount''') - Sysop #978 | |||
| :That edit count. --] 03:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::yep, that what I want, How do you add that to your userpage, like what you've done? --] 03:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Thanks sooo much!! Yaay!!! I've been looking for a way to easily tell my edit count, The only way I could do that until, well, now, Is by looking at it thorough your userpage. And again, Thanks! --] 03:39, 6 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Stressed== | |||
| LOL! I'm not stressed, I'm just been a busy bee lately. :P I also really liked the 4a thing on the Wikistress meter. I should change it before it becomes a really odd thing on my page. How's the...everything you do...going? ]] 05:49, 6 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :The part about me falling asleep right now, I'll be on <s>tommorow<s> later this morning. ]] 05:54, 6 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == UPage == | |||
| What's up with deleting it man? You all right? ] <sup>]</sup> 05:51, 6 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Sweet man. Privacy is a very valid concern. ] <sup>]</sup> 05:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == secret wall tattoos == | |||
| I know. I posted a copyright vio template on the users talk page and also mentioned in the secret tattoos talk page that it was also a copyright violation. ] 06:30, 6 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh! I didn't know that was a speedy deletion! Thanks, I've been copywrite tagging things all day wrong :(. ] 06:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Oh ok== | |||
| Oh, ok...but why doesn't your "discussion" page link with your "talk" page? I'm positive that others also did not notice, and mistook your nice page for being empty. ] 06:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned fair use image (Image:Romario.jpg)== | |||
| {| align="center" style="background-color: white; border:8px solid red; padding:5px; text-align: center; font-size: larger;" | |||
| |] | |||
| |This file may be '''deleted'''. | |||
| |} | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. | |||
| If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. ] 18:00, 6 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, deleted on G7. - <b>]</b><small> ]/]</small> 04:58, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello! == | |||
| Secret admin :-) --] 00:25, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Blocked for personal attack== | |||
| I have blocked you for one day based on this . Surely you know better. ] 04:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : I for one don't think your comment was meant as a personal attack. However, unblocking oneself should never be done. I suggest you re-block yourself and let us handle this on ]. It should be dealt with shortly. ] 04:44, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::If this is policy, point me to it, and I will reblock myself. If this is common sense, then I think I have enough credit with this community to stay unblocked foir a while. I won't do anything controversial, worry not. - <b>]</b><small> ]/]</small> 04:47, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::: It was a little bit of both (] says "Sysops are technically able to unblock themselves by following this procedure but should absolutely not do so") but it doesn't matter now it seems since FB seems to be dropping the matter. ] 04:51, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::See ]. I don't know what your above response is supposed to mean, but I would appreciate it if you allowed the situation to be resolved at the noticeboard. I don't think it was necesarily a person attack either, but when I supported your nomination for adminship I fully expected you to play by the same rules as the other sysops. ] 04:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::OK. If reblocked I will not re-unblock. I am fully accountable and 100% communicative. I'm going to get back to clearing out ] while y'all consider my fate on ANI. Cheers. - <b>]</b><small> ]/]</small> 04:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I can't find any reason for this block, please ANI and comment. --]] 05:43, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ANI == | |||
| Avi, chill, baby. I don't need an advocate. - <b>]</b><small> ]/]</small> 05:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I know you don't, but why miss out on all the bloody fun (read with english accent) ;) -- ] 05:28, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::mmmm chilled blood -- ] <small>]</small> 05:43, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::They don't have reliable electricity in the west bank as far as I know; I don't see how they could keep it adequately cooled. --]] 05:48, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Surreal == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Surreal Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I, mboverload, hereby award you the surreal barnstar for your completely tasteless but surreal comments. I had a surreal moment when I read them, even though I knew it was supposed to be a joke, so you get the surreal barnstar. Lets hope I don't have to give you another =D <big>DOUBLE TAKE</big> --]] 05:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| Feel free to remove this if you want, just wanted to give ya a smile =P --]] 05:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] and friends == | |||
| I think I'll leave that one to the more enthusiastic "Keep" voters. (In the AfD I noted that it wasn't "one of my more enthusiastic keeps." Consider those a different sort of "weasel words," as in "weaseling my way out of responsibility....") The ] essayist is on 24-hr timeout for ], and yet sadly I'm wasting it on minor housekeeping of that article. Perhaps this will herald a new period of stability for that article? Hmph, I'll take that idea with a <s>pint of blood</s> grain of salt... -- ''']''' (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 05:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :hehehehe.... - <b>]</b><small> ]/]</small> 05:42, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Recall == | == Recall == | ||
Revision as of 10:43, 7 August 2006
Archives of Old Comments:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
Recall
Okay, I'll bite. You're in Category:Administrators open to recall, so here's my honest assessment. I no longer have full confidence in your judgment as an administrator. Not only did you unblock yourself, a serious no-no, and grounds enough for desysopping in my opinion, as well as making the very ill-considered comment that led to it , you blocked an editor with which you were directly engaged in edit warring, , for what was clearly a content dispute, and which you so much as admit in your threat, saying future attempts to inject this POV will be met with a block, inadequately giving a block warning in an edit summary, of all places, inappropriately using rollback for content reverts and edit warring, and even edit warring in the first place. And I don't even know the bakground of why you were previously blocked for talk page spamming. As far as I'm concerned, your abuse of unblocking and blocking powers, and rollback, and demonstrating poor judgment in your comments and warnings, and certainly in even engaging in edit warring at all, all in just the last few days, are certainly enough for me to call your adminship into question. So, accordingly, I would ask that you resign your adminship until such time as the community can reconfirm its confidence in your judgment. Thank you. Dmcdevit·t 08:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I do emphatically dispute I was "edit warring" inasmuch as I was merely protecting the integrity of the articles from inappropriate injections of POV without a dog in the fight, which in my mind makes me impartial to the situation and therefore able to block to repeated instances. (I've taken the liberty to remove another user's inappropriate comment in my defense, and ask that no such irrelevant comment be posted by anyone in the future. I don't need an advocate. Feel free to opine at my second RfA if one is forthcoming.) - CrazyRussian talk/email 09:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- As for the talk page spamming, I was using AWB to deliver a note to the many members of Wikiproject:Judaism about Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism I had created. Cyde's immediate revocation of my block because he "didn't realize a sysop" is what actually gave me the idea that to unblock myself would have been appropriate. Ah, anyway, it was a mistake, as I've acknowledged multiple times on AN/I. - CrazyRussian talk/email 10:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)