Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 11:30, 21 August 2006

sockpuppet?

You know, for a new user, you are surprisingly deft with the rather confusing wikipedia interface. Are you somebody's sockpuppet? Sockpuppetry carries severe punishments on wikipedia. If you are , then I will find out.Netaji 10:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Now what is sockpuppet if I may ask?.User:Geek1975... I am a Ghost from Godhra

Click here Misplaced Pages:Sock puppet. Please keep facetious remarks out of wikipedia, thanks.Netaji 10:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Ha Ha Ha... very funny, no I am a new user who picks up things fast. And does not forget past easily.User:Geek1975

Very good. I suggest you watch your tone and not make borderline threats or personal attacks as those carry block penalties. Read the text below for the standard welcome.

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Netaji 11:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Hmmmm, mounting evidence of sockpuppetry from a new user who can browse the dark underbelly of wikipedia so quickly.Netaji 11:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Do we have a trophy for such an achievement at Wiki? U sort of administrator or just another cordial user? --Geek1975 11:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

A user, same as you. There are things for you to learn about how wikipedia works I think. I suggest you look at help pages for a while before beginning or you may get swamped. Misplaced Pages is not as pretty a place as it looks.Netaji 11:19, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

2002 Gujarat violence revision

Hi Geek1975 -- I see you've started to edit, which is very much appreciated. I want to just ask you to please tone down your edits on the talk page. Please see my proposal at Talk:2002 Gujarat violence#Proposal for informal mediation from Bcorr, and you can indicate your agreement to the proposal -- if you do agree with it. While I am not at all questioning your good faith, I just think it will help the process along.

Thank you again for your participation in this process. Sincerely, BCorr|Брайен 12:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi BCorr. If you have noticed my comments have been very civil. But some guys seem to act like big daddies around here, having their own vested pre-concieved notions, stalking the ones who do not adhere to their diktats, don't u think so? --Geek1975 12:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

One of the guidelines stated to refrain from characterizing the objectivity of others. Bakaman _Bakatalk 14:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Fascist in the real world equals Nazi. Don't play fool.Bakaman _Bakatalk 14:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Distortions and POV nonsense

Don't put truncated quotes and slanted distortions in the 2002 Gujarat violence/2006 revision article. I am watching you my friend.Netaji 08:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

If you persist with this kind of edit warring, I'll have to start vandalism warnings.Netaji 10:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Your last edits were unacceptable. The whole point of the revision was to report everything concisely. The Sreekumar attack was similar to attacks by other anti-Hindu elements, so no point in needlessly elaborating it. Plus, hrw is clearly an anti-Semitic cabal. Anti-Semitism creates a pattern of psycho-pathology that generates bias in favor of muslims. This bias leaks into their coverage of the Muslim-Hindu riots in India. Thus, their anti-semitism must be mentioned. Otherwise, I could start going to other muslim sites and quoting from neo-nazi websites that support and justify Islamic terrorism on the same grounds as yours (what does their 'anti-Semitism' have to do with coloring their views on Islamic terrorism?Everything, that's what).Netaji 10:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism of 2006 Gujarat violence/2006 revision

You have committed vandalism by putting in garbage that is not there in your cited article. This is your first warning. I will provide two more if you persist, then you will be reported.

Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Netaji 11:05, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

The article you cited DID not say that army participated in riots, only that they did not intervene. Your edit is unsources and POV and I have notified an admins to that effect and he agrees that they are wrong. If you persist then it WILL be vandalism.Netaji 11:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)