Misplaced Pages

talk:Userboxes/Language/Written: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Userboxes | Language Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:13, 3 September 2006 editTobias Conradi (talk | contribs)37,615 edits ipa-0← Previous edit Revision as of 14:54, 3 September 2006 edit undoCBDunkerson (talk | contribs)Administrators15,424 edits ipa-0: Yes, out of processNext edit →
Line 26: Line 26:


I think ipa-0 can in fact be usefull since it is used in en:WP, as en-0 is usefull for languages in en:WP. ] ] 14:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC) I think ipa-0 can in fact be usefull since it is used in en:WP, as en-0 is usefull for languages in en:WP. ] ] 14:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

:There ''was'' a TfD discussion about this and other 'level 0' templates, but the template itself was never tagged for deletion and thus the using it were likely unaware of the discussion. That ''is'' out of process so I have restored this template for now. --] 14:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:54, 3 September 2006

Request for new writing-system category: runes (ISO code runr)

Although I've previously discussed adding a userbox for runic literacy (in the Babelbox section), it seems more logical to list that skill under writing systems instead of languages. I see only a few problems with adding "runr-n" userboxes:

  1. No native level would apply, because almost nobody consistently uses runes (an ancient script) to write their native language.
  2. Some distinction between variants of the runic alphabet (Primitive Germanic vs. Saxon vs. Norse) might be useful. The ISO system, however, treats all runic scripts as a single block of Unicode: what kind of modifier should be added to "runr-n" to specify a variant alphabet?

--Ingeborg S. Nordén 00:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

ISO 15924 is Runr not runr. About variants you may ask User:Evertype who makes the codes. (nice to have him in WP). That currently nobody has Runr-N does not matter. I support the creation. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 01:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

User iso15924

instead of creating 100 userboces we could make Template:User iso15924 and then let people simply pass parameters. "{User iso15924|-ISO 15924-|-level-}" e.g. "{User iso15924|Cyrl|4}". Maybe an advanced template coder could do this. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 13:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

IMO the old boxes should than be only aliases. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 13:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

TfD and CfD

Level N and 5 are up for deletion Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_August_26#Category:Writing_systems_categories Tobias Conradi (Talk) 04:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

ipa-0

Can an admin state whether this was properly deleted, i.e. according to WP policies? was it marked for deletion? http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Template:User_ipa-0

I think ipa-0 can in fact be usefull since it is used in en:WP, as en-0 is usefull for languages in en:WP. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 14:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

There was a TfD discussion about this and other 'level 0' templates, but the template itself was never tagged for deletion and thus the ~50 people using it were likely unaware of the discussion. That is out of process so I have restored this template for now. --CBD 14:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages talk:Userboxes/Language/Written: Difference between revisions Add topic