Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:23, 16 October 2016

Wikihounding?

I do not know what you understand under wikihounding but reverting unhelpful edits is certainly not wikihounding. Try to accept criticism from others. The Banner talk 22:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

"Criticism"? Oh please. Going through a person's edit history, reverting edits which follow the MOS, and blindly calling them "unhelpful" is not criticism, it's harassment. —Wash whites separately (talk) 06:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

You have some mighty long toes. Get over it. The Banner talk 07:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

And often what you claim as "overlinking", leaves items with no links at all. Like René Redzepi, where you removed the only link to Denmark. The Banner talk 07:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

If you even bothered to read the WP:OVERLINKING page, you would know that major countries and nationalities are not linked unless they explain something important about the subject. Very seldom does the article for an entire country impart anything crucially relevant to the particular person. That was a hilarious attempt at a comeback up there, by the way. —Wash whites separately (talk) 08:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

You can tone down a bit. No personal attacks please. And as the WP:Overlinking claims: It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. You use it as a law written in stone instead of looking at it with common sense. (Yes, I have seen that you removed multiple instances of the United States in an article. I can agree with that. But just 1 link constitutes no overlinking.) The Banner talk 08:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

I never used personal attacks...? You're the one who told me to "get over it" when I called you out for stalking my edits and making unconstructive reverts. I am using common sense—if you want to know more about the individual, link to the city or town they are from, not the entire country. —Wash whites separately (talk) 08:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

You started about wikihounding and harrassing, remember. The Banner talk 16:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Accusing you of doing things you actually were doing is not a personal attack. When confronted with accusations of harassment, you told me to "get over it", so you knew fully well what you were doing, and now you're playing innocent. —Wash whites separately (talk) 11:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

LOL, nice try to blame me for your own behaviour. Unfortunately, I do not buy that. The Banner talk 17:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

My behaviour? What exactly did I do wrong? You stalked my edits and actively harassed me, I called you out on it, you told me to "get over it", then you tried playing innocent, and now you're pretending to be the victim. Ahahahaha. —Wash whites separately (talk) 18:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

I take offence of your highly aggressive behaviour and personal attacks. This is not the way to engage in meaningful discussion or cooperation. The Banner talk 21:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

My behavior isn't even remotely aggressive, and I haven't made a single personal attack against you. Again, you are trying to lie and play the victim because you know fully well that you engaged in harassment; I see right through your tactics. If you really cared about meaningful cooperation, then you wouldn't have harassed me in the first place. —Wash whites separately (talk) 00:57, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

And more personal attacks... The Banner talk 08:49, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

And more lying... —Wash whites separately (talk) 14:14, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Look at your own behaviour and please revert the nonsense on Margaret Sanger. It would have been nice when you had looked into the history of the section "Race" to see how often that part was already removed. In effect, a bit further in that section you can read the contrary to what you have restored: Sanger did not tolerate bigotry among her staff, nor would she tolerate any refusal to work within interracial projects. Sanger's work with minorities earned praise from Martin Luther King, Jr., in his 1966 acceptance speech for the Margaret Sanger award. The Banner talk 15:08, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Try to be honest this time and realize that the statements about Aboriginals are her own published words. How is that "nonsense"? —Wash whites separately (talk) 15:21, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Try to read the sources... The Banner talk 15:29, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

I did. Take your own advice... —Wash whites separately (talk) 15:32, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

LOL, if you had really done that you would have seen that Sanger was citing others and that it was only a passing mention. The Banner talk 15:51, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

LOL, those are still her own published words. —Wash whites separately (talk) 15:54, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

We are well past the point where either of you is likely to say, "Sorry. My mistake. You were right." or "How can we work this out?" I suppose you just aren't done talking at each other yet. - SummerPhD 16:34, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

He has been actively harassing and attacking me for quite some time now (offenses for which he has already been blocked twice). I am only defending myself. —Wash whites separately (talk) 17:25, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

If either of you feel the other is being disruptive, you are clearly wasting your time discussing it here. - SummerPhD 17:56, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

I am thinking about bringing him to AN/I as I am sick of his personal attacks and false accusations. The Banner talk 19:41, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

The only false accusations here are your constant lies about me making personal attacks. And now you've just made a threat against me. Go ahead and do it. The proof will show that you are in the wrong. :) —Wash whites separately (talk) 20:23, 16 October 2016 (UTC)