Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ktrimi991: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:43, 14 February 2017 editResnjari (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users27,468 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 04:59, 14 February 2017 edit undoResnjari (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users27,468 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 66: Line 66:
::::::: Your new campaign which is aimed to add hypothesis about Serbs helping Ottomans in their conquest of Europe based on Anzulovic's work does not support your claims that its not about the ethnicity. I hope I am wrong. All the best.--] (]) 23:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC) ::::::: Your new campaign which is aimed to add hypothesis about Serbs helping Ottomans in their conquest of Europe based on Anzulovic's work does not support your claims that its not about the ethnicity. I hope I am wrong. All the best.--] (]) 23:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
::::::::You wrote {{tq|I will include Babinger...}} after I explained to you that you used a controversial source in the field which was not the main specialty of its author to add the hypothesis already refuted by scholars who are experts in the field in question. Instead, you continued to edit war with other editors to reinsert refuted hypothesis, ie with this . Your editing is clear and deliberate violation of wikipedia rules. All the best.--] (]) 22:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC) ::::::::You wrote {{tq|I will include Babinger...}} after I explained to you that you used a controversial source in the field which was not the main specialty of its author to add the hypothesis already refuted by scholars who are experts in the field in question. Instead, you continued to edit war with other editors to reinsert refuted hypothesis, ie with this . Your editing is clear and deliberate violation of wikipedia rules. All the best.--] (]) 22:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
::::::::::Antidiskriminator, ] until at least the end of the Milosevic period was compiled by historians from the nationalist/patriotic group. In general one must exercise caution. As you ] have at times reminded Albanian editors about being cautious with the use of Albanian historiography dating from the communist period. In the end its all about due diligence.] (]) 04:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

==Orlov revolt==
] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. Your edits appear to be ] and have been ]. ] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. Your edits appear to be ] and have been ].
* If you are engaged in an article ] with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek ] with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's ] page, and ask for independent help at one of the ]. * If you are engaged in an article ] with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek ] with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's ] page, and ask for independent help at one of the ].

Revision as of 04:59, 14 February 2017

Welcome!

Hello, Ktrimi991, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Misplaced Pages Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Misplaced Pages. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 27 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Kosovo 2015 games

Thanks for this correction. I totally discarded the year 2015 and assumed the event to somehow be in the future still. --OJ (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your edit OJ! No one had noticed article needed update expect of you. I try to edit as much as I can during my limited free time and because of this sometimes I make mistakes. That is why Misplaced Pages needs as many editors as possible, to help and assist each other. Best regards! Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Old City Hammam (Mitrovica), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mitrovica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. t's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ktrimi991. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)



Invitation

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits or that you are in some way connected to Albania or Albanians related articles.

We are a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Albania and Albanians related topics and are organized within WikiProject Albania.
I thought that you may be interested in viewing the current tasks of our WikiProject or its talk page and get involved. Furthermore, if you are interested in joining the wikiproject, please feel free to add your name in the Participants' page!.

Thank you and, again, welcome among us!

--Antidiskriminator (talk) 23:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring at Banja, Skenderaj

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Anzulović

Hello,

I noticed you are on campaign of addition text sourced by work which is criticized as "ideological pamphlet" of "little scholarly value" (link). I propose you to be much more careful with addition of it, especially when it comes to the field which was not the main speciality of Anzulovic, like medieval history. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 23:16, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi Antidiskriminator, Noel Malcolm and his books on Bosnia and Kosovo and have been also critised. Batakovic too. Ktrimi991 (talk) 23:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Many books published in Yugoslavia and Serbia which you use everyday. Ktrimi991 (talk) 23:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict)

Mehmed the Conqueror and His Time By Franz Babinger page 40, says:
“It was formerly belived that George Branković, responding to Murad's hopes in him, had blocked the mountain passes against George Castriota, who supposedly tried to come to the crusaders help with his Albanian troops. But recent research has shown this to be untrue.” Babinger was specialized in Medieval history, while Anzulovic was specialized in something else.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 23:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
. Ktrimi991 (talk) 23:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
(edit conflict) To reply to your comment about books published in Serbia and Yugoslavia. This is not the first time you imply that works authored by Serbs are not reliable. I explained you more than once to go to RSN and prove your POV or stop pushing it around. This kind of ethnicity based arguments are not constructive at least. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 23:26, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
It is not about ethnicity and this was explained to you by multiple editors. Your refusal to take the point is not constructive. I will include Babinger because of WP:Undue. Ktrimi991 (talk) 23:30, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Your new campaign which is aimed to add hypothesis about Serbs helping Ottomans in their conquest of Europe based on Anzulovic's work does not support your claims that its not about the ethnicity. I hope I am wrong. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 23:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
You wrote I will include Babinger... after I explained to you that you used a controversial source in the field which was not the main specialty of its author to add the hypothesis already refuted by scholars who are experts in the field in question. Instead, you continued to edit war with other editors to reinsert refuted hypothesis, ie with this diff. Your editing is clear and deliberate violation of wikipedia rules. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Antidiskriminator, Serbian historiography until at least the end of the Milosevic period was compiled by historians from the nationalist/patriotic group. In general one must exercise caution. As you ] have at times reminded Albanian editors about being cautious with the use of Albanian historiography dating from the communist period. In the end its all about due diligence.Resnjari (talk) 04:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Orlov revolt

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Orlov revolt. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Alexikoua (talk) 22:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Edit at the Orlov article was ok if the Kosmas stuff remained. As Kosmas' death however is deemed outside the events that transpired so in the end no need for the link.Resnjari (talk) 04:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Epic Barnstar
For your perseverance and resolve in making many excellent and much needed contributions. Keep the good work up ! Resnjari (talk) 04:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Category:
User talk:Ktrimi991: Difference between revisions Add topic