Misplaced Pages

Talk:2017 Turku attack: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:51, 18 August 2017 editRævhuld (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,591 edits Created page with '{{British English}}'Tag: 2017 wikitext editor  Revision as of 14:53, 18 August 2017 edit undoRævhuld (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,591 edits No cites in the summary: new sectionTag: 2017 wikitext editorNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{British English}} {{British English}}

== No cites in the summary ==

Hey guys, please don't put cites in the summary. Some articles have them, but it is Misplaced Pages standard for good articles to not have cites in the summary. Just write in the article with cites and summarize if important in the summary. KR--] (]) 14:53, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:53, 18 August 2017

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

No cites in the summary

Hey guys, please don't put cites in the summary. Some articles have them, but it is Misplaced Pages standard for good articles to not have cites in the summary. Just write in the article with cites and summarize if important in the summary. KR--Rævhuld (talk) 14:53, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:
Talk:2017 Turku attack: Difference between revisions Add topic