Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 01:09, 26 May 2018

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

User:Vaalpak reported by User:Kirbanzo (Result: Semi)

Page

Joseph diGenova (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Vaalpak (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 20:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "the sources do not identify this as something he is prominent for"
2. 20:19, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "did not remove any content from article"
3. 20:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "moved text from lead - controversial sentence like this should not be the second sentence in the article. also only 2 or 3 news outlets label digenova this way"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 20:19, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "Caution: Removal of content, blanking on Joseph diGenova. (TW)"
2. 20:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Vandalism on Joseph diGenova. (TW)"
3. 20:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Peter Strzok. (TW)"
4. 20:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Joseph diGenova. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

• I think this user might be Neilen who has previously been banned for sockpuppetry. Neilen made almost the identical edit to the Peter Strzok article before he was blocked. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 20:30, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
• I did not go for dispute resolution due to evidence this account is vandalism only. Kirbanzo (talk) 20:31, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

• Result: Page semiprotected two months. This is intended to discourage drive-by editing by new editors who aren't willing to discuss their changes on Talk. I've also left a notice on the talk page that the subject matter falls under WP:ARBAP2. I am not applying a page restriction such as 1RR. Normal editing can continue, but only by autoconfirmed editors. This keeps the option of WP:ECP available for the future if the semiprotection doesn't improve the editing climate. The SPI report on Vaalpak was closed with no action. EdJohnston (talk) 17:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

User:AldezD reported by User:Tigranis (Result: Protected)

Page: Pointless (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: AldezD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

• User:AldezD has repeatedly reverted the page when at least 3 editors have disagreed with him but began a discussion when challenged to do so in an edit summary. He was warned at the outset that he had reverted too many times already (on 21st May) but then reverted 3 times in the space of 24 hours 21-22 May.--Tigranis (talk) 04:34, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
  • The first three edits linked above are from 6, 10 and 12 days ago. The other three edits on 21 May do not fail WP:3RR since there wasn't a fourth revert. My edits on 21 May reverted re-addition of unsourced content that fails WP:V and falls under WP:NOTTVGUIDE. After reverting yesterday I initiated a discussion on the talk page linking to guidelines that explain why this content is not appropriate. Even when presented with guidelines, comments from editors including @User:Tigranis are simply "I don't agree" rather than addressing those guidelines, or repeatedly asking "what are the guidelines" even when they are linked within the discussion. I then asked for WP:3O, with the responder agreeing with me that this content does not belong on Misplaced Pages. AldezD (talk) 12:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Page protected – 3 days by User:Fish and Karate per a request at WP:RFPP. EdJohnston (talk) 03:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

User:TDN92 reported by User:Mztourist (Result: Defer to the SPI)

Page: Viet Cong attack on Tan Son Nhut Air Base (1966) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: TDN92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

User:TDN:92 and IP:117.6.92.136 (possibly an IP sock) have been edit-warring the results of this and various other First Indochina War and Vietnam War battles. I referred this to discussion of the Talk page which has been fruitless. Mztourist (talk) 05:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

See also WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Dino nam. I am almost at the point of indeffing TDN92 as a sock of Dino nam based on behavior, but now that there is an SPI, let's see what happens there. EdJohnston (talk) 17:15, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

• Result: Deferring to the SPI. If this editor continues to revert and the SPI isn't resolved, post on my talk page and maybe something can be done. EdJohnston (talk) 01:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

User:2001:8003:4023:D900:45A4:C69C:3094:F649 reported by User:Liftarn (Result: Semi)

Page: List of grenade attacks in Sweden (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 2001:8003:4023:d900:45a4:c69c:3094:f649 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

• Result: Semiprotected two weeks. Edit warring by a fluctuating IP. EdJohnston (talk) 03:45, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

User:Bbt400 reported by 109.144.211.250 (Result: Semi)

User being reported: Bbt400 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Page: Template:2018–19 EFL League One table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User:Bbt400 Edit warring on 2018-19 EFL League One. 109.144.211.250 (talk) 15:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:2018%E2%80%9319_EFL_League_One_table&diff=prev&oldid=842613005

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:2018%E2%80%9319_EFL_League_One_table&diff=prev&oldid=842613000

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:2018%E2%80%9319_EFL_League_One_table&diff=prev&oldid=842612929

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:2018%E2%80%9319_EFL_League_One_table&diff=prev&oldid=842612863 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.144.211.250 (talk) 15:14, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

• Result: Semiprotected for 2 weeks. EdJohnston (talk) 04:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

User:62.7.176.20 reported by User:BangJan1999 (Result:Blocked 72 hours )

Page

Template:2018–19 EFL League One table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

62.7.176.20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Comments:

• Blocked – for a period of 72 hours. User is clearly on a rampage and is rapidly reverting several users across a wide swath of Misplaced Pages without cause or explanation. --Jayron32 15:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

User:86.153.135.111 reported by User:ZH8000 (Result: Semi)

Page

Vignette (road tax) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

86.153.135.111 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. Consecutive edits made from 16:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC) to 17:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
   1. 16:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Switzerland */"
   2. 17:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Switzerland */ Restore valid and correct sentence entirely supported by the alternate reference, but CE for passive voice and explain why."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 12:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Welcome to Misplaced Pages! (TW)"
2. 17:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Schaffhausen. (TW)"
3. 17:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* May 2018 */"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 02:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "/* POV */ new section"
2. 02:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "/* POV */"
3. 02:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "/* POV */"
4. 13:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */ Unbelievable"
5. 13:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */"
6. 16:51, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */ LOL"
7. 16:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */"

Comments:

There is an ongoing discussion taking place. And there is no justification to re-add the disputed text. ZH8000 (talk) 18:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

• Result: Page already semiprotected per another report. EdJohnston (talk) 04:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

User:78.0.246.100 reported by User:ZH8000 (Result: Semi)

Page

Vignette (road tax) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

78.0.246.100 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 00:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC) "I've restored the text along with the price hike footnote, and a bit more strained but unambiguous explanation, as ZH8000 continues to refuse to provide any reason for why he/she thinks this is OR"
2. Consecutive edits made from 16:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC) to 17:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
   1. 16:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Switzerland */"
   2. 17:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Switzerland */ Restore valid and correct sentence entirely supported by the alternate reference, but CE for passive voice and explain why."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 12:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Welcome to Misplaced Pages! (TW)"
2. 17:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Schaffhausen. (TW)"
3. 17:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* May 2018 */"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 13:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */ Unbelievable"
2. 13:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */"
3. 16:51, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */ LOL"
4. 16:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */"
5. 23:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */"
6. 23:11, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */"

Comments:

Violates 3RR by using several IP sockets: 78.0.246.100, 86.153.135.111, 93.142.87.187, 93.139.89.201, 190.213.15.141, 93.136.77.51 despite unresolved dispute. ZH8000 (talk) 00:44, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm not 86.153.135.111 nor 190.213.15.141 (I don't know who that is), the others are because my IP is dynamic. ZH8000 is the one who has done the most reverting and keeps calling me and 86.153.135.111 names (see talk page) and reporting to this noticeboard to get his way. See . He/she is also trying to get the talk page protected to shut down the discussion . 78.0.246.100 (talk) 01:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

• Result: Page semiprotected one month. The IP-hopper introduced their claim on 20 May that Switzerland's vignette is the 'most expensive in Europe for transiting passenger car drivers' and is warring to maintain it in the article even though no one else supports it. The claim can't be found in the source article and appears to be WP:OR. Consider the steps of WP:DR. A person who reverts from a fluctuating IP may run afoul of the WP:SOCK policy. EdJohnston (talk) 02:45, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

User:Dennis Brown reported by User:Zefr (Result: No violation)

Page: Carolina Reaper (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Dennis Brown (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: link here

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: user's Talk page

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:
I've notified Dennis Brown since Zefr failed to make the mandatory notification. Meters (talk) 01:45, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

It was done properly. See his Talk page history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zefr (talk • contribs) 01:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

That's just an edit warring warning, not the mandatory notice that an AN3 report had been opened. Meters (talk) 02:10, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

• No violation Dennis Brown is at 3RR, but has not violated it. Same applies to the complainant in this thread, it should be noted. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 01:57, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
• I didn't hit 4RR, and I made it clear I wouldn't be reverting anymore today. Zefr is the problem here. First he reverts saying it is original research, yet CNN is the source. That failed, so next he's saying it has to have a MEDRS source (it doesn't, it isn't a medical article or claim, it is an event) His next reverts are linking to irrelevant policies. Not once has he explained why he thinks they apply, and uses only the edit summary and templating my page as communication. Three editors have decided the material is worth keeping, and he keeps shaking the magic 8 ball with a new reason in the summary, but no discussion until he was finally goaded to. I've used the talk page for every revert, I've compromised with the editors who agree on the content to make it better suited, I was happy to hear WHY he thought policy was against it but he refused to say why, just throwing links around, links that I don't think he fully understands the meaning of. The only editor that is just blind reverting without discussion and against 3 editors who agree on the content is Zefr. It isn't about the count of reverts, it's about the behavior around them. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 02:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

• Despite Zefr's claim that Dennis Brown violated 3RR this is not correct. Brown undid this three times today, discussed it on the talk page, and stated that he was done with his reverts , all before this 3RR was opened. As far as I can tell Brown has not made this edit previously. Zefr restored his or her preferred version three times today , and had previously made the same or substantially similar removals . I think we are into WP:BOOMERANG territory. Meters (talk) 02:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Seems to be WP:OWN behavior on Zefr's part just from reading Dennis' message above. Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

I would request that the behavior be examined more closely, understanding that mine will be as well. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 02:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

The edits/purposed edits are very clearly in the MEDRS territory note for example that this is taking a case report as being established fact and even the current wording is taking a very tenuous connection as being a well determined causation. There shouldn't be any debate that this should both fall under MEDRS and that it doesn't at all meet that established standard. Falconjh (talk) 03:46, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Irrelevant and misleading. This is a discussion of edit warring, not article content. That edit was 6 weeks ago and Dennis Brown did not make it and has not restored it. I agree that that version is very likely a MEDRS violation, but MEDRS is not one of the exemptions from edit warring per WP:NOT3RR, I'll add a comment to my previous listing of that edit by Zefr for consideration of any possible boomerang.. Meters (talk) 04:38, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

• The complaint has been closed (above) by User:78.26 as No violation. There is nothing more for AN3 to do. I'm sure that the experienced people here can think of some places that a consensus could be worked out. EdJohnston (talk) 04:59, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

User:Mr KEBAB reported by User:Softlavender (Result: No action)

Page: Richard Wagner (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Mr KEBAB (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

• Just read my edit summaries, which the OP has refused to do. (S)he also required me to provide a citation when the transcription was unsourced to begin with. Mr KEBAB (talk) 16:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
  • I did no such thing. Provide diffs of your claims. Softlavender (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
    • , , Mr KEBAB (talk) 16:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
      • The first diff is not me; the second and third diffs prove your claim is false. Softlavender (talk) 16:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
        • Fair enough, but that doesn't change much. It still means you didn't read my edit summaries. Mr KEBAB (talk) 16:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
          • Provide diffs or other proof to substantiate that ad hominem claim. Softlavender (talk) 16:33, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
            • I think I'll quit this pointless discussion. Mr KEBAB (talk) 16:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
• For what it's worth, when the comment <!-- Do not change this without a source --> was added to the article, the vowel was already Template:IPA-de. It appears it was changed to Template:IPA-de by an IP, probably inadvertently, as their summary explains other changes in the edit but not the one to the first vowel. So I doubt those who reverted Mr KEBAB had any grounding, but Mr KEBAB also could have certainly handled it in a more respectful manner. Nardog (talk) 16:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
• I must also note that the fourth diff provided by the reporter is not a revert, just a removal of a comment telling people not to edit something already unsourced without providing a source. This strikes me as an WP:OWNERSHIP issue on the part of the two who reverted Mr KEBAB's edit. They reverted it simply because it was a change to something that stood in a featured article for very long, without examining the validity of his edit, which they could have done by simply clicking the notation and reading Help:IPA/Standard German. But Mr KEBAB also could have and should have spared passive-agressive or uncivil comments in summaries on his talk and continued trying to get his point across, such as quoting or pointing to the relevant part of the help page, initiating a conversation on the talk, or citing an external source like Duden. Nardog (talk) 17:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Please read WP:3RR. "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert." (underscoring mine) Softlavender (talk) 17:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
    • Well, if it weren't him someone should have removed such a silly comment a long time ago, if you ask me. Nardog (talk) 17:10, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
      • He was warned about 3RR but made a fourth revert anyway. That's a 3RR violation. Softlavender (talk) 17:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
        • I didn't revert anyone but removed an inappropriate hidden message. Mr KEBAB (talk) 17:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
          • Please read WP:3RR. "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert." (underscoring mine) Softlavender (talk) 17:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Has Nardog's edit resolved the dispute? --NeilN 18:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

• Result: No action. This war may have stopped. Report again if it continues. EdJohnston (talk) 01:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

User:Altamimi579 reported by User:wikaviani (Result: Blocked)

Page: Al-Awamiyah (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Altamimi579 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1.  : first straight revert
2.  : second straight revert
3.  : third straight revert
4.  : fourth straight revert

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:
Please note that Altamimi579 has made more disruptive edits : , and . This last edit reverted my attempt to bring back the stable version and occured after many attempts to discuss with the reported user : , , , and . The user Altamimi579 firmly declined any attempt to gain consensus : . I would welcome the eye of an admin regarding this user's behavior. Best regards.Wikaviani (talk) 17:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Blocked – 31 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 15:39, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

User:WilliamJE reported by User:BrownHairedGirl (Result: Blocked)

Page

Category:Rayne Red Sox players (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

WilliamJE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 00:07, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "I've replied to you. You don't know baseball or the wikiproject baseball. Go to WikiProject Baseball's talk page."
2. 00:02, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "See my reply at CFD."
3. 23:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC) "Isn't the same team. Not the way minor league baseball players are sorted either. See Category:Syracuse Chiefs players and Category:Syracuse SkyChiefs players"
4. 12:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC) "Not a category for this page."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

4 reverts ~12 hours. User warned in edit summary here and in discussion here. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:48, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

I replied to BHG here multiple times. She hasn't even tried to rebutt me or taken it to WikiProject Baseball as I told her. She comes here instead. That says alot....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

William, I tried to have a discussion with you per WP:BRD. You kept on reverting, so naturally I came here to get you to stop. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:58, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

You haven't responded once to my rebuttal or gone to WikiProject baseball. Again you come here to bully. What does that say about you. Your edit summaries here and here use the word silliness. What does that unnecessary word saw about you? I can point out another instance of you trying to bully or mock me. So when are you going to WikiProject Baseball's talk page?...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:08, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

William, I replied to you twice, but you kept on reverting. That silliness is why you are here. Which part of WP:3RR is unclear to you? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:41, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

• Blocked – 31 hours by User:Longhair. EdJohnston (talk) 02:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

User:Aligulla reported by User:Krimuk2.0 (Result: Blocked)

Page

Alia Bhatt (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Aligulla (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 11:17, 25 May 2018 (UTC) ""
2. 11:05, 25 May 2018 (UTC) ""
3. 10:39, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "she is not british actress however she got british nationality.if she is proud of to be british not indian then she has to work in british movies."
4. 22:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC) ""
5. 22:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 10:48, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Alia Bhatt. (TW)"
2. 11:08, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "/* May 2018 */ re"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Repeatedly changing the actress' nationality despite reference in article (which I also posted on their talk page), in which the actress and her father claim otherwise. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Blocked – 48 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 01:06, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

User:Nilkpo reported by User:Saqib (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

Page

Mary Gill (politician) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Nilkpo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 17:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Political career */"
2. 17:33, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Political career */"
3. 17:30, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Political career */"
4. 17:22, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Political career */"
5. 16:22, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Political career */"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 17:25, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Caution: Not adhering to neutral point of view on Mary Gill (politician). (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Clearly engaging in edit warring and writing BLPs like a news story. see the user talk page for warnings. Saqib (talk) 17:36, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

I blocked Nilkpo for 24 hours. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:01, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

User:108.206.145.38 reported by User:Geraldo Perez (Result: )

Page

Template:Demi Lovato (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

108.206.145.38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 22:10, 25 May 2018 (UTC) ""
2. Consecutive edits made from 14:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC) to 14:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
   1. 14:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC) ""
   2. 14:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC) ""
3. 02:55, 25 May 2018 (UTC) ""
4. Consecutive edits made from 22:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC) to 22:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
   1. 22:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC) ""
   2. 22:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 22:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Template:Demi Lovato. (TW)"
2. 03:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "more on reasons"
3. 19:07, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Template:Demi Lovato. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

User:Harvardgrad8897 reported by User:Meters (Result: )

Page

Template:Gail Lese (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Harvardgrad8897 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 00:30, 26 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842956611 by Meters (talk) this is a factual news item with a verified third party noting Gail else’s arrrst."
2. 20:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842955090 by Meters (talk) no violation. Gail lese is a public figure. Her arrest of assault with a dangerous weapon and possession of a dangerous weapon were reported in the daily item and it has been properly sourced."
3. 20:45, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842955090 by Meters (talk)"
4. 20:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842945205 by Chevoitkate247 ( ]) this is from a credible newspaper “the daily item” which is part of the Essex media group publications. Gail leases arrest was published in the police log section of this daily newspaper. Gail lese is a public figure (ran for state senate) so the argument of BLPCRIME is not relevant. Users should be able to add relevant third party sourced data about a public figure."
5. 18:48, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842501290 by Chevoitkate247 (talk) Gail Lese is a public figure that ran for state senate. this is referenced in the article. she is also a published MD and American CEO. the arrest reference is attributed to a credible third party media outlet."|warnings=# 20:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Gail Lese.

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

20:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Gail Lese.

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 21:29, May 22, 2018‎ (UTC) on Talk:Gail Lese "Removed personal life, violates WP:BLPCRIME

Comments:

Restoring BLP violating criminal material. Subject made one unsuccessful run for public office so is unlikely to be a public figure, thus this violates WP:BLPCRIME. Even if the subject is considered well-known, the one source does not pass WP:WELLKNOWN. The editor has made no attempt to respond to the article talk page or user talk page posts. Meters (talk) 00:52, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring
• Misplaced Pages:Edit warring