| Revision as of 14:24, 1 November 2006 editWissahickon Creek (talk | contribs)223 edits →Category:Single-party system parties: rename← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:12, 1 November 2006 edit undoAnemoneProjectors (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators176,340 edits →Category:Fictional preteens: deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| {{lc|Fictional preteens}}<br/> | {{lc|Fictional preteens}}<br/> | ||
| Basically, fictional characters by age is supposed to be a way of categorizing fictional characters by how long they've lived. ] includes any character over 100 years. It would be feasible to create ] as a subcategory (but it would also be pointless). "Fictional preteens" categorizes characters by their inclusion to a small age group, roughly 11-12. It even described "too old to be considered children", when I would describe preteens ''AS'' children. Many characters grow up on television, and pass through preteen phases which makes them warrant inclusion. In fact, any character that's lived to be a preteen should be included. This category baffles me. ~<b><font color="purple">]</font></b><sup>]</sup> 13:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | Basically, fictional characters by age is supposed to be a way of categorizing fictional characters by how long they've lived. ] includes any character over 100 years. It would be feasible to create ] as a subcategory (but it would also be pointless). "Fictional preteens" categorizes characters by their inclusion to a small age group, roughly 11-12. It even described "too old to be considered children", when I would describe preteens ''AS'' children. Many characters grow up on television, and pass through preteen phases which makes them warrant inclusion. In fact, any character that's lived to be a preteen should be included. This category baffles me. ~<b><font color="purple">]</font></b><sup>]</sup> 13:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Categories for fictional children, teenagers and adults were deleted, and this should be deleted for the same reasons. — ]''<font color="green">]</font>''] <small>(])</small> 15:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==== Category:Pikmin characters ==== | ==== Category:Pikmin characters ==== | ||
Revision as of 15:12, 1 November 2006
| < October 31 | November 2 > |
|---|
November 1
NEW NOMINATIONS
Category:Elizabeth Moon
Category:Elizabeth Moon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nobody else in Category:American fantasy writers and Category:American science fiction writers has one, also there is nothing to put in the category but herself and Category:Elizabeth Moon novels which belongs to - and already is in - Category:Fantasy books by author, like everybody else's. Malyctenar 14:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Category:Fictional preteens
Category:Fictional preteens (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Basically, fictional characters by age is supposed to be a way of categorizing fictional characters by how long they've lived. Category:Fictional centenarians includes any character over 100 years. It would be feasible to create Category:Fictional characters over 1000 years old as a subcategory (but it would also be pointless). "Fictional preteens" categorizes characters by their inclusion to a small age group, roughly 11-12. It even described "too old to be considered children", when I would describe preteens AS children. Many characters grow up on television, and pass through preteen phases which makes them warrant inclusion. In fact, any character that's lived to be a preteen should be included. This category baffles me. ~Zythe 13:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Categories for fictional children, teenagers and adults were deleted, and this should be deleted for the same reasons. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 15:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Category:Pikmin characters
Category:Pikmin characters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Childless category. Combination 12:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Category:Maffei group
Category:Maffei group to Category:IC 342/Maffei Group
- Rename - This group is more frequently referred to as the "IC 342/Maffei Group" than as the "Maffei Group", "Maffei 1 Group", or "IC 342 Group". George J. Bendo 11:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Category:People from Guilford
Category:People from Guilford (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
It should be people from Guildford, have moved articles to correct one. WikiGull 10:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment There are 7 places called Guilford in the United States. ReeseM 12:55, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Category:South Australian parliaments
Category:South Australian parliaments into Category:Members of South Australian parliaments by term
- Merge, Articles with similar titles are divided between the two categories. Consistent with category titles for other Australian states - see Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Australian politics/Parliaments#Progress Table. MH au 04:59, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Category:Single-party system parties
- Category:Single-party system parties to Category:Parties of single-party systems
- Slightly less confusing formulation;
- Places "Parties", the category's subject, at the name's head. (Parent category is Category:Political parties.)
- David Kernow (talk) 03:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Rename as nom. David Kernow (talk) 03:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Rename for clarity per nom. --Dhartung | Talk 04:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- RenameWissahickon Creek 14:24, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Category:Sports organisations
For spelling consistency please rename Category:Sports organisations to Category:Sports organizations. BR, Brz7 01:40, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: we usually leave dialect-based spelling choices in the hands of the creator unless it is inappropriate for the context. --Dhartung | Talk 04:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposed McStandarisation. ReeseM 12:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Category:Fictional cowards
Category:Fictional cowards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Too subjective. Reached no consensus before, let's try this again. Every fictional character has something cowardly in their histories, even Superman. This is ridiculous and serves no point to any sort of research. For example, The Doctor described himself as a coward in one episode, although I doubt anyone would think to add him. It's just silly over-categorization.~Zythe 00:45, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Impossible to make objective, and not very useful even if we did so. --Dhartung | Talk 04:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete this for violating WP:NPOV, WP:OR, and maybe WP:SP if cowardice is a major plot point. Doczilla 09:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - This category has a major POV problem and should be deleted. George J. Bendo 11:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)