Revision as of 17:28, 12 January 2007 editHipal (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers138,039 edits Kirkland Institute for Implant Survival Syndrome← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:46, 12 January 2007 edit undoIlena (talk | contribs)1,128 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Kirkland Institute for Implant Survival Syndrome== | ==Kirkland Institute for Implant Survival Syndrome== | ||
I've removed the link again. No offense is intended. I'm sure that this institute is important to her, but it needs to be demonstrated with a ], ]. Then the institute could be mentioned in the body of the article itself, and references given to both the source and to the institute itself. Linking to the institute from the External links section without any mention of it elsewhere looks like an attempt at promotion, which goes against ] and ]. --] 17:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC) | I've removed the link again. No offense is intended. I'm sure that this institute is important to her, but it needs to be demonstrated with a ], ]. Then the institute could be mentioned in the body of the article itself, and references given to both the source and to the institute itself. Linking to the institute from the External links section without any mention of it elsewhere looks like an attempt at promotion, which goes against ] and ]. --] 17:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
::I feel cyberstalked by Ronz. He knows nothing about Sally Kirkland and has made a job out of editing out every link I add and than complaining about being attacked. This link is important to Sally Kirkland's life work. I am restoring it. Ronz, please leave me alone. Your bias is so overwelming against me that you have lost all objectivity. Thank you. ] 17:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:46, 12 January 2007
Biography Unassessed | |||||||
|
Kirkland Institute for Implant Survival Syndrome
I've removed the link again. No offense is intended. I'm sure that this institute is important to her, but it needs to be demonstrated with a verifiable, reliable source. Then the institute could be mentioned in the body of the article itself, and references given to both the source and to the institute itself. Linking to the institute from the External links section without any mention of it elsewhere looks like an attempt at promotion, which goes against WP:EL and WP:SPAM. --Ronz 17:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- I feel cyberstalked by Ronz. He knows nothing about Sally Kirkland and has made a job out of editing out every link I add and than complaining about being attacked. This link is important to Sally Kirkland's life work. I am restoring it. Ronz, please leave me alone. Your bias is so overwelming against me that you have lost all objectivity. Thank you. Ilena 17:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)