Revision as of 15:44, 2 August 2022 editDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators407,389 edits Caution: Personal attack directed at a specific editor.Tag: Twinkle← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:59, 3 August 2022 edit undoDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators407,389 edits Warning: Three-revert rule.Tag: TwinkleNext edit → | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
] Please do not ] other editors. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. ''Please do NOT refer to other editors as "Rama's minions".''<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> ] (]) 15:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC) | ] Please do not ] other editors. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. ''Please do NOT refer to other editors as "Rama's minions".''<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> ] (]) 15:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC) | ||
] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 00:59, 3 August 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:59, 3 August 2022
April 2018
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Edi Rama has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Edi Rama was changed by Albwiki001 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897078 on 2018-04-04T14:18:48+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:18, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
August 2022
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Please do NOT refer to other editors as "Rama's minions". Drmies (talk) 15:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Drmies (talk) 00:59, 3 August 2022 (UTC)