| Revision as of 22:28, 24 August 2022 editCrimeAlert (talk | contribs)7 edits →John Barnes rap: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:41, 24 August 2022 edit undoCrimeAlert (talk | contribs)7 edits →John Barnes rapNext edit → | ||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
| Do you have a personal problem with John Barnes' musical contribution to the NWO song subsequently outshining it? I cannot square your claims that it has no independent notability, with the evidence that is all around that it does. I could perhaps understand your deleterious actions if the NWO song page contained the equivalent information, but it does not. You apparent aim appears to me to be to scrub this information from Misplaced Pages. Help me understand what possible alternative motive you might have. Independent notability is established beyond doubt. ] (]) 22:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC) | Do you have a personal problem with John Barnes' musical contribution to the NWO song subsequently outshining it? I cannot square your claims that it has no independent notability, with the evidence that is all around that it does. I could perhaps understand your deleterious actions if the NWO song page contained the equivalent information, but it does not. You apparent aim appears to me to be to scrub this information from Misplaced Pages. Help me understand what possible alternative motive you might have. Independent notability is established beyond doubt. ] (]) 22:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC) | ||
| To further explain, I would like you to acknowledge that your statement "The only source does not make the distinction of the rap from the song" is a complete lie. The source quite literally refers to the rap as the only part of the song most fans remember. Why do they say that? Because it is now largely remembered in isolation. It is now known as a distinct thing, which grew beyond the original song (and was almost never even included in it). Your insistence in forcing people to see it as nothing but merely a verse in a supposedly well remembered song, an indivisible relationship, is a perverse distortion of proven established reality. Which begs the question, why? What is your motive for distorting the reality of how this rap outgrew the song, gaining iconic status in of itself? What is your motive for pretending nobody ever writes about the rap unless they are also writing about the song in an equal and indivisible way? It is historical context at best. | |||
Revision as of 22:41, 24 August 2022
|
Disambiguation link notification for July 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lynda La Plante, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newton.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:46, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Lampton School
Hello, I don't want to get into an argument at all and I am totally fine with you removing the stuff from the Liverpool, West Derby pages if you really don't think it fits, but I do disagree with the Lampton School content removal. You say that happened "in proximity", but it was in the school's grounds and what it is mostly known for outside the area today. In fairness the section probably is too long, but I do think there should be some mention of it. BarehamOliver (talk) 15:27, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
John Barnes rap
Do you have a personal problem with John Barnes' musical contribution to the NWO song subsequently outshining it? I cannot square your claims that it has no independent notability, with the evidence that is all around that it does. I could perhaps understand your deleterious actions if the NWO song page contained the equivalent information, but it does not. You apparent aim appears to me to be to scrub this information from Misplaced Pages. Help me understand what possible alternative motive you might have. Independent notability is established beyond doubt. CrimeAlert (talk) 22:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
To further explain, I would like you to acknowledge that your statement "The only source does not make the distinction of the rap from the song" is a complete lie. The source quite literally refers to the rap as the only part of the song most fans remember. Why do they say that? Because it is now largely remembered in isolation. It is now known as a distinct thing, which grew beyond the original song (and was almost never even included in it). Your insistence in forcing people to see it as nothing but merely a verse in a supposedly well remembered song, an indivisible relationship, is a perverse distortion of proven established reality. Which begs the question, why? What is your motive for distorting the reality of how this rap outgrew the song, gaining iconic status in of itself? What is your motive for pretending nobody ever writes about the rap unless they are also writing about the song in an equal and indivisible way? It is historical context at best.