Misplaced Pages

Talk:Miso Film: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:04, 5 January 2023 editFram (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors247,926 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit← Previous edit Revision as of 01:20, 6 January 2023 edit undoRevirvlkodlaku (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users84,762 edits →Sourcing instead of removingNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:


Can you perhaps explain why you are on the one hand so hellbent on removing unsourced entries, but on the other hand have now repeatedly removed the single ref from Dicte, 1864, ...? Because it gets harder and harder to know what you want or expect here. ] (]) 19:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC) Can you perhaps explain why you are on the one hand so hellbent on removing unsourced entries, but on the other hand have now repeatedly removed the single ref from Dicte, 1864, ...? Because it gets harder and harder to know what you want or expect here. ] (]) 19:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

: Hi @], please try to be courteous when communicating with me (or anyone else, for that matter). It's much nicer, more collegial, and will get you better results in the end. It's not difficult to know what I want, but it's definitely easier when you have the willingness to see things from my perspective. I have deleted unreferenced entries, and I have removed reference tags that I felt were redundant, since they were appended to linked pages, where it is easy enough to see that Miso Film is a production company attached to the project. Those entries do not require additional referencing, IMO, whereas seemingly random, unlinked entries do. Hope that helps. ] (]) 01:20, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:20, 6 January 2023

WikiProject iconCompanies Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconDenmark Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sourcing instead of removing

Removing unsourced entries from this page isn't helpful, it is quite clear that the entries were correct. Much better to source them, to tag the ones you can't find with CN (after doing some good searching), and to add entries still missing from the list. But please stop removing entries just for the sake of it, it isn't helpful. Fram (talk) 15:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)


Can you perhaps explain why you are on the one hand so hellbent on removing unsourced entries, but on the other hand have now repeatedly removed the single ref from Dicte, 1864, ...? Because it gets harder and harder to know what you want or expect here. Fram (talk) 19:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Fram, please try to be courteous when communicating with me (or anyone else, for that matter). It's much nicer, more collegial, and will get you better results in the end. It's not difficult to know what I want, but it's definitely easier when you have the willingness to see things from my perspective. I have deleted unreferenced entries, and I have removed reference tags that I felt were redundant, since they were appended to linked pages, where it is easy enough to see that Miso Film is a production company attached to the project. Those entries do not require additional referencing, IMO, whereas seemingly random, unlinked entries do. Hope that helps. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:20, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
Talk:Miso Film: Difference between revisions Add topic