Revision as of 08:08, 8 April 2023 editCommunity Tech bot (talk | contribs)Bots269,274 edits Files used on this page or its Wikidata item are up for deletion← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:46, 31 August 2023 edit undoJasavina (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users922 edits →Direct Impingement vs Internal Piston: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app editNext edit → | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2023-04-08T08:08:08.461298 | PM md. 63.jpg --> | * ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2023-04-08T08:08:08.461298 | PM md. 63.jpg --> | ||
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 08:08, 8 April 2023 (UTC) | Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 08:08, 8 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
== Direct Impingement vs Internal Piston == | |||
The article incorrectly refers to the mechanism for the M16 platform as "direct | |||
impingement" multiple times, but does also call out this general misconception in one section. Is there any opposition to fixing the incorrect terminology? The operating mechanism is more correctly called "internal piston." ] (]) 18:46, 31 August 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:46, 31 August 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Comparison of the AK-47 and M16 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 4 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:59, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Comparability truly inherently given?
I’m a bit bewildered about the lemma. There’s many distinguishing particularities between the two, beginning with unmatched prevalence (100M vs. a mere 8kk) and development philosophies, regarding caliber and ballistic profiles, etc., and even more eminently, concerning rather recent perspectives, i.e. the AK still happily been deployed around the globe, with the M-16 mostly replaced by civilian and ordinance derivatives. Sure, you can always compare two assault rifles, but both layman and specialist ought to perceive incomparable features of these unrelated makes. And of course the article is far too substantial to be contested, yet still, I find the comparison of those models, to at least some degree, questionable. -- Gohnarch 20:56, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Why does is the STG44 on this page instead of the SKS?
The M14 was the rifle the USA army used before they started using the M16, and this is not the case with the STG44 and the AK WHYYYYYYYY!!!!!1??????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hafflockman (talk • contribs) 14:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:08, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Direct Impingement vs Internal Piston
The article incorrectly refers to the mechanism for the M16 platform as "direct impingement" multiple times, but does also call out this general misconception in one section. Is there any opposition to fixing the incorrect terminology? The operating mechanism is more correctly called "internal piston." Jasavina (talk) 18:46, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- B-Class Firearms articles
- Mid-importance Firearms articles
- WikiProject Firearms articles
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- B-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- Start-Class Soviet Union articles
- Mid-importance Soviet Union articles
- WikiProject Soviet Union articles
- Start-Class Russia articles
- Mid-importance Russia articles
- Mid-importance Start-Class Russia articles
- Start-Class Russia (technology and engineering) articles
- Technology and engineering in Russia task force articles
- Start-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Unassessed Vietnam articles
- Unknown-importance Vietnam articles
- All WikiProject Vietnam pages
- Misplaced Pages articles that use American English