| Revision as of 21:21, 17 April 2007 editDacy69 (talk | contribs)1,605 edits →Armenian-Azerbaijan Arbitration← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:25, 17 April 2007 edit undoDacy69 (talk | contribs)1,605 edits →Armenian-Azerbaijan ArbitrationNext edit → | ||
| Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
| ::Hi Kirill, I apologize for this situation. ] added the material without discussing them, he merely wrote that he added sources...his wordings were POV and unencyclopedic. Marshall removed it as it was already discussed previously. Sorry that my tone in the quote above was interpreted by Dacy69 along the national lines, it was what I felt as, his misconceptions. What Dacy69 interpreted as such was an answer to his statement: "You are just desperately trying to protect this page from truth." It is very difficult to debate with someone who sees only bad about Armenians and then adds in Armenian related articles one sided material with the mentality of "exposing" the "truth" about Armenians and without prior discussion and when removed, claims that I am desperately trying to protect the page from this "truth" he likes to speak of. Dacy69 does not understand that Misplaced Pages role is...to publish information about something and not truth. He proposed mediation and then took my answer as a refusal of the mediation, when I clarified to him what was mediation and his misconception of what mediation is. If he wants mediation, he should first understand that its role is not to prove that he is right. He understands it as either he can add everything he wants without proper discussion or either it is mediation, and frankly, that is not how it works. I also wish that the arbitration take a closer look at ]'s conduct as he is still continue to bait Armenian editors. Thanks - ] 21:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | ::Hi Kirill, I apologize for this situation. ] added the material without discussing them, he merely wrote that he added sources...his wordings were POV and unencyclopedic. Marshall removed it as it was already discussed previously. Sorry that my tone in the quote above was interpreted by Dacy69 along the national lines, it was what I felt as, his misconceptions. What Dacy69 interpreted as such was an answer to his statement: "You are just desperately trying to protect this page from truth." It is very difficult to debate with someone who sees only bad about Armenians and then adds in Armenian related articles one sided material with the mentality of "exposing" the "truth" about Armenians and without prior discussion and when removed, claims that I am desperately trying to protect the page from this "truth" he likes to speak of. Dacy69 does not understand that Misplaced Pages role is...to publish information about something and not truth. He proposed mediation and then took my answer as a refusal of the mediation, when I clarified to him what was mediation and his misconception of what mediation is. If he wants mediation, he should first understand that its role is not to prove that he is right. He understands it as either he can add everything he wants without proper discussion or either it is mediation, and frankly, that is not how it works. I also wish that the arbitration take a closer look at ]'s conduct as he is still continue to bait Armenian editors. Thanks - ] 21:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| My explanation, refrences and quotation on talkpage speak for itself. The problem whatever I wrote is not acceptable for certain people. I do not consider for example what ] writes on Azerbaijan related pages bad though I disagree with him sometimes, still I am able to work on solution. Others don't.--] 21:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | My explanation, refrences and quotation on talkpage speak for itself. The problem whatever I wrote is not acceptable for certain people. I do not consider for example what ] writes on Azerbaijan related pages bad though I disagree with him sometimes, still I am able to work on solution. Others don't. We are all advised to assume good faith and work on compromise version. I do not consider mediation as a tool to endorse my version. I had previous experience in DR and know outcomes. Editors who refuses to go for DR perhaps have poor reasoning or simply are afraid and protecting pages just like they own them. --] 21:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Question == | == Question == | ||
Revision as of 21:25, 17 April 2007
|
Archives |
| I am open to recall as an administrator. I do not place any restrictions on the petitioners beyond the standard ones found here; however, I reserve the right to disregard any petition that is unrelated to my use of administrative tools or my behavior as an administrator. | |
help
Hi,I received some vandalism warnings few days ago and I dont know why. I think somebody is using my username to vandalise articles. Is this possible? If yes, how can I stop him? Should I change my username? Misplaced Pages is one of my hobbies and im trying to have as much good contributions as I can.Please help me fix this problem, cheers. Eurocopter Tigre 20:50, 15 March 2007 (EET)
help 2
Thanks for your help. Im a bit less stressed now. Hope nobody will block me if the vandals are using my username again, cheers.
PS: Military history is one of my hobbies and I really like your articles about the Battle of Ceresole and Italian War of 1521. Eurocopter Tigre 21:14, 15 March 2007 (EET)
request
Can you please delete the Dorin Danilă article. The real name of the chief of the Romanian Naval Forces is Dorin Dănilă(I also created an article with his real name). Cheers, Eurocopter Tigre 16:27, 17 March 2007
Coordinator work
Hey, is there any MILHIST coordinator work (updating assessment statistics, maintaining the active members list, etc.) you'd like to pass along to someone else? I'm sure you have scripts, etc., to do most of the actual work, but if there are any tasks you'd like to foist on to one of us, I'm more than willing to take on a little extra work - provided you can give a little bit of guidance... Carom 00:11, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well, it will be time consuming, but I think it will be worth it. One way to go about it would be to create a subpage somewhere (userspace, maybe?) that divides the project members by their stated interests/specialties. Creating such a list would be time-intensive, but would be fairly easy to maintain, and would also make it fairly easy to find 8 or 10 (or more) users who might be interested in a particular review, as we could make it as fine-grained as we liked. Carom 01:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- That's probably a better location for it. I'd be willing to start compiling the list - provided, of course, that that seems like the best course of action. Presumably we'd notify editors with some kind of subst'd template that would produce a message like "An article that you may be interested in, Example Article, has been nominated for (A/FA/Peer) Review. If you would like to contribute, you can do so here (discussion subpage). If you would prefer not to recieve these notifications in future, please leave a comment here (coordinators talk page?)." Or something to that effect? Carom 01:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I've left a note on the coordinator talk page, and in a few minutes I'll set up the page itself (although any actual work might have to wait until I get home from work later on tonight). Carom 01:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- It's a fair point - I'll add whatever specifications, etc. have been provided by the members. Carom 04:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- OK, the lists are coming along (although not finished, by any means). I'd kind of like to take this for a test drive and see what the response is. I'm assuming we want to rustle up something subst:able to put on people's talk pages, and I'm also assuming we need a different subst:able something for each kind of review - is this correct? Carom 05:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Cool, thanks! I'll tweak them a bit and then take them out for spin at thenext opportunity. Carom 13:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I've started using the templates (the peer review for Hugo Stoltzenberg and the A-class review for Eiríkr Hákonarson are the first two), so I guess we'll see if this works or not... Carom 18:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Hmm...
Any idea on what's happened here (Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Kirill Lokshin) ? I know it's an archived page, but it may either be because a bot has malfunctioned as some edited the page after it closed, or it may have happened on another page. Thanks, Spawn Man 06:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- 36 supports? :) Those were the days... --kingboyk 11:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed. ;-)
- (It looks like someone's signature is bleeding a color tag to the following text, I think.) Kirill Lokshin 11:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Lol, I remember someone passed with just 19 votes. Quite amusing looking back on it. :) Spawn Man 11:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- More amusing to me personally is that I got more votes than Kirill Lokshin!! :) --kingboyk 12:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC) (not by much tho)
- Lol, I remember someone passed with just 19 votes. Quite amusing looking back on it. :) Spawn Man 11:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Quite funny though is that someone voted twice on Kirill's RfA & it didn't get discounted lol... ;) Spawn Man 03:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Proposed list of characteristics of attack sites, webpages, and forum posts
See Wikipedia_talk:Attack_sites#What_is_an_.22attack_site.22 I hope that you can comment on what I wrote there. Andries 08:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Village Pump conversation regarding talk page templates
See here this concerns several aspects of the WikiProject templates and their implementation. Quadzilla99 01:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
British anti-invasion preparations of World War II
I thought that you might like to know that British anti-invasion preparations of World War II, an article to which you have previously contributed, has been put forward as a featured article candidate. Thank you for your help. If you would like to comment on this article's nomination, please see here. Your opinions will be most welcome. Gaius Cornelius 12:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Photograph Dispute on the B-36 Article Page
This particular issue goes awhile back. I've done the suggested advice and let the situation cool down before I attempt to resolve this situation.
This is the problem, the user Rogerd has been trying to put his personal photograph on the B-36 article. He does not hide the fact that he took it since it is featured on his personal photograph gallery http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Rogerd/photo_gallery
I feel very strongly that he is bias towards his photograph versus the official U.S. Air Force photograph taken of the same aircraft, which in my opinion, is of better quality and is not crooked. In addition, this photograph does not show any museum spectators and does not obsecure the aircraft from view and shows more of the aircraft http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:060315-F-1234P-001.jpg
I feel that I was unfairly overwhelmed by his inner circle of users on Wiki and the dispute is still unresolved in my opinion.
-Signaleer 18:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 16 | 16 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Maniots peer review
Hey Kirill. Sorry to disturb you but the Maniots article has been up for peer review now for around a fortnight with no comments. If you have the time, could you possibly give me your opinion. Thanks. Kyriakos 09:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Armenian-Azerbaijan Arbitration
I would like to report that while I have worked on editing page where I made edit based on 5 references user:MarshallBagramyan removed it without discussion (he is not covered by Arbcom parole) but used inappropriate language , and later user:Fedayee came with comments aling the national lines the same tactis again exploited. Users, not covered by parole, make blind reverts, then others step forward with accusation along the national line. I made offer for mediation but it was not accepted. In the meantime, I have other positive experience with user:Aivazovsky on page . But some other users, like Fedayee, keep attacking me on the ground of ethnic affiliation.--Dacy69 14:16, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ethnic affiliation aside, pov pushing is pov pushing. You just happen to be the one disrupting a good article.-- Ευπάτωρ 17:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- This guy does nothing but make provocative edits and complains about them whenever someone disagrees with him. He rarely discusses his edits on the talk yet expects everyone to accept them lest we be accused of "suppressing the truth". What kind of atmosphere does he expect to be treated in? Ethnic affiliation remains irrelevant when all you do aggressively pov push.--MarshallBagramyan 20:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Kirill, I apologize for this situation. user:Dacy69 added the material without discussing them, he merely wrote that he added sources...his wordings were POV and unencyclopedic. Marshall removed it as it was already discussed previously. Sorry that my tone in the quote above was interpreted by Dacy69 along the national lines, it was what I felt as, his misconceptions. What Dacy69 interpreted as such was an answer to his statement: "You are just desperately trying to protect this page from truth." It is very difficult to debate with someone who sees only bad about Armenians and then adds in Armenian related articles one sided material with the mentality of "exposing" the "truth" about Armenians and without prior discussion and when removed, claims that I am desperately trying to protect the page from this "truth" he likes to speak of. Dacy69 does not understand that Misplaced Pages role is...to publish information about something and not truth. He proposed mediation and then took my answer as a refusal of the mediation, when I clarified to him what was mediation and his misconception of what mediation is. If he wants mediation, he should first understand that its role is not to prove that he is right. He understands it as either he can add everything he wants without proper discussion or either it is mediation, and frankly, that is not how it works. I also wish that the arbitration take a closer look at user:Atabek's conduct as he is still continue to bait Armenian editors. Thanks - Fedayee 21:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
My explanation, refrences and quotation on talkpage speak for itself. The problem whatever I wrote is not acceptable for certain people. I do not consider for example what user:Aivazovsky writes on Azerbaijan related pages bad though I disagree with him sometimes, still I am able to work on solution. Others don't. We are all advised to assume good faith and work on compromise version. I do not consider mediation as a tool to endorse my version. I had previous experience in DR and know outcomes. Editors who refuses to go for DR perhaps have poor reasoning or simply are afraid and protecting pages just like they own them. --Dacy69 21:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Question
Sometimes when I hit edit submit it says I'm autoblocked because my school ip was used by User:Cheeselord5. Please help me Kirill. --Pupster21 Talk To Me 20:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC) PS If you help, you may recieve a shiny star. ;)
American Civil War
Can you nom it for FA? Thanks. --Pupster21 Talk To Me 20:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)