Misplaced Pages

Weipa Dispute: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:34, 9 December 2024 editNHCLS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users9,037 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 23:42, 13 December 2024 edit undoNHCLS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users9,037 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 23: Line 23:


== Background == == Background ==
] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]
== History == == History ==


On 13 October 1995, the 75 unionised miners voted unanimously to launch ]. They would subsequently set up the first picket line in Weipa's history blocking a bridge on the ].<ref name="CSCL Defending">{{cite web|date=1 January 2020|title=Defending Unionism: The Weipa Dispute, 1995|url=https://commonslibrary.org/defending-unionism-the-weipa-dispute-1995/|author-last=Ross|author-first=Liz|access-date=13 November 2024|work=]}}</ref> The striking miners then set up a further picket line using boats to block the port of Weipa after the company attempted to circumvent the picket line by ferrying non-unionised workers across the river.<ref name="RedFlag 75">{{cite web|date=26 November 2015|title=The Weipa strike: when 75 workers took on a mining giant|url=https://redflag.org.au/node/5036|author-last=Jackson|author-first=Carl|access-date=20 November 2024|work=]}}</ref>
In mid-October,

<ref>{{cite web|date=23 October 1995|title=80 on strike in CRA war|url=https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/80-on-strike-in-cra-war-19951023-k6lze|author-last=Davis|author-first=Mark|access-date=20 November 2024|work=]}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web|date=23 October 1995|title=80 on strike in CRA war|url=https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/80-on-strike-in-cra-war-19951023-k6lze|author-last=Davis|author-first=Mark|access-date=20 November 2024|work=]}}</ref>


<ref>{{cite web|date=14 November 1995|title=Strike spreads over Comalco writs at Weipa|url=https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/strike-spreads-over-comalco-writs-weipa|author-last=Mason|author-first=Bill|access-date=20 November 2024|work=]}}</ref> On 10 November, the ] announced that it would allow the company to take common-law action against the striking miners. The company subsequently filed a motion with the ] asking for an injuction against the miners.<ref>{{cite web|date=14 November 1995|title=Strike spreads over Comalco writs at Weipa|url=https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/strike-spreads-over-comalco-writs-weipa|author-last=Mason|author-first=Bill|access-date=20 November 2024|work=]}}</ref>


<ref>{{cite web|date=21 November 1995|title=Weipa workers defend union rights|url=https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/weipa-workers-defend-union-rights|author-last=Thompson|author-first=Jennifer|access-date=20 November 2024|work=]}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web|date=21 November 1995|title=Weipa workers defend union rights|url=https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/weipa-workers-defend-union-rights|author-last=Thompson|author-first=Jennifer|access-date=20 November 2024|work=]}}</ref>
Line 48: Line 49:
<ref>{{cite web|date=1 December 2002|title=The Strategic Use of Individual Employment Agreements: Three Case Studies|url=https://cleo.rutgers.edu/articles/the-strategic-use-of-individual-employment-agreements-three-case-studies/|author-last=Fetter|author-first=Joel|access-date=20 November 2024|work=Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web|date=1 December 2002|title=The Strategic Use of Individual Employment Agreements: Three Case Studies|url=https://cleo.rutgers.edu/articles/the-strategic-use-of-individual-employment-agreements-three-case-studies/|author-last=Fetter|author-first=Joel|access-date=20 November 2024|work=Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law}}</ref>


⚫ <ref>{{cite web|date=21 October 2015|title=20 years after Weipa, the union movement must maintain that 'line in the sand'|url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-21/lewis-the-union-movement-must-maintain-that-line-in-the-sand/6872368|author-last=Lewis|author-first=Peter|access-date=13 November 2024|work=]}}</ref>

<ref>{{cite web|date=26 November 2015|title=The Weipa strike: when 75 workers took on a mining giant|url=https://redflag.org.au/node/5036|author-last=Jackson|author-first=Carl|access-date=20 November 2024|work=]}}</ref>

<ref>{{cite web|date=1 January 2020|title=Defending Unionism: The Weipa Dispute, 1995|url=https://commonslibrary.org/defending-unionism-the-weipa-dispute-1995/|author-last=Ross|author-first=Liz|access-date=13 November 2024|work=]}}</ref>


== Reactions == == Reactions ==
=== Contemporary ===
Prominent trade unionist ] described the Weipa Dispute in November 1995 as "a line in the sand. For us to be beaten is for the union movement to lose its heart, its soul and its purpose."<ref name="ABC 20"/>

=== Historical assessments ===
⚫ Peter Lewis of the ] has described the Weipa Dispute as "fundamental to the development of Australian labour relations," saying that it aimed to ensure "that corporations can't actively discriminate against union members."<ref name="ABC 20">{{cite web|date=21 October 2015|title=20 years after Weipa, the union movement must maintain that 'line in the sand'|url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-21/lewis-the-union-movement-must-maintain-that-line-in-the-sand/6872368|author-last=Lewis|author-first=Peter|access-date=13 November 2024|work=]}}</ref>


== In popular culture == == In popular culture ==

Revision as of 23:42, 13 December 2024

This article, Weipa Dispute, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author
Weipa Dispute
Date13 October 1995 (1995-10-13) – Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "?".  1995 (1995-??-??)
LocationWeipa, Queensland, Australia
MethodsStrike action

The Weipa Dispute was from 13 October to 1995.

Background

Weipa Prices and Incomes Accord Comalco Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union Bob Hawke

History

On 13 October 1995, the 75 unionised miners voted unanimously to launch strike action. They would subsequently set up the first picket line in Weipa's history blocking a bridge on the Mission River. The striking miners then set up a further picket line using boats to block the port of Weipa after the company attempted to circumvent the picket line by ferrying non-unionised workers across the river.

On 10 November, the Australian Industrial Relations Commission announced that it would allow the company to take common-law action against the striking miners. The company subsequently filed a motion with the Supreme Court of Queensland asking for an injuction against the miners.


Reactions

Contemporary

Prominent trade unionist Bill Kelty described the Weipa Dispute in November 1995 as "a line in the sand. For us to be beaten is for the union movement to lose its heart, its soul and its purpose."

Historical assessments

Peter Lewis of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation has described the Weipa Dispute as "fundamental to the development of Australian labour relations," saying that it aimed to ensure "that corporations can't actively discriminate against union members."

In popular culture

Paddy Gorman, then editor of the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union's journal Common Cause, published a book in 1996 titled Weipa: Where Australian unions drew their 'line in the sand' with CRA about the Dispute.

References

  1. Ross, Liz (1 January 2020). "Defending Unionism: The Weipa Dispute, 1995". Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 13 November 2024.
  2. Jackson, Carl (26 November 2015). "The Weipa strike: when 75 workers took on a mining giant". Red Flag. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  3. Davis, Mark (23 October 1995). "80 on strike in CRA war". Australian Financial Review. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  4. Mason, Bill (14 November 1995). "Strike spreads over Comalco writs at Weipa". Green Left. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  5. Thompson, Jennifer (21 November 1995). "Weipa workers defend union rights". Green Left. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  6. Way, Nicholas (27 November 1995). "Union solidarity over Weipa hides a split". Australian Financial Review. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  7. Aiken, Bob (11 December 1995). "Miners Strike Wins Widespread Support In Australia". The Militant. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  8. Bull, Sue (12 December 1995). "Lessons from the Weipa struggle". Green Left. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  9. "IRC ruling no cause for gloating". Australian Financial Review. 24 January 1996. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  10. Vassilopoulos, James (25 June 1997). "Union renewal at Weipa". Green Left. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  11. Floyd, Louise Willans (1 January 1999). "Weipa and the wharves: Australian strike law" (PDF). University of Tasmanian Law Review. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  12. Fetter, Joel (1 December 2002). "The Strategic Use of Individual Employment Agreements: Three Case Studies". Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  13. ^ Lewis, Peter (21 October 2015). "20 years after Weipa, the union movement must maintain that 'line in the sand'". ABC News. Retrieved 13 November 2024.
  14. Thompson, Jennifer (28 February 1996). "Weipa: record of a strike". Green Left. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
Categories: