| Revision as of 10:17, 14 January 2025 editJayen466 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers56,646 edits →Israel's spending on influencing public opinion, including English Misplaced Pages, to increase twentyfold: m← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:53, 14 January 2025 edit undoJayen466 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers56,646 edits →Israel's spending on influencing public opinion, including English Misplaced Pages, to increase twentyfold: mNext edit → | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| === Israel's spending on influencing public opinion, including English Misplaced Pages, to increase twentyfold === | === Israel's spending on influencing public opinion, including English Misplaced Pages, to increase twentyfold === | ||
| The article about the Heritage Foundation came on the heels of another ''Forward'' published on December 28, 2024, titled "Israel has spent millions trying win hearts and minds abroad. It's about to spend 20 times more." This stated that as part of a coalition agreement with new Foreign Minister ], the ] had massively increased its budget for ]. The reason for this was that measures taken in the past – including a project called "National Vision" set up to influence the English Misplaced Pages – had not been successful enough, said the ''Forward'' article, citing an October 31, 2024 by the Israeli ]. According to the Shomrim report, the "National Vision" organization, founded by ] politician ], was "designed to highlight the Israeli government's narrative on the English Misplaced Pages and to distribute advocacy videos in Russian". – {{small|]}} | The article about the Heritage Foundation came on the heels of another ''Forward'' published on December 28, 2024, titled "Israel has spent millions trying to win hearts and minds abroad. It's about to spend 20 times more." This stated that as part of a coalition agreement with new Foreign Minister ], the ] had massively increased its budget for ]. | ||
| The reason for this was that measures taken in the past – including a project called "National Vision" set up to influence the English Misplaced Pages – had not been successful enough, said the ''Forward'' article, citing an October 31, 2024 by the Israeli ]. According to the Shomrim report, the "National Vision" organization, founded by ] politician ], was "designed to highlight the Israeli government's narrative on the English Misplaced Pages and to distribute advocacy videos in Russian". – {{small|]}} | |||
| === Elon Musk, Wokepedia, and all that jazz === | === Elon Musk, Wokepedia, and all that jazz === | ||
Revision as of 10:53, 14 January 2025
 Article display preview: Mike Peel – CC-BY SA 4.0In the mediaWill you be targeted?A Heritage duck? Elon and the gang behaving badly! | This is a draft of a potential Signpost article, and should not be interpreted as a finished piece. Its content is subject to review by the editorial team and ultimately by JPxG, the editor in chief. Please do not link to this draft as it is unfinished and the URL will change upon publication. If you would like to contribute and are familiar with the requirements of a Signpost article, feel free to be bold in making improvements!
Last revised 10:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC) (3 days ago) by Jayen466 (refresh) | ||||
Y ... has a title defined.
N ... is not yet approved for publication.
In the media
Will you be targeted?
Contribute — Share this By Bri, Jonatan Svensson Glad, Oltrepier, Smallbones and Andreas Kolbe
Optional: write a lede — not necessarily a WP:LEAD. Interesting > encyclopedic.
Heritage Foundation plans to identify and target Misplaced Pages editors?
An exclusive report by investigative journalist Arno Rosenfeld for The Forward, published January 7, 2025, reveals that the Heritage Foundation has elaborated a plan to "identify and target" Misplaced Pages editors who the group says are "abusing their position" by publishing content the group believes to be antisemitic, although it's not exactly clear what kind of antisemitism this effort is intended to address. According to the report, which was later also quoted by Gizmodo, the plan includes using facial recognition software and information from database breaches (including usernames and passwords), applying natural language processing to find "style, repeated phrases, and content patterns", creating fake accounts to trick other editors into divulging personal details, and other means to detect coordinated editing.
Although it's not possible to determine whether the Heritage Foundation has already started the scheme, the slide deck shared by The Forward, titled "Misplaced Pages Editor Targeting", is still worth examining in detail. Under the heading "Technical Fingerprinting (Controlled Domain Redirects)", it states that the group will use "Controlled Links: Use redirects to capture IP addresses, browser fingerprints, and device data through a combination of in-browser fingerprinting scripts and HTML5 canvas techniques." They also will use "Technical Data Collection: Track geolocation, ISP, and network details from clicked links."
Under the heading "Online Human Intelligence (HUMINT)", the group proposes "Persona Engagement: Engage curated sock puppet accounts to reveal patterns and provoke reactions, information disclosure", as well as "Behavioral Manipulation: Push specific topics to expose more identity related details" and "Cross-Community Targeting: Interact across platforms to gather intelligence from other sources."
The Heritage Foundation is a conservative think tank that, despite being already known for its highly-influential role in the presidency of Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, has most recently returned to the spotlight for masterminding Project 2025, a controversial political blueprint for the incumbent Trump administration. In this case, however, the leaked pitch deck for the Misplaced Pages initiative was reportedly sent to prospective donors of Project Esther, an alleged plan to fight antisemitism and anti-Zionism, which has already faced criticism for failing to address antisemitism by right-wing figures, and seemingly recycling antisemitic tropes itself.
The Heritage Foundation has apparently been involved in a related case of rule-breaking on Misplaced Pages before. A 2017 sockpuppet investigation specifically centered on the think tank's article, and ended with the ban of five editors, ObjectivityAlways, Orthodox2014, LambdaChi, PAWiki, and MiamiDolphins3, who all had edited the Heritage Foundation article. Four of these editors had all registered over a short period in 2006.
ObjectivityAlways edited the page 168 times, the second most of any editor: their edits on the article include aggressive reversions of other editors, rearranging sections, basic housekeeping tasks, and whitewashing. For instance, they stated that Heritage is not affiliated with a political party, while removing a category that suggested the opposite. Orthodox2014 made 18 different edits to the article in February 2017, being more aggressive in reverting other editors and whitewashing the article than ObjectivityAlways had been.
Over twenty other editors were banned as apparent sockpuppets after editing the same article. Since most of these editors made five or fewer edits, it is difficult to say if they were supporters of Heritage; we estimate that about half could be considered "pro-Heritage". We remind readers that, based solely on Misplaced Pages's editing records, it's impossible to fully identify an editor or their employer: the editor may simply be trying to embarrass the subject of the article.
The Forward article quoted the reactions of Misplaced Pages users Tamzin and GorillaWarfare: the former stated the methods proposed by the slide deck were well-known by Misplaced Pages editors, saying quote, "It's scary they want to do this, but it’s not a 'zero-day'". GorillaWarfare said that "the document is sort of vague about what they would do once they ID a person, but the things that come to mind are not great."
Both the Heritage Foundation and the Wikimedia Foundation have declined to comment to both The Forward and Gizmodo. However, Misplaced Pages co-founder Jimmy Wales did respond personally to some of the concerns raised by users in a Village Pump discussion:
Well, I fully agree that developments in terms of arguments and actions aimed at destroying trust in knowledge (and of course our specific interest, trust in Misplaced Pages) are extremely worrisome, particularly as I agree that for many who are doing it, the motive does appears to be the undermining of civic norms and democracy. I also agree with Tryptofish in a part that you didn't quote: "In a narrow sense, it's technically true that if you 'out' yourself, there's no point in anyone else doing it. But once your identity is known, you become vulnerable to all of the kinds of real-life harassment that doxed people find themselves subjected to. It doesn't matter, in that regard, how they found out your identity." That's a sad balancing act that no Wikipedian should have to face.
As a side note, I don't think that the reliability of the Heritage Foundation as a source is particularly related to these despicable actions. Whether they should be considered a reliable source in some matters is really unrelated to whether they hate us or not.
These developments come as three volunteer Misplaced Pages editors are still directly involved in the ongoing court case between Asian News International and the WMF over at the Delhi High Court – see previous Signpost coverage here and here. – B, S, O
Israel's spending on influencing public opinion, including English Misplaced Pages, to increase twentyfold
The article about the Heritage Foundation came on the heels of another Forward article published on December 28, 2024, titled "Israel has spent millions trying to win hearts and minds abroad. It's about to spend 20 times more." This stated that as part of a coalition agreement with new Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar, the Israeli Foreign Ministry had massively increased its budget for influencing public opinion abroad.
The reason for this was that measures taken in the past – including a project called "National Vision" set up to influence the English Misplaced Pages – had not been successful enough, said the Forward article, citing an October 31, 2024 report by the Israeli Shomrim Center for Media and Democracy. According to the Shomrim report, the "National Vision" organization, founded by Likud politician Ariel Kallner, was "designed to highlight the Israeli government's narrative on the English Misplaced Pages and to distribute advocacy videos in Russian". – AK
Elon Musk, Wokepedia, and all that jazz
Elon Musk’s ongoing critique of Misplaced Pages continues to spark a media frenzy, with coverage from Newsweek, Newsmax, The New York Post, and Times of India, among others. Musk has accused the platform of being "woke" and discouraged donations, citing its DEI initiatives. His remarks also reignited his $1 billion joke offer to rename Misplaced Pages, prompting responses across X (see previous Signpost coverage). Snopes verified these events, while Daily Kos and The Philadelphia Inquirer examined how Musk’s criticisms align with broader right-wing media narratives targeting Misplaced Pages's perceived political leanings.
Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera also reported on the subject (in Italian, behind a pay-wall), noting that many users on X, as well as Threads and Bluesky, responded to Musk's taunt by inviting others to actually donate to Misplaced Pages. The Corriere also acknowledged the existence of the article about Ideological bias on Misplaced Pages, while reminding that Misplaced Pages is a collaborative platform where "transparency is a fundamental place to start from, but does not resolve every controversy", and that the presence of cognitive bias and prejudice stems from the behavior of users who actively edit pages, rather than the encyclopedia itself. – B, O
In brief
- Cambridge Bay, Nunavut grandpa: CBC News interviewed Misplaced Pages user Alan Sim, aka CambridgeBayWeather, an admin on en.wiki since 2005 with over 250,000 edits under his belt, who lives - where else? - in Cambridge Bay, Nunavut and contributes articles about Northern Canada such as Kátł'odeeche First Nation and every airport in the region. Having moved to Canada in 1978 from the UK, Sim edits because he "just enjoys it."
- I see your true cruinneas: As reported by TheJournal.ie, the Irish-language Misplaced Pages was mostly written by editors who did not speak Irish, including Amy Uí Ríordáin, the Gaeilge officer for Misplaced Pages Community Ireland, and Kevin Scannell, a mathematics professor based in St. Louis, Missouri. The story has a happy ending though, with the two and other volunteers growing increasingly confident in their own Irish skills as they kept improving ga.wiki. As Uí Ríordáin herself put it, "In terms of Vicipéid, I think it’s a really great way to do a bit of cleachtadh."
- Memories of the way we were: Rachel Bloom's Hugo Award-nominated video and other Wiki rabbit holes were remembered by a special year-end article on The A.V. Club, as part of their "Wiki Wormhole" series.
- Wiki Wars – Did Hamas "Win" the Edit Battle?: An article from the Washington Free Beacon highlights controversy over edits to Misplaced Pages’s coverage of the Israel–Hamas conflict following October 7. Allegedly, Misplaced Pages entries initially listed Hamas as victorious in several engagements, including battles in southern Israel; these sections were later removed, reportedly in response to criticism. The article takes several quotes from Wikipedians' discussion at Talk:List of military engagements during the Israel–Hamas war.
- RM reportedly produces "a weird Frankenstein result": A Wikipedian speaking to the Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles said the Requested move of the article formerly titled "2024 Nuseirat rescue operation" to its current namespace, Nuseirat rescue and massacre, "only highlights the schism and unhealthy détente between sides with profoundly differing perspectives and agendas."
- Lore, don't let me be misunderstood: TechXplore reported on a recent study by a team of researchers from Johns Hopkins University, University of British Columbia and University of Washington – currently published on the arXiv preprint server – who created and deployed a new AI tool, called INFOGAP, to look at how biographical information about LGBT people, including Brittney Griner, is presented across the English, Russian, and French versions of Misplaced Pages. The study concluded that "cultural and social biases significantly influence Misplaced Pages's multilingual content".
- Wild Wiki-panel appeared!: On January 4, 2025, during the 138th annual meeting of the American Historical Association in New York City, an in-person panel about Open Knowledge and the incorporation of the Misplaced Pages Student Program in History college courses took place. The event was named Pedagogical Praxis: How Faculty and Students Are Opening up the Field of History by Improving Misplaced Pages.
This page is a draft for the next issue of the Signpost. Below is some helpful code that will help you write and format a Signpost draft. If it's blank, you can fill out a template by copy-pasting this in and pressing 'publish changes': {{subst:Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Story-preload}}
| Images and Galleries |
|---|
To put an image in your article, use the following template (link):  {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Filler image-v2
|size = 300px
|fullwidth = no
|alt = TKTK
|caption =
|image =
}}
This will create the file on the right. Keep the 300px in most cases. If writing a 'full width' article, change
Placing {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Inline image
|size = 300px
|align = center
|alt = TKTK
|caption =
|image =
}}
(link) will instead create an inline image like below 
To create a gallery, use the following <gallery style="float:right;" mode=packed | heights=200px> |TKTK |TKTK </gallery> Each line inside the tags should be formatted like
If you want it centered, remove t |
.jpg)
| Quotes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
To insert a framed quote like the one on the right, use this template (link): {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Filler quote-v2
|1 =
|author =
|source =
|fullwidth =
}}
If writing a 'full width' article, change
To insert a pull quote like
use this template (link): {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Quote
|1 =
|source =
}}
To insert a long inline quote like
use this template (link): {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/block quote
| text =
| by =
| source =
| ts =
| oldid =
}}
| |||||||||
| Side frames | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. A captionSide frames help put content in sidebar vignettes. For instance, this one (link): {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Filler frame-v2
|1 = Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
|caption = A caption
|fullwidth = no
}}
gives the frame on the right. This is useful when you want to insert non-standard images, quotes, graphs, and the like.
For example, to insert the {{Graph:Chart}} generated by {{Graph:Chart
|width=250|height=100|type=line
|x=1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8|y=10,12,6,14,2,10,7,9
}}
in a frame, simple put the graph code in {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Filler frame-v2
|1=
{{Graph:Chart
|width=250|height=100|type=line
|x=1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8|y=10,12,6,14,2,10,7,9
}}
|caption=A caption
|fullwidth=no
}}
to get the framed Graph:Chart on the right. If writing a 'full width' article, change |
| Two-column vs full width styles |
|---|
|
If you keep the 'normal' preloaded draft and work from there, you will be using the two-column style. This is perfectly fine in most cases and you don't need to do anything. However, every time you have a However, you can also fine-tune which style is used at which point in an article. To switch from two-column → full width style midway in an article, insert {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost-block-end-v2}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost-block-start-v2|fullwidth=yes}}
where you want the switch to happen. To switch from full width → two-column style midway in an article, insert {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost-block-end-v2}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost-block-start-v2|fullwidth=no}}
where you want the switch to happen. |
| Article series |
|---|
|
To add a series of 'related articles' your article, use the following code  Five, ten, and fifteen years ago {{Signpost series
|type = sidebar-v2
|tag = VisualEditor
|seriestitle = Visual Editor
|fullwidth = no
}}
or {{Signpost series
|type = sidebar-v2
|tag = VisualEditor
|seriestitle = Visual Editor
|fullwidth = yes
}}
will create the sidebar on the right. If writing a 'full width' article, change Alternatively, you can use {{Signpost series
|type = inline
|tag = VisualEditor
|tag_name = visual editor
|tag_pretext = the
}}
at the end of an article to create
If you think a topic would make a good series, but you don't see a tag for it, or that all the articles in a series seem 'old', ask for help at the WT:NEWSROOM. Many more tags exist, but they haven't been documented yet. |
For more Signpost coverage on the visual editor see our | Links and such | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
By the way, the template that you're reading right now is {{Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Next issue}} (edit). A list of the preload templates for Signpost articles can be found here. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discuss this story
These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.I took a reasonably serious look at the Heritage Foundation's slide deck a few days ago. While what is shown is vague, the most plausible interpretations would involve illegal activity. I'd be interested to know if the deck is vague because the author didn't know what they were talking about, because that's how they write presentations or because they were being cautious what they committed to a written record (or indeed some other reason, or combination). The deck also omits any description of what "Misplaced Pages editors abusing their position" means. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 10:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC).
- I'm just speculating, but to me the slideshow read like they were in the early stage of the project. Its essentially a list of all the commonly known ways to identify pseudonymous users on the internet (or cliques of users. Some of the methods (but only some) would be more useful to identify which users are sockpuppets of each other or at least working closely together, but not their actual identity per se) excluding techniques that are excessively expensive/illegal like getting a 0-day on the black market. I think they were pitching what they could potentially do, but don't really have a plan yet, so that's why its all very vague. In essence I think they were writing a pitch for a project that hasn't started yet.
- My theory on this is as follows (I'm giving a lot of benefit of the doubt here, but at the same time I think its important to keep in mind that villains never think of themselves as evil; they always think of themselves as justified): Heritage foundation believes that Misplaced Pages is biased against it (True or not, American right wing has had this as a talking point for a while now, so I think they earnestly believe it). They believe their ideological enemies have infiltrated Misplaced Pages and the system is being gamed. Perhaps they saw the news about the "Off-wiki misconduct in Palestine–Israel topic area" and they felt that only further confirmed what they already suspected and that it is the tip of the iceberg (Given the timing of all this, I actually do think that whole drama might have been what gave heritage foundation the idea). Given they are a think tank who aims to shape the public narrative, this is a major problem for them. So they decide to do something about it. People have been assuming that their intent is to dox, harass and generally have a chilling effect on wikipedia editors who disagree with them in topic areas they care about, but I don't think that's quite it (Although perhaps that is a bonus to them). I think they earnestly believe (to be clear, I'm not saying this is true, just that the heritage foundation folks believe it) that their ideological opponents have infiltrated Misplaced Pages, and they want to set that "right". I think they wanted to achieve this by gathering evidence of people off-wiki collaborating/sock puppeting/etc (By essentially investigating everyone against them in certain topic areas until they find dirt). I think they wanted to sell this "investigation" as "investigative journalism". This would give it the legitimacy of journalism. Something coming out of a partisan think tank isn't going to change hearts and minds except for the people who already agree with them. However if they did uncover some large partisan sockpuppet ring or something, they probably believe having it be in a newspaper would put pressure on Misplaced Pages to change its system (or failing that delegitimize wikipedia as "neutral" which would probably also work for them) in a way that they never could do themselves. So in essence, what I think this presentation is, is a pitch deck to get some major news outlet on board to do the investigation with them and publish it under their banner. Which is why its essentially a laundry list of techniques that while grey-area probably are maybe not straight up illegal. I think this would explain why everything is so vague (Its just a pitch), and also why they were emailing their evil plans to journalists, bond-villian style. Bawolff (talk) 12:37, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Laws vary over time and from country to country. Techniques that are legal in some jurisdictions may not be legal under European Data Protection Law. So if they are planning to look for similar writing styles of pairs of editors who support each other and report possible sockpuppets to our Sock hunters, then that's fine. But the implied dodgier stuff? Friends, please review your passwords and change any old or weak ones. ϢereSpielChequers 12:58, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- IANAL, but presumably the laws that matter would be where the Heritage foundation is located, which i guess is Washington DC. The stuff they are proposing would be blatantly illegal under GDPR, and I think EU claims GDPR still applies even for groups outside the EU if they are handling data of an EU national, but as a practical matter, it seems hard to imagine that any laws other than US ones would apply, and US laws are pretty weak. While I agree that reviewing passwords is always good advice, I think its important to note that the presentation did not mention anything about attempting to login to targets accounts (Probably because such a thing would be blatantly illegal, even in the USA) Bawolff (talk) 13:09, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Laws vary over time and from country to country. Techniques that are legal in some jurisdictions may not be legal under European Data Protection Law. So if they are planning to look for similar writing styles of pairs of editors who support each other and report possible sockpuppets to our Sock hunters, then that's fine. But the implied dodgier stuff? Friends, please review your passwords and change any old or weak ones. ϢereSpielChequers 12:58, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- I smell a lawsuit if this happens and it would be big i would support it i bet others would too i know we just came off the last lawsuit but this one I’m confident wmf would succeed as its genuinely a federal crime, as some one who can’t even drive a car my self yet I believe its extra illegal I’m ready to go up in arms. •Cyberwolf•talk? 18:02, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Useful article about Israeli propaganda techniques:
If the Forward is right, we'll see a lot more of that sort of thing in the months to come ... --Andreas JN466 20:17, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Interlanguage link for Shomrim Center for Media and Democracy
@Jayen466: Would you consider substituting one of these for the Shomrim Center for Media and Democracy red link?
{{ill|Shomrim Center for Media and Democracy|he}}, which produces Shomrim Center for Media and Democracy{{ill|Shomrim Center for Media and Democracy|wd=Q111728626|short=yes}}, which produces Shomrim Center for Media and Democracy
Peaceray (talk) 21:04, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, links to the Hebrew article he:שומרים – המרכז לתקשורת ודמוקרטיה now. Andreas JN466 21:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)