Misplaced Pages

Talk:Canvas element: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:14, 19 April 2007 edit209.190.211.3 (talk) →Examples list - mostly spam?← Previous edit Revision as of 14:25, 11 May 2007 edit undo24.105.158.218 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
= Examples list - mostly spam? = = Examples list - mostly spam? =
Having a third of this article dedicated to examples is absurd. The list should be concise, to the point, non-spammy links to good examples of Canvas being implemented, not just a list of arcade games redone for the browser in Canvas. ] 16:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC) Having a third of this article dedicated to examples is absurd. The list should be concise, to the point, non-spammy links to good examples of Canvas being implemented, not just a list of arcade games redone for the browser in Canvas. ] 16:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

= Intellectual Property Issues =
This section talks about an email from March 07. In April, there was an email from mjs@apple.com to the w3c public-html list that said:

"If the group is agreeable to these proposals, Apple, Mozilla and
Opera will agree to arrange a non-exclusive copyright assignment to
the W3 Consortium for HTML5 specifications."

I don't know the details of this debate, but perhaps the section should be updated to reflect this?

Revision as of 14:25, 11 May 2007

broken link

in: Tucanos - The tucanos demo

Examples list - mostly spam?

Having a third of this article dedicated to examples is absurd. The list should be concise, to the point, non-spammy links to good examples of Canvas being implemented, not just a list of arcade games redone for the browser in Canvas. 209.190.211.3 16:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Intellectual Property Issues

This section talks about an email from March 07. In April, there was an email from mjs@apple.com to the w3c public-html list that said:

"If the group is agreeable to these proposals, Apple, Mozilla and Opera will agree to arrange a non-exclusive copyright assignment to the W3 Consortium for HTML5 specifications."

I don't know the details of this debate, but perhaps the section should be updated to reflect this?