| Revision as of 19:22, 1 June 2007 editReddi (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users58,350 edits k← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:28, 1 June 2007 edit undoStevewk (talk | contribs)988 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| I have never seen any article in wikipedia that has this done to it. Never. I do not think that it is unusual in writing in general, but every page I have seen in WP is ] formated. ] 19:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC) | I have never seen any article in wikipedia that has this done to it. Never. I do not think that it is unusual in writing in general, but every page I have seen in WP is ] formated. ] 19:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| yeah, i know. same here, but so what? Ever take a look at DNB or Oxford DNB. i dont particularly care that wiki doesnt recognize paragraph indentation. thats a failure on its part. ] 19:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:28, 1 June 2007
Archive : to 02 Nov 2006
Archive : to 16 Nov 2006
Archive : to 20 Nov 2006
Archive : to 08 Dec 2006
Archive : to 23 Feb 2007
Can you tell me why you are puting spaces in the decline and fall article? J. D. Redding 18:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
its encyclopedia style. except for the first paragraph in a new section, the rest are indented. why would you not indent or think that indenting was unusual? Stevewk 19:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
I have never seen any article in wikipedia that has this done to it. Never. I do not think that it is unusual in writing in general, but every page I have seen in WP is Justification (typesetting) formated. J. D. Redding 19:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
yeah, i know. same here, but so what? Ever take a look at DNB or Oxford DNB. i dont particularly care that wiki doesnt recognize paragraph indentation. thats a failure on its part. Stevewk 19:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)