Revision as of 17:45, 25 June 2007 editKelpin (talk | contribs)703 edits →Blocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:54, 25 June 2007 edit undoKelpin (talk | contribs)703 edits →BlockedNext edit → | ||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
==Blocked== | ==Blocked== | ||
This account has been indefinitely blocked for evading the block on ]. ] (]) 17:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC) | This account has been indefinitely blocked for evading the block on ]. ] (]) 17:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
:That is ridiculous. I am in no way related to the user MrClaxson! Please tell me what evidence you have. | :That is ridiculous. I am in no way related to the user MrClaxson! Please tell me what evidence you have? Just because I queried the block on MrClaxson does not mean I am MrClaxson. | ||
] 17:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC) | ] 17:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:54, 25 June 2007
|
xC | ☎ 14:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
MrClaxson related
Hi, MrClaxson (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) placed a comment about my general behaviour. It had absolutely no reference to the policy. I'd appreciate it if you didn't revert again; if you've got an issue with that then please leave a message on my talkpage.--Rambutan (talk) 17:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- See my reply here.--Rambutan (talk) 17:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- No. His edit did not reference the proposal, so it wasn't relevant. If you're really concerned, ask about it here: I'm 90% sure they'll say the same as I am. Sure, he's got a right to give his opinion, but he's got no right to give it in the wrong place. If he wants to complain about my actions, there are places where he can do that. A discussion page for a specific proposal is just that, and nothing else.--Rambutan (talk) 18:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- See my reply on the proposal page.--Rambutan (talk) 18:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- See reply.--Rambutan (talk) 18:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- See my reply on the proposal page.--Rambutan (talk) 18:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- No. His edit did not reference the proposal, so it wasn't relevant. If you're really concerned, ask about it here: I'm 90% sure they'll say the same as I am. Sure, he's got a right to give his opinion, but he's got no right to give it in the wrong place. If he wants to complain about my actions, there are places where he can do that. A discussion page for a specific proposal is just that, and nothing else.--Rambutan (talk) 18:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Evidence
Yours,--Rambutan (talk) 18:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh yes, your example revision. Well, that was because the caption was changed to ProfYana, with a full explanation, and the anon changed it back without one. That is unilateral editing without discussion, which is a bit iffy. Anyway, that's one reversion out of ~175 on the article. Are the others all awful, or were some of them worth doing?--Rambutan (talk) 18:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Re: Sound of Drums
Yeah, but he's more commonly known as just "Mr Saxon" or "Harry Saxon" - we don't use full, mostly unused names like "Anthony Blair" and "Thomas Cruise" where we can use "Tony Blair" and "Tom Cruise". Will 11:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- The BBC have used the name "Harry" in the press summaries, and McFly used it in the teaser (and likely will do so in the episode). Will 11:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and I do know he was referred to as Harold in "The Lazarus Experiment". :) Will 11:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, the BBC have the same amount of reliability as the episodes themselves. Will 11:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Can you source the Davros thing? As producers of the program, the BBC are reliable, and if it was a spoof, that doesn't impact their reliability. Will 11:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- I believe User:Kelpin is conflating the BBC website with a prank that was played by an IMDB contributor. Mark H Wilkinson 12:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Can you source the Davros thing? As producers of the program, the BBC are reliable, and if it was a spoof, that doesn't impact their reliability. Will 11:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, the BBC have the same amount of reliability as the episodes themselves. Will 11:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and I do know he was referred to as Harold in "The Lazarus Experiment". :) Will 11:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
This account has been indefinitely blocked for evading the block on User:MrClaxson. --Akhilleus (talk) 17:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- That is ridiculous. I am in no way related to the user MrClaxson! Please tell me what evidence you have? Just because I queried the block on MrClaxson does not mean I am MrClaxson.
Kelpin 17:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Category: