| Revision as of 15:29, 27 June 2007 editJpgordon (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,524 edits ←Created page with 'Clerks: do we generally allow non-evidence on the evidence page, or do we ask it be removed? There are a lot of statements here that are either interpretations of p...' | Revision as of 15:49, 27 June 2007 edit undoKirill Lokshin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users75,365 edits HehNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Clerks: do we generally allow non-evidence on the evidence page, or do we ask it be removed? There are a lot of statements here that are either interpretations of policy or conclusions of some sort or another. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 15:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | Clerks: do we generally allow non-evidence on the evidence page, or do we ask it be removed? There are a lot of statements here that are either interpretations of policy or conclusions of some sort or another. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 15:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Probably something of a lost cause at this point; and it's not like there's that much actual evidence in this case anyways. ;-) ] 15:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:49, 27 June 2007
Clerks: do we generally allow non-evidence on the evidence page, or do we ask it be removed? There are a lot of statements here that are either interpretations of policy or conclusions of some sort or another. --jpgordon 15:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Probably something of a lost cause at this point; and it's not like there's that much actual evidence in this case anyways. ;-) Kirill 15:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)