Revision as of 18:06, 26 June 2007 editVassyana (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,130 edits →Blocked: bear with me← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:25, 29 June 2007 edit undoKelpin (talk | contribs)703 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
I am contacting the blocking admin to sort this out. Please bear with me for a day or two. Cheers! ] 18:06, 26 June 2007 (UTC) | I am contacting the blocking admin to sort this out. Please bear with me for a day or two. Cheers! ] 18:06, 26 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
Further evidence that I am not MrClaxson. If you review all my edits on ip 83.105.96.154 (which I used before I had this account) you will see that I did not sign any of my comments until Rambutan told me how to here http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:83.105.96.154 . (I didn't sign them because I didn't know how to). If you look at the postings of MrClaxson and his alleged sock puppets you will find that most if not all are signed. | |||
Moreover Misplaced Pages guidance says you should assume Good Faith. Akhilleus has not done this. No one has complained that I am a sock puppet - Akhilleus has assumed bad faith on my part because I questioned his decision that MrClaxson was a sock puppet. Moreover Akhilleus has failed to respond to any of my emails to discuss this matter - even if he does not agree with me this would be the courteous thing to do, and what I was led to believe would happen from the guidance given to me at the time the block was placed. ] 08:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:25, 29 June 2007
|
xC | ☎ 14:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
MrClaxson related
Hi, MrClaxson (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) placed a comment about my general behaviour. It had absolutely no reference to the policy. I'd appreciate it if you didn't revert again; if you've got an issue with that then please leave a message on my talkpage.--Rambutan (talk) 17:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- See my reply here.--Rambutan (talk) 17:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- No. His edit did not reference the proposal, so it wasn't relevant. If you're really concerned, ask about it here: I'm 90% sure they'll say the same as I am. Sure, he's got a right to give his opinion, but he's got no right to give it in the wrong place. If he wants to complain about my actions, there are places where he can do that. A discussion page for a specific proposal is just that, and nothing else.--Rambutan (talk) 18:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- See my reply on the proposal page.--Rambutan (talk) 18:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- See reply.--Rambutan (talk) 18:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- See my reply on the proposal page.--Rambutan (talk) 18:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- No. His edit did not reference the proposal, so it wasn't relevant. If you're really concerned, ask about it here: I'm 90% sure they'll say the same as I am. Sure, he's got a right to give his opinion, but he's got no right to give it in the wrong place. If he wants to complain about my actions, there are places where he can do that. A discussion page for a specific proposal is just that, and nothing else.--Rambutan (talk) 18:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Evidence
Yours,--Rambutan (talk) 18:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh yes, your example revision. Well, that was because the caption was changed to ProfYana, with a full explanation, and the anon changed it back without one. That is unilateral editing without discussion, which is a bit iffy. Anyway, that's one reversion out of ~175 on the article. Are the others all awful, or were some of them worth doing?--Rambutan (talk) 18:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Re: Sound of Drums
Yeah, but he's more commonly known as just "Mr Saxon" or "Harry Saxon" - we don't use full, mostly unused names like "Anthony Blair" and "Thomas Cruise" where we can use "Tony Blair" and "Tom Cruise". Will 11:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- The BBC have used the name "Harry" in the press summaries, and McFly used it in the teaser (and likely will do so in the episode). Will 11:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and I do know he was referred to as Harold in "The Lazarus Experiment". :) Will 11:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, the BBC have the same amount of reliability as the episodes themselves. Will 11:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Can you source the Davros thing? As producers of the program, the BBC are reliable, and if it was a spoof, that doesn't impact their reliability. Will 11:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- I believe User:Kelpin is conflating the BBC website with a prank that was played by an IMDB contributor. Mark H Wilkinson 12:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Can you source the Davros thing? As producers of the program, the BBC are reliable, and if it was a spoof, that doesn't impact their reliability. Will 11:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, the BBC have the same amount of reliability as the episodes themselves. Will 11:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and I do know he was referred to as Harold in "The Lazarus Experiment". :) Will 11:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
This account has been indefinitely blocked for evading the block on User:MrClaxson. --Akhilleus (talk) 17:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC) {{
- I would also point out that whilst I haven't had this account for long I have previously made a number of postings under my ip address 83.105.96.154. If you check the history on these they go back quite some time http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?limit=50&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=83.105.96.154&namespace=. Surely you do not think I posted these just to give my Kelpin alias credibility?
- May I also suggest that you compare our ip addresses and email accounts. I am sure you will find they are different. Moreover if you do a Google search on my real name (you can obtain from my email address - my first name is 5 letter's long - if Admin cannot see my email address please post a message below and I will email you from Misplaced Pages so that you can) you will find a number of references to me on the internet which should prove conclusively that I am a real person (especially as my real life forename and surname are quite unusual. If I was going to create this account as a sock puppet do you really think I would use my real name?
- PS - sorry half of this appears I can't figure out what I've done wrong. If my appeal is successful perhaps someone could tell me?|I am in no way related to the user MrClaxson! This block has been placed here merely because I queried the block on MrClaxson this does not mean I am MrClaxson. In fact if I were a sock puppet of MrClaxson I would not argue with that decision I would just set up another account and move on, and would not want to draw attention to myself.
- I would also point out that whilst I haven't had this account for long I have previously made a number of postings under my ip address 83.105.96.154. If you check the history on these they go back quite some time http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?limit=50&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=83.105.96.154&namespace=. Surely you do not think I posted these just to give my Kelpin alias credibility?
- May I also suggest that you compare our ip addresses and email accounts. I am sure you will find they are different. Moreover if you do a Google search on my real name (you can obtain from my email address - my first name is 5 letter's long - if Admin cannot see my email address please post a message below and I will email you from Misplaced Pages so that you can) you will find a number of references to me on the internet which should prove conclusively that I am a real person (especially as my real life forename and surname are quite unusual. If I was going to create this account as a sock puppet do you really think I would use my real name?
- PS - sorry half of this appears I can't figure out what I've done wrong. If my appeal is successful perhaps someone could tell me?]]}}
I am contacting the blocking admin to sort this out. Please bear with me for a day or two. Cheers! Vassyana 18:06, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Further evidence that I am not MrClaxson. If you review all my edits on ip 83.105.96.154 (which I used before I had this account) you will see that I did not sign any of my comments until Rambutan told me how to here http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:83.105.96.154 . (I didn't sign them because I didn't know how to). If you look at the postings of MrClaxson and his alleged sock puppets you will find that most if not all are signed. Moreover Misplaced Pages guidance says you should assume Good Faith. Akhilleus has not done this. No one has complained that I am a sock puppet - Akhilleus has assumed bad faith on my part because I questioned his decision that MrClaxson was a sock puppet. Moreover Akhilleus has failed to respond to any of my emails to discuss this matter - even if he does not agree with me this would be the courteous thing to do, and what I was led to believe would happen from the guidance given to me at the time the block was placed. Kelpin 08:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Category: