Misplaced Pages

E (mathematical constant): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:03, 14 September 2003 editFonzy (talk | contribs)7,716 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 12:11, 14 September 2003 edit undo217.168.172.157 (talk) clarification concerning HermiteNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:
The ] ''e'' is relevant because one can show that the ] exp(''x'') can be written as <math>e^x</math>; the exponential function is important because it is, up to multiplication by a scalar, the unique function which is its own ] and is hence commonly used to model growth or decay processes. The ] ''e'' is relevant because one can show that the ] exp(''x'') can be written as <math>e^x</math>; the exponential function is important because it is, up to multiplication by a scalar, the unique function which is its own ] and is hence commonly used to model growth or decay processes.


The number ''e'' is known to be ] and even ]. It was the first number to be proved transcendental without having been specifically constructed by ] in ]. It is conjectured to be ]. It features (along with a few other fundamental constants) in ]: The number ''e'' is known to be ] and even ]. It was the first number to be proved transcendental without having been specifically constructed; the proof was given by ] in ]. It is conjectured to be ]. It features (along with a few other fundamental constants) in ]:


: <math>e^{i\pi}+1=0</math> : <math>e^{i\pi}+1=0</math>

Revision as of 12:11, 14 September 2003


The constant e {\displaystyle e} (occasionally called Napier's constant in honor of the Scottish mathematician John Napier who introduced logarithms) is the base of the natural logarithm. It is approximately equal to

e = 2.71828 18284 59045 23536 02874 ...

It is equal to exp(1) where exp is the exponential function and therefore it is the limit

e = lim n ( 1 + 1 n ) n {\displaystyle e=\lim _{n\to \infty }\left(1+{\frac {1}{n}}\right)^{n}}

and can also be written as the infinite series

e = n = 0 1 n ! = 1 0 ! + 1 1 ! + 1 2 ! + 1 3 ! + 1 4 ! + {\displaystyle e=\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{1 \over n!}={1 \over 0!}+{1 \over 1!}+{1 \over 2!}+{1 \over 3!}+{1 \over 4!}+\cdots }

Here n ! {\displaystyle n!} stands for the factorial of n {\displaystyle n} .

The number e is relevant because one can show that the exponential function exp(x) can be written as e x {\displaystyle e^{x}} ; the exponential function is important because it is, up to multiplication by a scalar, the unique function which is its own derivative and is hence commonly used to model growth or decay processes.

The number e is known to be irrational and even transcendental. It was the first number to be proved transcendental without having been specifically constructed; the proof was given by Charles Hermite in 1873. It is conjectured to be normal. It features (along with a few other fundamental constants) in Euler's identity:

e i π + 1 = 0 {\displaystyle e^{i\pi }+1=0}

which was described by Richard Feynman as "The most remarkable formula in mathematics"!

The infinite continued fraction expansion of e {\displaystyle e} contains an interesting pattern as follows:

e = [ 2 ; 1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 1 , 6 , 1 , 1 , 8 , 1 , 1 , 10 , ] {\displaystyle e=}

The apparent iregularity at the beginning disappears if one rewrites the fraction as:

e = [ 1 ; 0 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 1 , 6 , 1 , 1 , 8 , 1 , 1 , 10 , ] {\displaystyle e=}

Extenal link