| Revision as of 07:09, 12 July 2007 editOhanaUnited (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators32,813 edits speedy delete per CSD G8← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:22, 12 July 2007 edit undo74.61.41.118 (talk) ←Blanked the pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{db-talk}} | |||
| How do you quote something. | |||
| <i>"Encyclopedia Dramatica has a pagerank of about 10,000 by now on Alexa and is still growing in popularity. Is there a reason it isn't listed here? ] 05:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *Lack of ] on it. ] 05:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::] talks about the need for sources to support claims made in an article, especially claims which are surprising or significant. ] says that the subject of an article can be used as a source for the article itself as long as it satisfies a list of guidelines. What exactly is the contention here, that Encyclopedia Dramatica is not a wiki? That it is not notable? This talk page mentions how Alexa ranking is not always accurate, nor relevant; what about page views, then? Comparing to... oh @#$%... ED's links are blocked. See: <nowiki>http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Special:Statistics</nowiki> Encyclopedia Dramatica's, it seems likely that ED with over 5x the article views of Uncyclopedia, yet with only 20-30% of the number of articles, has a lot of actual users while Uncyclopedia is a highly edited wiki that no one actually reads."</i> | |||
| ...copied from ]. | |||
| Can anyone explain why ED does not have an article? ] 07:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC) | |||