Revision as of 18:39, 4 August 2007 editWalton One (talk | contribs)9,577 edits →Your comments at []: - clarifying← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:13, 4 August 2007 edit undoEyeSerene (talk | contribs)20,213 edits GA CategoriesNext edit → | ||
Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
::That's OK. I also apologise, for accusing you of having a bad attitude (I probably read too much into your post, and I appreciate you didn't mean to offend anyone). I'd explain further, but I have to log off now, and I'm on wikibreak from tomorrow until 14 August - I'll discuss this further at another time. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC) | ::That's OK. I also apologise, for accusing you of having a bad attitude (I probably read too much into your post, and I appreciate you didn't mean to offend anyone). I'd explain further, but I have to log off now, and I'm on wikibreak from tomorrow until 14 August - I'll discuss this further at another time. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
::I've replied in full at ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 18:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC) | ::I've replied in full at ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 18:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
== GA Categories == | |||
Hi Lara - quick question for you. Which cat do TV programmes (specifically game-shows) come under; Arts or Misc? Cheers! ]''<sup>]</sup>'' 22:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:13, 4 August 2007
User talk:Indubitably/talkheader
The Simpsons
I have resonded to your GA review of the article. -- Scorpion 13:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- The article is now an FAC, so if you would be interested in leaving some comments, or assisting in improving the article, it would be much appreciated. Thanks, Scorpion 00:03, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Slap on the wrist
Quiet you, I'll assume whatever I damn well please :P Like right now I'm assuming that your support was awesome! :D Giggy UP 23:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:TorrePoster.PNG
for the image TorrePoster.PNG, you said that no rationale was listed. it's explained in the copyright box. "to provide critical commentary on the film, event, etc. in question or of the poster itself, not solely for illustration" Mghabmw 00:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- That's not an adequate fair use rationale. See WP:FURG. Lara♥Love 04:50, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Wikidudemans RFA withdrawn
Hey, I've decided to regretfully withdrawal my RFA. Based on the numbers I don't believe it would have ever been successful. It seemed to have gotten off to a bad start and then went down hill from there. It's very unfortunate that it turned out the way it did however I do appreciate your participation. Thanks. Wikidudeman 00:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, man. Maybe next time! Lara♥Love 04:47, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Re: The Simpsons
I noticed you placed the GAReview tag on The Simpsons, and placed it on hold. It looks like you forgot to change that to the GAOnHold tag when you did so, so I changed it at WP:GAC.
Also, you might be interested that the article was just nominated for featured article status today, even before achieving GA status. Dr. Cash 02:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Whoops! Nevermind! I see you've added it to the WP:GA page. Though you did forget to remove it from the candidates' page. Dr. Cash 02:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks for that! I seriously have to stop overlooking steps. They say that once you do something 10 times it becomes habit. Not true. Lara♥Love 04:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | ||
I'm awarding you this Copyeditor's Barnstar for your great work on the Parapsychology article. Keep up the good work. Wikidudeman 04:13, 3 August 2007 (UTC) |
- Thank you!! :) Lara♥Love 04:15, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
I second that! You are wonderful, this is awesome! – Dreadstar † 06:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I was impressed by all involved. The first edit brought the issue to my attention, I made note of it, you fixed it, another inquired so as to address it. Good times. That's how Misplaced Pages should run. Lara♥Love 06:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Reply to your comment
Sorry if i appeared to Bite, i often find it hard not to, i dont do it intentionally, i allways assume good faith but i try to adhere to the rules a bit, I am not biting, just explaining and saying thank you, you have helped me lessen my 'bite' . Blacksmith2Editor Review 07:27, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for answering my question. I appreciate the help! Cheers, Neranei /C 17:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Lara♥Love 17:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for awarding me The Tireless Contributor Barnstar. Here's my opportunity to express my thanks for your leadership in Uncategorized Good articles task force.
The Good Article Medal of Merit | ||
This Good Article Medal of Merit was given to express my thanks for your efforts and leadership in Uncategorized Good articles task force. OhanaUnited 17:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC) |
- Thank you!! This award means more to me than all the rest. :) Lara♥Love 17:26, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Original Barnstar | ||
I Pedro give you, LaraLove this barnstar in recognition of your valued input at WT:RFA and your willingness to accept and discuss other editors comments and opinions. You are an exceptional Wikipedian! Pedro | Chat 20:30, 3 August 2007 (UTC) |
- Thank you! Lara♥Love 05:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 31 | 30 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Adminship
If you're serious about helping WP:COIN or WP:SSP, I'd be glad to coach you. Try e-mail? Durova 15:14, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm in admin coaching right now. The Transhumanist's Virtual Classroom. Lara♥Love 16:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Your comments at WT:RFA
I am highly offended at your insinuation that new users who seek adminship are immature and power-hungry. I applied in October 2006 when I was a fairly new user, because I had never seen the process before and had no idea what the standards were. My RfA failed, and quite rightly so - I had fewer than 500 edits and did not have enough experience to be a decent admin. But it still hurt. I don't believe I was being "immature and power-hungry", or anything of the sort. And the comment I don't really care how they feel, is, with all due respect, demonstrative of a very bad attitude. Even leaving aside simple human decency, would it be a good thing if lots of new users were driven away after a premature RfA? No. We always need to recruit new contributors, and being helpful and considerate to them is the only way to do that. If I had been driven away after my first RfA, I would not have stayed on Misplaced Pages, would not have made thousands of edits and created several new articles, and would not have passed my second RfA (in April this year). Lots of other admins have gone through the same process. Walton 17:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- I've responded with an apology on that page. Admittedly, I don't get it, but I did not mean to offend anyone and I do apologize to you for that. Lara♥Love 17:35, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- That's OK. I also apologise, for accusing you of having a bad attitude (I probably read too much into your post, and I appreciate you didn't mean to offend anyone). I'd explain further, but I have to log off now, and I'm on wikibreak from tomorrow until 14 August - I'll discuss this further at another time. Walton 17:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- I've replied in full at WT:RFA. Walton 18:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
GA Categories
Hi Lara - quick question for you. Which cat do TV programmes (specifically game-shows) come under; Arts or Misc? Cheers! EyeSerene 22:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)